Research Papers

On Risk-Based Design of Complex Engineering Systems: An Analytical Extreme Event Framework

[+] Author and Article Information
Hami Golbayani

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 e-mail: hami.golbayani@uconn.edu

Kazem Kazerounian

Professor Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 e-mail: kazem@engr.uconn.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 15, 2014; final manuscript received December 1, 2014; published online February 27, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Michael Beer.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 1(1), 011002 (Feb 27, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: RISK-14-1030; doi: 10.1115/1.4029142 History: Received July 15, 2014; Accepted December 09, 2014; Online February 27, 2015

In this work, a novel analytical framework is proposed for the risk-based design of complex engineering systems. The risk based-design process is the reverse process of risk propagation that entails the optimum allocation of the desired risk of failure of the system to all of its components. This paper studies the challenges in the design process of complex systems, the mathematical modeling of their topological architecture, and their unique behaviors. These characteristics make it impossible for the designer to use the common reliability and risk methodologies in the design process. The fundamental development of this work is an analytical upper bound for the distribution of risk of failure in the subsystem or element level. This upper bound satisfies the subadditivity condition of a coherent measure of risk. Additionally, its simplicity and low computational cost provide an appropriate framework as a fundamental building block for the risk-based design of complex systems. The proposed methodology is applied to three examples with insignificant desired probability of failure and its accuracy is compared with the Monte Carlo simulation, demonstrating its effectiveness and value.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Song, C., Havlin, S., and Makse, H. A., 2005, “Self-Similarity of Complex Networks,” Lett. Nat., 433(7024), pp. 392–395. [CrossRef]
Strogatz, D. J., 1998, “Collective Dynamics of Small World Networks,” Nature, 393(6684), pp. 440–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Havlin, R. C., 2010, Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness and Function, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L., 2000, “Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks,” Nature, 406(6794), pp. 378–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cohen, R., Havlin, S., Ben-Avraham, D., 2002, “Structural Properties of Scale Free Networks,” Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet, S. Bornholdt, and H. G. Schuster, eds., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Stanley, J. G., 2011, “Robustness of a Network of Networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 107(19), p. 195701. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
National Research Council, 2007, “New Directions for Understanding Systemic Risk: A Report on a Conference Cosponsered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the National Academy of Sciences.” The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C..
May, R. L., 2008, “Ecology for Bankers,” Nature, 451(7181), pp. 893–895. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheffer, M. B., 2009, “Early Warning Signals for Critical Transitions,” Nature, 461(7260), pp. 53–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Taleb, N., 2010, “The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable: On Robustness and Fragility.” 2nd ed., Random House and Penguin, New York.
Kurtoglu, T., and Tumer, I. Y., 2007, “FFIP: A Framework for Early Assessment of Functional Failures in Complex Systems,” ICED, Cite des Sciences et de L’industrie, Paris, France.
Dubourg, V., Deheeger, F., Sudret, B., 2011, “Metamodel-Based Importance Sampling for the Simulation of Rare Events,” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP11), M. Faber, J. Köhler, and K. Nishijima, eds., Zurich, Switzerland.
Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J. M., Heath D., 1997, “Thinking Coherently,” Risk, 10(11), pp. 68–71.
Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J. M., Heath D., 1999, “Coherent Measures of Risk,” Math. Finance, 9(3), pp. 203–228. [CrossRef]
Golbayani, H., Kazerounian, K., 2008, “Optimum Error Allocation in Kinematic Chains Using Geometric Programming,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technology Conference, 2B, pp. 1241–1248.
Kiureghian, A. D., 2004, “First- and Second-Order Reliability Methods,” Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, E. Nikolaidis, D. M. Ghiocel, and S. Singhal, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (Chap. 14).
Nikolaidis, E., Ghiocel, D. M., Singhal, S., 2004, Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Chan, K. Y., 2006, “Monotonicity and Active Set Strategies in Probabilistic Design Optimization,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 128(4), pp. 893–900. [CrossRef]
Modarres, M., 2006, Risk Analysis in Engineering: Techniques, Tools, Trends, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Agarwal, H. A., and Renaud, J., 2002, “Reliability Based Design Optimization for Multidisciplinary Systems Using Response Surfaces,” 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, p. 1755.
Rackwitz R., Fiessler, B., 1978, “Structural Reliability Under Combined Random Load Sequences,” Comput. Struct., 9(5), pp. 489–494. [CrossRef]
Rosenblatt, M., 1952, “Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation,” Ann. Math. Stat., 23(3), pp. 470–472. [CrossRef]
Brockwell, A. E., 2007, “Universal Residuals: A Multivariate Transformation,” Stat. Probab. Lett., 77(14), pp. 1473–1478. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Alkarni, S. H., Siddiqui, M. M., 2001, “An Upper Bound for the Distribution Function of a Positive Definite Quadrative Form,” J. Statist. Comput. Simul., 69(1), pp. 41–56. [CrossRef]
Mathai, A. M., Provost, S. B., 1992, Quadratic Forms in Random Variables, Theory and Applications, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
Okamoto, M., 1960, “An Inequality for the Weighted Sum of χ2 Variates,” Bull. Math. Statist., 9(2/3), pp. 69–70.
Ruben, H., 1962, “Probability Content of Regions Under Spherical Normal Distributions, IV: The Distribution of Homogeneous and Non-homogeneous Quadratic Functions of Normal Variables,” Ann. Math. Statist., 33(2), pp. 542–570. [CrossRef]
Hayden, A. F., and Twede, D. R., 2002, “Observations on the Relationship Between Eigenvalues, Instrument Noise and Detection Performance,” Proc. SPIE, 4816(Imaging Spectrometry VIII), pp. 355–362.
Braunstein, L. A., Wu, Z., Chen, Y., Buldyrev, S. V., Sreenivasan, S., Kalisky, T., Cohen, R., Lopez, E., Havlin, S., Stanley, H. E., 2007, “Optimal Path and Minimal Spanning Trees in Random Weighted Networks,” Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos, 17(7), pp. 2215–2255. [CrossRef]
Souma, W., Fujiwara, Y., and Aoyama, H., 2005, “Heterogeneous Economic Networks,” The Complex Networks of Economic Interactions: Essays in Agent-Based Economics and Econophysics, (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 567) A. Namatame et al., eds., Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 79–92.
Wilensky, U., 1999, NetLogo Itself, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Lima, M., 2011, Visual Complexity: Mapping Patterns of Information, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Engelbrecht, A., 2010, Fundamentals of Computational of Swarm Intelligence, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Luke, S., 2013, Essentials of Metaheuristics, 2nd ed., Lulu. http://cs.gmu.edu/∼sean/book/metaheuristics/.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A complex network (source: [1])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Failure of the limit state function at the design point and tail of the distributions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two-linkage planar manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simulated limit state function by using MCS and the proposed method (solid line) in Ex. 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

QQplot of limit state function in Ex. 1 versus standard normal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Three-linkage spatial manipulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Simulated limit state function, by using MCS and the proposed method (solid line) in Ex. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The complex network of Ex. 3 modeled in NetLogo [31,32]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The distribution of the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix in Ex. 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Simulated PDF of failure for the complex system in Ex. 3, MCS, and the proposed method (solid line)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In