0
Research Papers

Uncertainty Management in Remanufacturing Decisions: A Consideration of Uncertainties in Market Demand, Quantity, and Quality of Returns

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Raihanian Mashhadi

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260-1660

Behzad Esmaeilian

Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115

Sara Behdad

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department;Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14260-1660

Manuscript received September 28, 2014; final manuscript received February 3, 2015; published online April 20, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Athanasios Pantelous.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 1(2), 021007 (Apr 20, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: RISK-14-1063; doi: 10.1115/1.4029759 History: Received September 28, 2014; Accepted February 05, 2015; Online April 20, 2015

As market demand for remanufactured products increases and environmental legislation puts further enforcement on original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), remanufacturing is becoming an important business. However, profitability of salvaging operations is still a challenge in remanufacturing industry. Several factors influence the cost effectiveness of remanufacturing operations, including uncertainties in the quantity of return flows and market demand as well as variability in the quality of received items. The objective of this paper is to develop a stochastic optimization model based on chance-constrained programming to deal with these sources of uncertainties in take-back and inventory planning systems. The main purpose of the model is to determine the best upgrade level for a received product with certain quality level with the aim of maximizing profit. An example of personal computer is provided to show the application of the method.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Toffel, M. W., 2003, “The Growing Strategic Importance of End-of-Life Product Management,” Calif. Manage. Rev., 45(3), pp. 102–129. 10.2307/41166178
Linton, J., 1999, “Electronic Products at Their End-of-Life: Options and Obstacles,” J. Electron. Manuf., 9(29), pp. 29–40. 10.1142/S096031319900026X
Behdad, S., Kwak, M., Kim, H., and Thurston, D., 2010, “Simultaneous Selective Disassembly and End-of-Life Decision Making for Multiple Products That Share Disassembly Operations,” J. Mech. Des., 132(4), p. 041002. 10.1115/1.4001207
Williams, E., and Hatanaka, T., 2005, “Residential Computer Usage Patterns in Japan and Associated Life Cycle Energy Use,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 177–182.
Behdad, S., Williams, A. S., and Thurston, D., 2012, “End-of-Life Decision Making With Uncertain Product Return Quantity,” J. Mech. Des., 134(10), p. 100902. 10.1115/1.4007394
Wang, J., Zhao, J., and Wang, X., 2011, “Optimum Policy in Hybrid Manufacturing/Remanufacturing System,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 60(3), pp. 411–419.
Guide, V. D. R., Jr., 2000, “Production Planning and Control for Remanufacturing: Industry Practice and Research Needs,” J. Oper. Manag., 18(4), pp. 467–483. 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00034-6
Souza, G. C., and Ketzenberg, M. E., 2002, “Two-Stage Make-to-Order Remanufacturing With Service-Level Constraints,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 40(2), pp. 477–493. 10.1080/00207540110090920
Kim, K., Jeong, B., and Jeong, S. J., 2005, “Optimization Model for Remanufacturing System at Strategic and Operational Level,” ICCSA 2005, Vol. 3483, pp. 566–576.
Kim, K., Song, I., Kim, J., and Jeong, B., 2006, “Supply Planning Model for Remanufacturing System in Reverse Logistics Environment,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 51(2), pp. 279–287. 10.1016/j.cie.2006.02.008
Souza, G. C., Ketzenberg, M. E., and Guide, V. D. R., Jr, 2002, “Capacitated Remanufacturing With Service Level Constraints,” Prod. Oper. Manag., 11(2), pp. 231–248. 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00493.x
Marx-Gómez, J., Rautenstrauch, C., Nürnberger, A., and Kruse, R., 2002, “Neuro-Fuzzy Approach to Forecast Returns of Scrapped Products to Recycling and Remanufacturing,” Knowledge-Based Syst., 15(1–2), pp. 119–128. 10.1016/S0950-7051(01)00128-9
Inderfurth, K., De Kok, A. G., and Flapper, S. D. P., 2001, “Product Recovery in Stochastic Remanufacturing Systems With Multiple Reuse Options,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 133(1), pp. 130–152. 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00188-0
Inderfurth, K., 2005, “Impact of Uncertainties on Recovery Behavior in a Remanufacturing Environment: A Numerical Analysis,” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage., 35(5), pp. 318–336. 10.1108/09600030510607328
Li, C., Liu, F., Cao, H., and Wang, Q., 2009, “A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Based Model for Uncertain Production Planning of Re-Manufacturing System,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 47(13), pp. 3657–3668. 10.1080/00207540701837029
Amini, M. M., Retzlaff-Roberts, D., and Bienstock, C. C., 2005, “Designing a Reverse Logistics Operation for Short Cycle Time Repair Services,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 96(3), pp. 367–380. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.05.010
Pishvaee, M. S., Jolai, F., and Razmi, J., 2009, “A Stochastic Optimization Model for Integrated Forward/Reverse Logistics Network Design,” J. Manuf. Syst., 28(4), pp. 107–114. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2010.05.001
El-Sayed, M., Afia, N., and El-Kharbotly, A., 2010, “A Stochastic Model for Forward-Reverse Logistics Network Design Under Risk,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 58(3), pp. 423–431. 10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.040
Listes, O., and Dekker, R., 2005, “A Stochastic Approach to a Case Study for Product Recovery Network Design,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 160(1), pp. 268–287. 10.1016/j.ejor.2001.12.001
Pati, R. K., Vrat, P., and Kumar, P., 2008, “A Goal Programming Model for Paper Recycling System,” Omega-Int. J. Manag. Sci., 36(3), pp. 405–417. 10.1016/j.omega.2006.04.014
Tao, Z., Zhou, S. X., and Tang, C. S., 2012, “Managing a Remanufacturing System With Random Yield: Properties, Observations, and Heuristics,” Prod. Oper. Manag., 21(5), pp. 797–813. 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01313.x
Behret, H., and Korugan, A., 2009, “Performance Analysis of a Hybrid System Under Quality Impact of Returns,” Comput. Ind. Eng., 56(2), pp. 507–520. [CrossRef]
Mukhopadhyay, S. K., and Ma, H., 2009, “Joint Procurement and Production Decisions in Remanufacturing Under Quality and Demand Uncertainty,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 120(1), pp. 5–17. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.032
Denizel, M., Ferguson, M., and Souza, G. G. C., 2010, “Multiperiod Remanufacturing Planning with Uncertain Quality of Inputs,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., 57(3), pp. 394–404. 10.1109/TEM.2009.2024506
Vlachos, D., Georgiadis, P., and Iakovou, E., 2007, “A System Dynamics Model for Dynamic Capacity Planning of Remanufacturing in Closed-Loop Supply Chains,” Comput. Oper. Res., 34(2), pp. 367–394. 10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.005
Aras, N., Boyaci, T., and Verter, V., 2004, “The Effect of Categorizing Returned Products in Remanufacturing,” IIE Trans., 36(4), pp. 319–331. 10.1080/07408170490279561
Zikopoulos, C., and Tagaras, G., 2007, “Impact of Uncertainty in the Quality of Returns on the Profitability of a Single-Period Refurbishing Operation,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182(1), pp. 205–225. 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.025
Galbreth, M. R., and Blackburn, J. D., 2010, “Offshore Remanufacturing With Variable Used Product Condition,” Decis. Sci., 41(1), pp. 5–20. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00257.x
Kwak, M., and Kim, H., 2013, “Design for Life-Cycle Profit With Simultaneous Consideration of Initial Manufacturing and End-of-Life Remanufacturing,” Eng. Optim., 47(1), pp. 18–35. 10.1080/0305215X.2013.868450
Gonzalez-Torre, B., and Adenso-Diaz, B., 2003, “Optimizing Decision Making at the End of Life of a Product,” Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Vol. 5262, pp. 40–50.
Hedayati, M., and Subic, A., 2011, “A Framework for Extended End-of-Life Vehicle (ELV) Recovery Rate Based on a Sustainable Treatment Option,” Int. J. Sustain. Des., 1(4), pp. 381–401. 10.1504/IJSDES.2011.043292
Ng, Y. T., Lu, W. F., and Song, B., 2014, “Quantification of End-of-Life Product Condition to Support Product Recovery Decision,” Proceedings of the 21st CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, CIRP LCE 2014, Vol. 15, pp. 257–262.
Kwak, M., and Kim, H. M., 2011, “Assessing Product Family Design From an End-of-Life Perspective,” Eng. Optim., 43(3), pp. 233–255. 10.1080/0305215X.2010.482990
Kwak, M., and Kim, H., 2012, “Market Positioning of Remanufactured Products With Optimal Planning for Part Upgrades,” J. Mech. Des., 135(1), p. 011007. 10.1115/1.4023000
Behdad, S., and Thurston, D., 2011, “A Markov Chain Model to Maximize Revenue by Varying Refurbished Product Upgrade Levels,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE, Vol. 9, pp. 951–959.
Mitra, S., 2007, “Revenue Management for Remanufactured Products,” Omega, 35(5), pp. 553–562. 10.1016/j.omega.2005.10.003
Clottey, T., Benton, W. C., and Srivastava, R., 2012, “Forecasting Product Returns for Remanufacturing Operations,” Decis. Sci., 43(4), pp. 589–614. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00362.x
Shi, J., Zhang, G., and Sha, J., 2011, “Optimal Production Planning for a Multi-Product Closed Loop System With Uncertain Demand and Return,” Comput. Oper. Res., 38(3), pp. 641–650. 10.1016/j.cor.2010.08.008
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011, “Electronics Waste Management in the United States Through 2009,” [Online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/waste/conserve/materials/ecycling/docs/fullbaselinereport2011.pdf.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The upgrade planning process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Distribution of electronic products received for remanufacturing by PCRR in 2010; the majority of returns were personal computers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Upgrade strategy versus standard deviation of market demand for grade 2 products

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Profit versus standard deviation of market demand for grade 2 products

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Upgrade strategy versus standard deviation of incoming grade 2 products

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Profit versus standard deviation of incoming grade 2 products

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In