Review Article

An Overview of Uncertainty Concepts Related to Mechanical and Civil Engineering

[+] Author and Article Information
Ross B. Corotis

Professor Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering,
University of Colorado,
428 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309
e-mail: corotis@colorado.edu

Manuscript received September 26, 2014; final manuscript received February 3, 2015; published online October 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Alba Sofi.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 1(4), 040801 (Oct 02, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: RISK-14-1062; doi: 10.1115/1.4030461 History: Received September 26, 2014; Accepted April 27, 2015; Online October 02, 2015

Infrastructure decisions reflect multiple social, political, and economic aspects of society, leading to information/partial knowledge and uncertainty in many forms. Alternatives to classical probability theory may be better suited to situations involving partial information, especially when the sources and nature of the uncertainty are disparate. Methods under the umbrella of generalized information theory enhance the treatment of uncertainty by incorporating notions of belief, evidence, fuzziness, possibility, ignorance, interactivity, and linguistic information. This paper presents an overview of some of these theories and examines the use of alternate mathematical approaches in the treatment of uncertainty, with structural engineering examples.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Klir, G. J., 2006, Uncertainty and Information Foundations of Generalized Information Theory, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Vick, S. G., 2002, Degrees of Belief Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Press, Reston, VA.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H., 1988, Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York.
Klir, G. J., and Yuan, B., 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Shafer, G., 1976, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Zadeh, L. A., 1965, “Fuzzy Sets,” Inf. Control, 8(3), pp. 338–353. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Brown, C.B., and Yao, J. T. P., 1983, “Fuzzy Sets and Structural Engineering,” J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 109(5), pp. 1211–1225. [CrossRef]
Yao, J. T. P., and Furuta, H., 1986, “Probabilistic Treatment of Fuzzy Events in Civil Engineering,” Probab. Eng. Mech., 1(1), pp. 58–64. 10.1016/0266-8920(86)90010-X
Blockley, D., 1980, The Nature of Structural Design and Safety, John Wiley and Sons, Sussex, p. 365.
Blockley, D., Pilsworth, B., and Baldwin, J., 1983, “Measures of Uncertainty,” Civil Eng. Syst., 1(1), pp. 3–9. [CrossRef]
Ayyub, B., and Klir, G., 2006, Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Engineering and the Sciences, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, p. 400.
Klir, G. J., and Smith, R. M., 2001, “On Measuring Uncertainty and Uncertainty-Based Information: Recent Developments,” Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 32(1–4), pp. 5–33. [CrossRef]
Jordaan, I., 2005, Decisions Under Uncertainty: Probabilistic Analysis for Engineering Decisions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ang, A. H-S., and Tang, W. H., 2007, Probability Concepts in Engineering Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Cornell, C. A., 1968, “Engineering Seismic Risk Analysis,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 58(5), pp. 1583–1606.
Cornell, C. A., 1967, “Bounds on the Reliability of Structural Systems,” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 93(1), pp. 171–200.
Cornell, C. A., 1969, “A Probability-Based Structural Code,” ACI J., 66(1969), pp. 974–985.
Cornell, C. A., 1970, “A First-Order Reliability Theory for Structural Design,” Reliability and Codified Design (Structural Mechanics Study, Vol. 3), N. C. Lind, ed., Solid Mechanics Division, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Cornell, C. A., 1972, “Implementing Probability-Based Structural Codes,” Probabilistic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Vol. SP-31, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, pp. 111–146.
Ang, A. H-S., and Cornell, C. A., 1974, “Reliability of Structural Safety and Design,” J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 100(ST9), pp. 1755–1769.
Turkstra, C. J., 1972, “Theory of Structural Design Decisions,” Reliability and Codified Design (Structural Mechanics Study, Vol. 2), N. C. Lind, ed., Solid Mechanics Division, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Hasofer, A. M., and Lind, N. C., 1974, “Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format,” J. Eng. Mech. Div., ASCE, 100(1), pp. 111–121.
JCCS, 1976, First Order Reliability Concepts for Design Codes, Bulletin D’Information No 112, Joint Committee CEB/CECM/CIB/FIP/IABSE Structural Safety, Rűdiger Rackwitz, Coordinator.
Ellingwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A., 1980, Development of a Probability Based Load Criterion for American National Standard A58, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Whitman, R. V., 1973, “Damage Probability Matrices for Prototype Buildings,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering, Cambridge, MA, .
Whitman, R. V., Hong, S., and Reed, J. W., 1973, “Damage Statistics for High-Rise Buildings in the Vicinity of the San Fernando Earthquake,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil Engineering, Cambridge, MA, .
Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985, “Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California,” ATC, Redwood City, CA, .
National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), 1997, “Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, HAZUS Technical Manual,” FEMA, Washington, DC, .
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1989, Estimating Losses from Future Earthquakes: Panel Report and Technical Background,” Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, .
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000, “Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings,” Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
Cornell, A. C., and Krawinkler, H., 2000, “Progress and Challenges in Seismic Performance Assessment,” PEER Center News, 3(2), pp. 1–4.
Porter, K., 2003, “An Overview of PEER’s Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, July 6–9.
Bulleit, W. M., 2008, “Uncertainty in Structural Engineering,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., ASCE, 13(1), pp. 24–30. [CrossRef]
Melchers, R. E., 1999, Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, England.
Ayyub, B. M., 1998, Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis in Civil Engineering, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton.
de Neufville, R., 2004, “Uncertainty Management for Engineering Systems Planning and Design.” Engineering Systems Symposium, Mar. 29–31, O. Weck, D. Frey, D. Hastings, R. Larson, D. Simichi-Levi, K. Oye, A. Weigel, and R. Welsch, eds., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Applications, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
Bezdek, J. C., 1981, Pattern Recognition With Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Plenum Press, New York.
Bezdek, J. C., 1993, “Fuzzy Models—What Are They, and Why?,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 1(1), pp. 1–5. 10.1109/TFUZZ.1993.6027269
Wang, Z., and Klir, G. J., 2009, Generalized Measure Theory, (IFSR International Series on Systems Science and Engineering, Vol. 25), G. J. Klir, ed., Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York.
Muscolino, G., and Sofi, A., 2012, “Stochastic Analysis of Structures With Uncertain-but-Bounded Parameters via Improved Interval Analysis,” Probab. Eng. Mech., 28(1), pp. 152–163. [CrossRef]
Muscolino, G., and Sofi, A., 2013, “Bounds for the Stationary Stochastic Response of Truss Structures With Uncertain-but-Bounded Parameters,” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 37(1–2), pp. 163–181 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.06.016
Koyluoglu, H., and Elishakoff, E., 1998, “A Comparison of Stochastic and Interval Finite Elements Applied to Shear Frames With Uncertain Stiffness Properties,” Comput. Struct., 67(1–3), pp. 91–98. 10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00160-0
Elishakoff, I., 1999, Whys and Hows in Uncertainty Modelling, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria, p. 393.
Ferson, S., and Tucker, W.T., 2006, “Sensitivity Analysis Using Probability Bounding,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(10–11), pp. 1435–1442. 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.052
Hall, J. W., 2006, “Uncertainty-Based Sensitivity Indices for Imprecise Probability Distributions,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(10–11), pp. 1443–1451. 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.042
Beer, M., 2009, “Engineering Quantification of Inconsistent Information,” Reliab. Saf., 3(1–3), pp. 174–200. [CrossRef]
Moller, B., and Beer, M., 2004, Fuzzy Randomness: Uncertainty in Civil Engineering and Computational Mechanics, Springer, New York, NY, p. 325.
Zadeh, L. A., 1978, “Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1(1), pp. 3–28. 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5
Zadeh, L. A., 1986, “A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and Its Implication for the Rule of Combination,” The AI Mag., 7(2), pp. 85–90.
Shafer, G., 1987, “Belief Functions and Possibility Measures,” Analysis of Fuzzy Information, (Mathematics and Logic, Vol. 1), J. C. Bezdek, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Klir, G. J., and Folger, T. A., 1988, Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Dubois, D., 2006, “Possibility Theory and Statistical Reasoning,” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 5(1), pp. 47–69. [CrossRef]
Raufaste, E., Neves, R. S., and Marine, C., 2003, “Testing the Descriptive Validity of Possibility Theory,” Artif. Intell., 150(1–2), pp. 197–218. [CrossRef]
Dempster, A. P., 1967, “Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping,” Ann. Math. Stat., 38(2), pp. 325–359. [CrossRef]
Yager, R. R., and Liu, L., 2008, “Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions,” Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 219, J. Kacprzyk, ed., Springer, New York.
Dempster, A. P., and Shafer, G., 2008, Foreward: Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions, R. R. Yager, and L. Lieu, eds. (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 219), J. Kacprzyk, ed., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
Shafer, G., 2012, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, International DOI Foundation, Luxembourg, http://www.glennshafer.com/books/amte.html (accessed Nov. 7, 2012).
Smets, P., 1994, “What is Dempster-Shafer’s Model?,” Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 5–34.
Ayyub, B. M., 2011, Elicitation of Expert Opinion for Uncertainty and Risk, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Tesfamariam, S., and Wang, Y., 2012, “Risk-Based Seismic Retrofit Prioritization of Reinforced Concrete Civic Infrastructure: Case Study for State of Oregon Schools and Emergency Facilities,” Nat. Hazard. Rev., 13(3), 188–195. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000060
Cimellaro, G. P., and Arcidiacono, V., 2013, “Resilience-Based Design for Urban Cities,” Resilience and Urban Risk Management, D. Serre, B. Barroca, and R. Laganier, eds., Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp. 127–141.
Zadeh, L. A., 1988, Foreword—Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York.
Hacking, I., 1974, “Combined Evidence,” Logical Theory and Semantic Analysis, S. Stenlund, ed., D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 113–123.
Montgomery, D.C., and Runger, G. C., 2007, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Segui, W. T., 2003, LRFD Steel Design, Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA.
Maes, M. A., and Faber, M. H., 2004, “Issues in Utility Modeling And Rational Decision Making,” Proceedings of 11th IFIP WG 7.5 Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, M. Maes, and L. Huyse, eds., Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp. 95–104.
Torra, V., and Narukawa, Y., 2006, “The Interpretation of Fuzzy Integrals and Their Application to Fuzzy Systems,” Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 41(1), 43–58. 10.1016/j.ijar.2005.08.001


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Expansion of traditional probability theory along the two axes of language and measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Alpha-cuts illustrated for a fuzzy set A ˜

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Identified areas which may contain artifacts and region of favorable soil A (indicated by the dashed line)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In