0
Research Papers

Analysis of Stand-Up Forklift Operator Injuries in Off-the-Dock and Tip-Over Incidents With a Latched Door on the Operator Access Opening

[+] Author and Article Information
John F. Wiechel

S-E-A Limited;
The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH 43085
e-mail: wiechel.4@osu.edu

William R. “Mike” Scott

Biodynamic Research Corporation,
San Antonio, TX 78249
e-mail: mscott@brconline.com

Manuscript received February 18, 2015; final manuscript received August 7, 2015; published online January 4, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Chimba Mkandawire.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 2(2), 021005 (Jan 04, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: RISK-15-1021; doi: 10.1115/1.4031275 History: Received February 18, 2015; Accepted August 10, 2015

A series of tip-over and off-the-dock impact tests were performed with stand-up forklifts to investigate the potential for injury to the operator of a forklift in these types of accidents, when the forklift is equipped with an operator’s compartment door. One Crown Equipment Company 35RRTT Model and one 35RCTT Model stand-up forklifts were used in the impact tests. The only modification to the forklifts for the tests was the placement of a door on the entrance to the operator’s compartment. A Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was placed in the operator’s compartment as a human surrogate. During each test, head accelerations, chest accelerations, neck loads, and lumbar loads were measured on the ATD. The motion of the forklift and the ATD were filmed with real-time video and high-speed cameras. Results from the impact tests indicate that there is a high risk of head injury in a right-side tip-over accident and a high risk of head injury and neck injury in a left-side tip-over accident. There is a high risk of a head injury, neck injury, and thoracic injury in off-the-dock forks-trailing accidents. In an off-the-dock forks-leading accident, there is a high risk of arm/shoulder injury, head injury, and neck injury. In both tip-over and off-the-dock forks-trailing accidents, there is a high probability of an entrapment injury under the overhead guard on the forklift.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Zoghi-Moghadam, M., Watkins, C. B., Sadegh, A., and Dunlap, D., 2002, “Simluation of Stand-up Lift Truck Accidents to Evaluate Their Design and Operator Training Implications,” Proceedings of the 5th International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, November, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Zoghi-Moghadam, M., Sadegh, A., Watkins, C. B., and Dunlap, D., 2008, “Biodynamics Model for Operator Head Injury in Stand-up Lift Trucks,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 11(4), pp. 397–405. 10.1080/10255840701848806
Human Tolerance to Impact Condition as Related to Motor Vehicle Design, 2011, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrandale, PA, SAE J885.
Prasad, P., and Mertz, H. J. “The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 and the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrandale, PA, SAE Paper No. 851246.
Trosseille, X., Chamouard, F., and Terrière, C., 1988, “Reconsideration of the HIC, Taking Into Account the Skull Bone Condition Factor (SBCF)—Limit of Head Tolerance in Side Impacts,” Proceedings of the 32nd Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrandale, PA, SAE Paper No. 88710.
Mertz, H. J., and Irwin, A. L., 1994, “Brain Injury Risk Assessment of Frontal Crash Test Results,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrandale, PA, Paper No. 941056.
Vander Vorst, M., Stuhmiller, J., Ho, K., Yoganandan, N., and Pintar, F., 2003, “Statistically and Biomechanically based Criterion for Impact-Induced Skull Fracture,” 47th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Engineering, Chicago, IL.
Vander Vorst, M., Chan, P., Zhang, J., Yoganandan, N., and Pintar, F., 2004, “A New Biomechanically Based Criterion for Lateral Skull Fracture,” 48th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, Key Biscayne, FL, Association for the Advancement of Automotive Engineering, Chicago, IL.
Takhouts, E., and Eppinger, R., 2003, “On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model,” Stapp Car Crash J., 47, pp. 107–133. [PubMed]
Schmitt, K. U., Muser, M. H., and Neiderer, P., 2001, “A New Neck Injury Criterion Candidate for Rear-End Collisions Taking into Account Shear Forces and Bending Moments,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 4–7, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, DOT 809 220.
29CFR571.208, Standard 208, Occupant Crash Protection, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Kuppa, S., 2004, “Injury Criteria for Side Impact Dummies,” National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Forklift test situations: (a) right-side tip-over, (b) off-the-dock forks trailing, and (c) off-the-dock forks leading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Asymmetry of the 35RRTT Model during tip-over

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

35RRTT Model and ATD motion in forks-trailing off-the-dock test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

ATD head impact on the 35RCTT Model forks-leading off-the-dock test

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In