Research Papers

Plastic Collapse Behaviors of Tubulars with Recess Patterns—Application in Hollow Carrier Perforating Guns

[+] Author and Article Information
Haifeng Zhao

Rosharon, TX 77583
e-mail: hzhao13@slb.com

David Iblings, Aleksey Barykin

Rosharon, TX 77583

Mohamed Mehdi

Rosharon, TX 77583
e-mail: mmehdi@slb.com

1Corresponding authors.

Manuscript received January 28, 2016; final manuscript received September 6, 2016; published online November 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Ioannis Kougioumtzoglou.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 3(1), 011004 (Nov 21, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: RISK-16-1024; doi: 10.1115/1.4034660 History: Received January 28, 2016; Accepted September 06, 2016

The collapse strength of tubulars with recess patterns machined into their walls is an important topic for oil field downhole tools, especially in hollow carrier perforating gun systems. This paper presents a study of the plastic collapse behavior of thick-walled tubulars (those with an outside diameter to thickness ratio of approximately ten) having different patterns of circular recesses (blind holes partially machined into the tubing wall) that are subjected to external pressure. An empirical relationship between the reduction in collapse strength and the periodic distribution of recesses was constructed to account for the weakening effects of recess diameter, recess depth, axial spacing, angular phasing, etc. This strength reduction factor was introduced into the Tamano formula to predict collapse strength of recessed tubulars. Applicability of this empirical formula was validated with the aid of nonlinear, postbuckling finite element analyses (FEA). The strength reduction factor in combination with the Tamano formula provides a simple way of parametrically predicting the collapse strength of tubulars having circular recess patterns.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Holmquist, J. L., and Nadai, A., 1939, “A Theoretical and Experimental Approach to the Problem of Collapse of Deep-Well Casing,” Drilling and Production Practice, API, New York, pp. 392–420.
Palmer, A. C., and Martin, J. H., 1975, “Buckle Propagation in Submarine Pipelines,” Nature, 254, pp. 46–48. [CrossRef]
Tamano, T., Mimaki, T., Yanagimoto, S., 1983, “A New Empirical Formula for Collapse Resistance of Commercial Casing,” J. Energy Resour. Technol., pp. 489–495.
Issa, J. A., and Crawford, D. S., 1993, “An Improved Design Equation for Tubular Collapse,” Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX.
API, 2008, “Bulletin on Formulas and Calculations for Casing, Tubing, Drilling Pipe and Line Pipe Properties,” , American Petroleum Institute (API).
Adams, A. J., Moore, P. W., Payne, M. L., 2003, “On the Calibration of Design Collapse Strengths for Quenched and Tempered Pipe,” SPE Drill. Complet., 18(3), pp. 214–227. [CrossRef]
Abbassian, F., and Parfitt, S. H. L., 1998, “A Simple Model for Collapse and Post-Collapse Behavior of Tubulars with Application to Perforated and Slotted Liners,” SPE Drill. Complet., 13, pp. 190–196. [CrossRef]
Godfrey, W. K., and Methven, N. E., 1970, “Casing Damage Caused by Jet Perforating,” Proceedings of SPE AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX.
Smith, M. B., and Pattillo, P. D., 1983, “A Finite Element Analysis of Collapse of Perforated Casing,” Trans. ASME, 105, pp. 234–240. [CrossRef]
Gillespie, G., Hall, C. A., and Sladic, J. S., 2012, “Development of an Improved FLC Pill for Testing Wire Wrap Screens Collapse and Burst Resistance,” Proc., SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Galveston, TX.
Lake, L., 2007, Petroleum Engineering Handbook, SPE, Richardson, TX.
Mhaskar, N., Sloan, M., Myers, W., and Harvey, W., 2012, “Design and Qualification of an Ultra-high Pressure Perforating Systems,” Proc., SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conferences Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Galveston, TX.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) A full three-dimensional (3D) model of recessed tubular and (b) a cross-section view of 3D recessed tubular with dimensioning symbols

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A two-dimensional, unrolled schematic view of a representative periodic recess pattern; here S=4  in. and θ=60°

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress–strain curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

This case is a D=7  in., t=0.7  in. tubular with a recess pattern of d=1  in., h=0.4  in., θ=60°, S=4  in.: (a) cross section view of equivalent plastic strain contour at the onset level of collapse pressure. Gray indicates the equivalent plastic strain exceeds 5%; (b) contour plot of equivalent plastic strain of postcollapse pattern, where gray means that the equivalent plastic strain exceeds 20%.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

This case is a D=7  in., t=0.7  in. tubular with the recess pattern of d=1  in., h=0.4  in., θ=60°, S=4  in.: (a) pressure-deflection response at location A in Fig. 4, where U is the radial deflection of location A and (b) deformation configuration of the line at the outer diameter surface through location A along the longitudinal direction, and x is the longitudinal distance from location A

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of collapse strength reduction factors: (a) D/t ratio; (b) angular phasing of recess θ; (c) longitudinal spacing of recess S; (d) recess depth h; and (e) recess diameter d

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of analytical collapse pressure data with FEA results: (a) D/t ratio; (b) angular phasing of recess θ; (c) longitudinal spacing of recess S; (d) recess depth h; and (e) recess diameter d




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In