0
SPECIAL SECTION PAPERS

Fractional Derivatives in Interval Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Giulio Cottone

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile,
Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali,
Università degli Studi di Palermo,
Palermo 90128, Italy;
Engineering Risk Analysis Group,
Technische Universität München,
Munich 80333, Germany
e-mail: giulio.cottone@unipa.it

Roberta Santoro

Dipartimento di Ingegneria,
Università degli Studi di Messina,
Messina 98166, Italy
e-mail: roberta.santoro@unime.it

Manuscript received November 29, 2016; final manuscript received March 10, 2017; published online June 12, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Francesco Paolo Pinnola.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 3(3), 030907 (Jun 12, 2017) (6 pages) Paper No: RISK-16-1142; doi: 10.1115/1.4036705 History: Received November 29, 2016; Revised March 10, 2017

In this paper, interval fractional derivatives are presented. We consider uncertainty in both the order and the argument of the fractional operator. The approach proposed takes advantage of the property of Fourier and Laplace transforms with respect to the translation operator, in order to first define integral transform of interval functions. Subsequently, the main interval fractional integrals and derivatives, such as the Riemann–Liouville, Caputo, and Riesz, are defined based on their properties with respect to integral transforms. Moreover, uncertain-but-bounded linear fractional dynamical systems, relevant in modeling fractional viscoelasticity, excited by zero-mean stationary Gaussian forces are considered. Within the interval analysis framework, either exact or approximate bounds of the variance of the stationary response are proposed, in case of interval stiffness or interval fractional damping, respectively.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

SDOF with fractional damping under stochastic force and uncertain stiffness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison between the envelope of all the PSDs obtained by the vertex method, the lower (“x”) and upper (“o”) bound PDSs for β = 0.2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between the envelope of all the PSDs obtained by the vertex method, the lower (“x”) and upper (“o”) bound PDSs for β = 0.75

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variance of the displacement as a function of βI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

In gray, the envelope of all the PSD obtained by varying βI: in red line—the approximated lower bound PSD and in blue line—the approximated upper bound PSD. The continuous thick line is the PSD associated to the minimal variance.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In