0
Research Papers

An Approach to Uncertainty Identification in the Valuation of Transactive Energy Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Arun Veeramany

Mem. ASME
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
902 Battelle Boulevard,
Richland, WA 99354
e-mail: arun.veeramany@pnnl.gov

James T. Woodward

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
902 Battelle Boulevard,
Richland, WA 99354
e-mail: Jim.Woodward@pnnl.gov

Donald J. Hammerstrom

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
902 Battelle Boulevard,
Richland, WA 99354
e-mail: donald.hammerstrom@pnnl.gov

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received May 22, 2017; final manuscript received February 9, 2018; published online April 30, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Athanasios Pantelous.The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 4(4), 041005 (Apr 30, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: RISK-17-1064; doi: 10.1115/1.4039465 History: Received May 22, 2017; Revised February 09, 2018

Valuation of transactive energy (TE) systems should be supported by a structured and systematic approach to uncertainty identification, assessment, and treatment in the interest of risk-informed decision making. The proposed approach, a variation of fault tree analysis, is anticipated to support valuation analysts in analyzing conventional and transactive system scenarios. This approach allows for expanding the entire tree up to the level of minute details or collapsing them to a level sufficient enough to get an overview of the problem. Quantification scheme for the described approach lends itself for valuation. The method complements value exchange analysis, simulation, and field demonstration studies. The practicality of the proposed approach is demonstrated through uncertainty assessment of the smart grid interoperability panel peak heat day scenario.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hammerstrom, D. J. , Corbin, C. D. , Fernandez, N. , Homer, J. S. , Makhmalbaf, A. , Pratt, R. G. , Somani, A. , Gilbert, E. , Chandler, S. , and Shandross, R. , 2016, “Valuation of Transactive Systems,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, PNNL Technical Report No. PNNL-25323.
Hammerstrom, D. J. , Widergren, S. E. , and Irwin, C. , 2016, “Evaluating Transactive Systems: Historical and Current US DOE Research and Development Activities,” IEEE Electrification Mag., 4(4), pp. 30–36. [CrossRef]
Hammerstrom, D. J. , Makhmalbaf, A. , and Marinovici, M. C. , 2016, “Diagramming Transactive Building Business Cases: Using Principles of e3 Value to Document Valuation Studies,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, PNNL Technical Report No. PNNL-26127.
Morgan, M. G. , Henrion, M. , and Small, M. , 1992, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing With Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Raydugin, Y. , 2013, Project Risk Management: Essential Methods for Project Teams and Decision Makers, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Webley, P. , Riley, K. , Thompson, M. , Patra, A. , and Bursik, M. , 2016, Natural Hazard Uncertainty Assessment: Modeling and Decision Support, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [CrossRef]
Straub, D. , 2014, “Engineering Risk Assessment,” Risk-A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 333–362. [CrossRef]
Vesely, W. E. , Goldberg, F. F. , Roberts, N. H. , and Haasl, D. F. , 1981, Fault Tree Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Lutz, R. R. , and Shaw, H.-Y. , 1999, “Applying Adaptive Safety Analysis Techniques [For Embedded Software],” 10th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Boca Raton, FL, Nov. 1–4, pp. 42–49.
Modarres, M. , 1992, What Every Engineer Should Know About Reliability and Risk Analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Junjie, H. , Guangya, Y. , Koen, K. , Yusheng, X. , and Bindner, H. W. , 2016, “Transactive Control: A Framework for Operating Power Systems Characterized by High Penetration of Distributed Energy Resources,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 5(3), pp. 451–454.
Rao, K. D. , Kushwaha, H. , Verma, A. K. , and Srividya, A. , 2007, “Quantification of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties in Level-1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment Studies,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 92(7), pp. 947–956. [CrossRef]
Sengupta, R. N. , Gupta, A. , and Dutta, J. , 2016, Decision Sciences: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [CrossRef]
Eto, J. , Koomey, J. , Lehman, B. , Martin, N. , Mills, E. , Webber, C. , and Worrell, E. , 2001, “Scoping Study on Trends in the Economic Value of Electricity Reliability to the U.S. Economy,” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, Report No. LBNL-47911.
SGIP and TECG, 2016, “White Paper: Transactive Energy Application Landscape Scenarios,” Smart Grid Interoperability Panel (SGIP) and Transactive Energy Coordination Group (TECG), Washington, DC, Report.
Sijie, C. , and Chen-Ching, L. , 2017, “From Demand Response to Transactive Energy: State of the Art,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 5(1), pp. 10–19. [CrossRef]
Cox, W. , Cazalet, E. , Krstulovic, A. , Miller, W. , and Wijbrandi, W. , 2016, “Common Transactive Services,” Transactive Energy Systems (TES), Portland, OR, May 17–19.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Basic valuation process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Deductive reasoning supports uncertainty identification and impact measure evaluation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Top level impact measures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Difference between forecasted demand and actual demand that needs to be managed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Options to reduce demand during peak heat day

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Options to curtail demand during peak heat day

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Options to increase capacity during peak demand

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

An expanded view of the solutions tree for uncertainty identification

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In