Research Papers

Fuzzy Sensitivity Analysis in the Context of Dimensional Management

[+] Author and Article Information
Thomas Oberleiter

Applied Mechanics,
Erlangen 91058, Germany
e-mail: thomas.oberleiter@fau.de

Björn Heling

Engineering Design,
Erlangen 91058, Germany
e-mail: heling@mfk.fau.de

Benjamin Schleich

Engineering Design,
Erlangen 91058, Germany
e-mail: schleich@mfk.fau.de

Kai Willner

Applied Mechanics,
Erlangen 91058, Germany
e-mail: kai.willner@fau.de

Sandro Wartzack

Engineering Design,
Erlangen 91058, Germany
e-mail: wartzack@mfk.fau.de

Manuscript received March 29, 2018; final manuscript received July 11, 2018; published online August 14, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Siu-Kui Au.

ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B 5(1), 011008 (Aug 14, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: RISK-18-1017; doi: 10.1115/1.4040919 History: Received March 29, 2018; Revised July 11, 2018

Real components always deviate from their ideal dimensions. This makes every component, even a serial production, unique. Although they look the same, differences can always be observed due to different scattering factors and variations in the manufacturing process. All these factors inevitably lead to parts that deviate from their ideal shape and, therefore, have different properties than the ideal component. Changing properties can lead to major problems or even failure during operation. It is necessary to specify the permitted deviations to ensure that every single product nevertheless meets its technical requirements. Furthermore, it is necessary to estimate the consequences of the permitted deviations, which is done via tolerance analysis. During this process, components are assembled virtually and varied with the uncertainties specified by the tolerances. A variation simulation is one opportunity to calculate these effects for geometric deviations. Since tolerance analysis enables engineers to identify weak points in an early design stage, it is important to know the contribution that every single tolerance has on a certain quality-relevant characteristic, to restrict or increase the correct tolerances. In this paper, a fuzzy-based method to calculate the sensitivity is introduced and compared with the commonly used extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (EFAST) method. Special focus of this work is the differentiation of the sensitivity for the total system and the sensitivities for the subsystems defined by the α-cuts of the fuzzy numbers. It discusses the impact of the number of evaluations and nonlinearity on sensitivity for EFAST and the fuzzy-based method.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wärmefjord, K. , Lindkvist, L. , and Söderberg, R. , 2008, “ Tolerance Simulation of Compliant Sheet Metal Assemblies Using Automatic Node-Based Contact Detection,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2008-66344.
Lin, C.-Y. , Huang, W.-H. , Jeng, M.-C. , and Doong, J.-L. , 1997, “ Study of an Assembly Tolerance Allocation Model Based on Monte Carlo Simulation,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 70(1–3), pp. 9–16. [CrossRef]
Ziegler, P. , and Wartzack, S. , 2015, “ A Statistical Method to Identify Main Contributing Tolerances in Assemblability Studies Based on Convex Hull Techniques,” J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, 16(5), pp. 361–370. [CrossRef]
Heling, B. , Oberleiter, T. , Schleich, B. , Willner, K. , and Wartzack, S. , 2017, “ Comparison of Different Sensitivity Analysis Methods in the Context of Dimensional Management,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2017-70550.
Thornton, A. C. , 1999, “ A Mathematical Framework for the Key Characteristic Process,” Res. Eng. Des., 11(3), pp. 145–157. [CrossRef]
Davidson, J. K. , Mujezinović, A. , and Shah, J. J. , 2002, “ A New Mathematical Model for Geometric Tolerances as Applied to Round Faces,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 124(4), pp. 609–622. [CrossRef]
Teissandier, D. , and Delos, V. , 2011, “ Algorithm to Calculate the Minkowski Sums of 3-Polytopes Based on Normal Fans,” Comput. Aided Des., 43(12), pp. 1567–1576. [CrossRef]
Giordano, M. , Samper, S. , and Petit, J. P. , 2007, “ Tolerance Analysis and Synthesis by Means of Deviation Domains, Axi-Symmetric Cases,” Models for Computer Aided Tolerancing in Design and Manufacturing, Davidson J. K. , ed., Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 85–94.
Schleich, B. , Wartzack, S. , Anwer, N. , and Mathieu, L. , 2015, “ Skin Model Shapes: Offering New Potentials for Modelling Product Shape Variability,” ASME Paper No. DETC2015-46701.
Geis, A. , Husung, S. , Oberänder, A. , Weber, C. , and Adam, J. , 2015, “ Use of Vectorial Tolerances for Direct Representation and Analysis in CAD-Systems,” Procedia CIRP, 27, pp. 230–240. [CrossRef]
Heling, B. , Aschenbrenner, A. , Walter, M. , and Wartzack, S. , 2016, “ On Connected Tolerances in Statistical Tolerance-Cost-Optimization of Assemblies With Interrelated Dimension Chains,” Procedia CIRP, 43, pp. 262–267. [CrossRef]
Dantan, J.-Y. , and Qureshi, A.-J. , 2009, “ Worst-Case and Statistical Tolerance Analysis Based on Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems and Monte Carlo Simulation,” Comput. Aided Des., 41(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Giordano, M. , Mathieu, L. , and Villeneuve, F. , 2010, Product Lifecycle Management: Geometric Variations, ISTE/Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Khodaygan, S. , and Movahhedy, M. R. , 2015, “ A Comprehensive Fuzzy Feature-Based Method for Worst Case and Statistical Tolerance Analysis,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 5(4), pp. 1–22. [CrossRef]
Hanss, M. , 2010, Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Cavalini, A. A. , Dourado, A. G. S. , Lara-Molina, F. A. , and Steffen, V. , 2016, “ Uncertainty Analysis of a Tilting-Pad Journal Bearing Using Fuzzy Logic Techniques,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 138(6), p. 61016. [CrossRef]
Saltelli, A. , 2008, Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Cukier, R. I. , Fortuin, C. M. , Shuler, K. E. , Petschek, A. G. , and Schaibly, J. H. , 1973, “ Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients—Part I: Theory,” J. Chem. Phys., 59(8), pp. 3873–3878. [CrossRef]
Zadeh, L. A. , 1965, “ Fuzzy Sets,” Inf. Control, 8(3), pp. 338–353. [CrossRef]
Glancy, C. G. , 1994, “ A Second-Order Method for Assembly Tolerance Analysis,” MS thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
Boas, M. L. , 2011, Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 3rd ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
ISO, 2010, “ Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)—ISO Code System for Tolerances on Linear Sizes—Part 1: Basis of Tolerances, Deviations and Fits,” International Organization for Standardization, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Germany, Standard No. ISO 286-1:2010. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:286:-1:ed-2:v1:en
Schleich, B. W. S. , 2015, “ A Generic Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Geometric Variations Management,” 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Milan, Italy, June 27–30, pp. 343–352.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Methodology of tolerance management

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Fuzzy number and its α-cut

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fuzzy number with additional points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vector loops of one way clutch

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Probability distribution of the pressure angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Change of sensitivity (EFAST-method)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Change of sensitivity (fuzzy-method)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Absolut deviation of fuzzy based method from EFAST method for two different tolerances



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In