In late summer 2005, the U.S. pressurized water reactor (PWR) fleet imposed mandatory inspection requirements upon itself to address the challenge posed by primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) in PWR reactor coolant system (RCS) dissimilar metal (DM) piping butt welds. Under this program, the highest temperature, and thus most susceptible, locations have been addressed first. The set of highest temperature locations comprises the DM piping butt welds on the pressurizer. Within three years of promulgating the requirements, all pressurizer locations will have been inspected and nearly 90% of these locations will have been mitigated. In October 2006, several indications of circumferential flaws were reported in the pressurizer nozzles at Wolf Creek. These indications raised questions about the need to accelerate refueling outages or take mid-cycle outages at other plants. In order to address these concerns, an industry effort was undertaken to evaluate the viability of detection of leakage from a through-wall flaw in an operating plant to preclude the potential for rupture of pressurizer nozzle DM welds given the potential concern about growing circumferential stress corrosion cracks. Previous calculations of growth of PWSCC in Alloy 600 wrought materials and Alloy 82/182 weld metal materials have assumed an idealized crack shape, typically a semi-ellipse characterized by a length-to-depth aspect ratio. A key aspect of the industry effort involved developing an advanced finite-element analysis (FEA) methodology for predicting crack growth when loading conditions do not lead to a semi-elliptical flaw shape. The work also investigated an extensive crack growth sensitivity matrix to cover geometry, load, and fabrication factors, as well as the uncertainty in key modeling parameters including the effect of multiple flaw initiation sites in a single weld. Other key activities included detailed welding residual stress simulations covering the subject welds, development of a conservative crack stability calculation methodology, development of a leak rate calculation procedure using existing software tools (EPRI PICEP and NRC SQUIRT), and verification and validation studies. This paper will describe the study undertaken to model growth of circumferential weld cracks and its application to a group of nine PWRs with regard to implementation of the industry inspection and mitigation program [1]. The paper will also explore implementation progress of the industry program as the three-year mark approaches, as well as industry actions to support completion of baseline DM weld examinations.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
July 27–31, 2008
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Pressure Vessels and Piping
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4829-6
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
Advanced FEA Modeling of PWSCC Crack Growth in PWR Dissimilar Metal Piping Butt Welds and Application to the Industry Inspection and Mitigation Program
J. Broussard,
J. Broussard
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Collin,
J. Collin
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Harrington,
C. Harrington
Electric Power Research Institute, Dallas, TX
Search for other works by this author on:
G. DeBoo
G. DeBoo
Exelon Corporation, Warrenville, IL
Search for other works by this author on:
G. White
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
J. Broussard
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
J. Collin
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
M. Klug
Dominion Engineering, Inc., Reston, VA
C. Harrington
Electric Power Research Institute, Dallas, TX
G. DeBoo
Exelon Corporation, Warrenville, IL
Paper No:
PVP2008-61616, pp. 1157-1167; 11 pages
Published Online:
July 24, 2009
Citation
White, G, Broussard, J, Collin, J, Klug, M, Harrington, C, & DeBoo, G. "Advanced FEA Modeling of PWSCC Crack Growth in PWR Dissimilar Metal Piping Butt Welds and Application to the Industry Inspection and Mitigation Program." Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Volume 6: Materials and Fabrication, Parts A and B. Chicago, Illinois, USA. July 27–31, 2008. pp. 1157-1167. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2008-61616
Download citation file:
17
Views
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Welding Residual Stress Solutions for Dissimilar Metal Surge Line Nozzle Welds
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (April,2010)
Evaluation of the Integrity of PWR Bimetallic Welds
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2000)
Pump and Valve Fastener Serviceability in PWR Nuclear Facilities
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,1996)
Related Chapters
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 3, Third Edition
Iwe and Iwl
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition
PSA Level 2 — NPP Ringhals 2 (PSAM-0156)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)