We present an optimal control methodology, which we refer to as concentration-of-measure optimal control (COMOC), that seeks to minimize a concentration-of-measure upper bound on the probability of failure of a system. The systems under consideration are characterized by a single performance measure that depends on random inputs through a known response function. For these systems, concentration-of-measure upper bound on the probability of failure of a system can be formulated in terms of the mean performance measure and a system diameter that measures the uncertainty in the operation of the system. COMOC then seeks to determine the optimal controls that maximize the confidence in the safe operation of the system, defined as the ratio of the design margin, which is measured by the difference between the mean performance and the design threshold, to the system uncertainty, which is measured by the system diameter. This strategy has been assessed in the case of a robot-arm maneuver for which the performance measure of interest is assumed to be the placement accuracy of the arm tip. The ability of COMOC to significantly increase the design confidence in that particular example of application is demonstrated.

1.
Ledoux
,
M.
, 2001,
The Concentration of Measure Phenomenon
,
American Mathematical Society
,
Providence, RI
.
2.
Boucheron
,
S.
,
Bousquet
,
O.
, and
Lugosi
,
G.
, 2004, “
Concentration inequalities
,”
Advanced Lectures in Machine Learning
,
O.
Bousquet
,
U. V.
Luxburg
, and
G.
Rätsch
, eds.,
Springer
,
New York
, pp.
208
240
.
3.
Lucas
,
L.
,
Owhadi
,
H.
, and
Ortiz
,
M.
, 2008, “
Rigorous Verification, Validation, Uncertainty Quantification and Certification Through Concentration-of-Measure Inequalities
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
197
, pp.
4591
4609
.
4.
Leyendecker
,
S.
,
Ober-Blöbaum
,
S.
,
Marsden
,
J.
, and
Ortiz
,
M.
, 2007, “
Discrete Mechanics and Optimal Control for Constrained Multibody Dynamics
,”
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, Las Vegas, NV, Sept. 4–7.
5.
Leyendecker
,
S.
,
Ober-Blöbaum
,
S.
,
Marsden
,
J.
, and
Ortiz
,
M.
, 2009, “
Discrete Mechanics and Optimal Control for Constrained Systems (DMOCC)
,”
Opt. Control Appl. Methods
0143-2087, in press.
6.
Lawrence
,
C.
, 2004, “
An Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations Version 1.2
,” University of California at Berkeley, available online at http://math.berkely.edu/~evans/SDEcourse.pdfhttp://math.berkely.edu/~evans/SDEcourse.pdf
7.
McDiarmid
,
C.
, 1989, “
On the Method of Bounded Differences
,”
Surveys in Combinatorics (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series)
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, England
, Vol.
141
, pp.
148
188
.
8.
Hoeffding
,
W.
, 1963, “
Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
,”
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
0162-1459,
58
, pp.
13
30
.
9.
Ober-Blöbaum
,
S.
,
Junge
,
O.
, and
Marsden
,
J.
, “
Discrete Mechanics and Optimal Control: An Analysis
,”
ESAIM: Control Optimisation and Calculus of Variations
1292-8119, in press.
10.
Leyendecker
,
S.
,
Marsden
,
J.
, and
Ortiz
,
M.
, 2008, “
Variational Integrators for Constrained Dynamical Systems
,”
Z. Angew. Math. Mech.
0044-2267,
88
(
9
), pp.
677
708
.
11.
Marsden
,
J.
, and
West
,
M.
, 2001, “
Discrete Mechanics and Variational Integrators
,”
Acta Numerica
0962-4929,
10
, pp.
357
514
.
12.
Hairer
,
E.
,
Wanner
,
G.
, and
Lubich
,
C.
, 2004,
Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations
,
Springer
,
New York
.
13.
Krysl
,
P.
, 2005, “
Direct Time Integration of Rigid Body Motion With Discrete-Impulse Midpoint Approximation: Explicit Newmark Algorithms
,”
Commun. Numer. Methods Eng.
1069-8299,
22
(
5
), pp.
441
451
.
14.
Bou-Rabee
,
N.
, and
Marsden
,
J.
, 2009, “
Hamilton-Pontryagin Integrators on Lie Groups: Introduction and Structure-Preserving Properties
,”
Found Comput. Math.
1615-3375,
9
(
2
), pp.
197
219
.
15.
Antmann
,
S.
, 1995,
Nonlinear Problems in Elasticity
,
Springer
,
New York
.
16.
Reich
,
S.
, 1996, “
Symplectic Integrators for Systems of Rigid Bodies
,”
Fields Inst. Commun.
1069-5265,
10
, pp.
181
191
.
17.
Betsch
,
P.
,
Menzel
,
A.
, and
Stein
,
E.
, 1998, “
On the Parametrization of Finite Rotations in Computational Mechanics: A Classification of Concepts With Application to Smooth Shells
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
155
, pp.
273
305
.
18.
Bauchau
,
O.
, and
Trainelli
,
L.
, 2003, “
The Vectorial Parameterization of Rotation
,”
Nonlinear Dyn.
0924-090X,
32
(
1
), pp.
71
92
.
19.
Betsch
,
P.
, and
Leyendecker
,
S.
, 2006, “
The Discrete Null Space Method for the Energy Consistent Integration of Constrained Mechanical Systems. Part II: Multibody Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
67
(
4
), pp.
499
552
.
20.
Leyendecker
,
S.
,
Betsch
,
P.
, and
Steinmann
,
P.
, 2008, “
The Discrete Null Space Method for the Energy Consistent Integration of Constrained Mechanical Systems. Part III: Flexible Multibody Dynamics
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
1384-5640,
19
, pp.
45
72
.
21.
Marsden
,
J.
, and
Ratiu
,
T.
, 1994,
Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry. A Basic Exposition of Classical Mechanical Systems, Texts in Applied Mathematics
,
Springer
,
New York
, Vol.
17
.
22.
Bullo
,
F.
, and
Lewis
,
A.
, 2004,
Geometric Control of Mechanical Systems
,
Springer
,
New York
.
23.
Kirkpatrick
,
S.
,
Gelatt
,
C.
, Jr.
, and
Vecchi
,
M.
, 1983, “
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
,”
Science
0036-8075,
220
(
4598
), pp.
671
680
.
You do not currently have access to this content.