This paper presents the integrated structure/control design of high speed single link robots based on time-optimal control and finite element analysis. First, the solutions of a time optimal control problem are analyzed with respect to the arm link inertia and its structural flexibility. A new technique is developed to further reduce the optimal traveling time by redesigning the arm structure through the trade-off analysis between the arm inertia and its natural frequency. In the latter half of the paper, the design criterion is extended to multiple indices by considering residual vibrations, load bearing capacity and other design constraints. For suppressing residual vibrations, a simple feedback control is designed and its dynamic performance with respect to pole-zero locations is improved along with other criteria through mechanical structure modification. The finite element method is used as a modeling tool and the shape of the arm geometry is modified as design parameters. An arm is designed which performs much better as compared to the design which is done without considering the interactions between physical structure and control. The newly designed arm is tested by constructing an experimental setup. The results show significantly improved performance.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Design, Robots, Time optimal control, Inertia (Mechanics), Vibration, Feedback, Finite element analysis, Finite element methods, Geometry, Load bearing capacity, Mechanical structures, Modeling, Poles (Building), Shapes, Tradeoffs, Travel time (Traffic engineering)
1.
Karidis, J. P., McVicker, G., Pawletko, L. P., Zai, L. C., Goldowsky, M., Brown, R. E., and Comulada, R. R., “The Hummingbird Micropositioner Providing Three-Axis Motion at 50 G’s with low Reactions,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, May 1992, pp. 685–698.
2.
Personal communication with Noriyuki Fujiwara, MIT Center for Information Driven Mechanical Systems.
3.
Kahn, M. E., and Roth, B., “The Near-Minimum-Time Control Of Open-Loop Articulated Kinematic Chains,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, September 1971, pp. 164–172.
4.
Bobrow, T. E., Dubowsky, S., and Gibson, J. S., “On the Optimal Control of Robotic Manipulators with Actuator Constraints,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Francisco, June 1983, pp. 782–789.
5.
Shiller
Z.
, and
Dubowsky
S.
, “
Time Optimal Path Planning for Robotic Manipulators in the Presence of Obstacles, with Actuator, Gripper and Payload Constraints
,”
International Journal of Robotics Research
, Vol.
8
, No.
6
, Dec.
1989
, pp.
3
–
18
.
6.
Shin
K. G.
, and
Mckay
N. D.
, “
Minimum-Time Control of Robotic Manipulators with Geometric Constraints
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
AC-30
, June
1985
, pp.
531
–
541
.
7.
Shiller, Z., and Sundar, S., “Design of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Mechanisms for Optimal Dynamic Performance” Presented at the Design Technical Conference, Chicago, IL, September, 1990.
8.
Sundar
S.
, and
Shiller
Z.
, “
Constrained Optimization of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Mechanisms for Near-Time-Optimal Motions
,”
Mechanical Design and Synthesis
, ASME
1992
, DE-Vol.
46
, pp.
571
–
577
.
9.
Siciliano
B.
, and
Book
W. J.
, “
A Singular Perturbation Approach to Control of Lightweight Flexible Manipulators
,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research
, Vol.
7
, No.
4
,
1988
, pp.
79
–
90
.
10.
Cannon, Jr., R. H., and Schmitz, E., “Initial Experiments on the End-Point Control of a Flexible One-Link Robot,” International Journal of Robotics Research, 3(3), pp. 62–75.
11.
Park, J. H., and Asada, H., “Design and Control of Minimum Phase Flexible Arms with Torque Transmission Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 1991 American Control Conference, pp. 1885–1890.
12.
Spector
V. A.
, and
Flashner
H.
, “
Modeling and Design Implications of Non-Collocated Control in Flexible Systems
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
112
, pp.
186
–
193
.
13.
Khot, N. S., Venkayya, V. B., and Eastep, F. E., “Optimal Structural Modifications to Enhance the Active Vibration Control of Flexible Structures,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 24, No. 8, 1986.
14.
Miller, D. F., and Shim, J., “Gradient-Based Combined Structural and Control Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1987.
15.
Hale, A. L., Lisowski, R. J., and Dahl, W. E., “Optimal Simultaneous Structural and Control Design of Maneuvering Flexible Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1985.
16.
Bodden, D. S., and Junkins, J. L., “Eigenvalue Optimization Algorithms for Structure/Controller Design Iterations,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1985.
17.
Singh, G., Kadamba, P. T., and McClamroch, N. H., “Planar Time-Optimal Rest to Rest, Slewing Maneuvers of Flexible Spacecraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1987.
18.
Pao, L. Y., and Franklin, G. F., “Time-Optimal Control of Flexible Structures,” 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2580–2581. Honolulu, Hawaii, 1990.
19.
Rai, S., and Asada, H., “Computer-Aided Structure Modification of Electromechanical Systems Using Singular Value Decomposition,” Advances in Design Automation, 1992, Vol. 1, DE-Vol. 44–1 (accepted for publication in the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design).
20.
Park, J. H., and Asada, H., “Design and Control of Minimum Phase Flexible Arms with Torque Transmission Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1790–1795.
21.
MATLAB, The Mathworks Inc., 21 Eliot Street, South Natick, MA 01760.
22.
ADINA, Software for Finite Element Analysis, 71 Elton Avenue, Watertown, MA 02172 USA.
23.
Gilbert
M. G.
, and
Schmidt
D. K.
, “
Integrated Structure/Control Law Design by Multilevel Optimization
,”
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
, Vol.
14
, No.
5
, Sept-Oct
1991
, pp.
1001
–
1007
.
24.
Suzuki
S.
, and
Matsuda
S.
, “
Structure/Control Design Synthesis of Active Suppression System by Goal Programming
,”
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
, Vol.
14
, No.
6
, Nov-Dec
1991
, pp.
1260
–
1266
.
25.
Skelton
R. E.
,
Hanks
B. R.
, and
Smith
M.
, “
Structure Redesign for Improved Dynamic Response
,”
Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics
, Vol.
15
, No.
5
, Sept-Oct
1992
, pp.
1272
–
1278
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.