In this paper the robustness properties of explicit force control with respect to contact stiffness are investigated, considering different control laws applied to an industrial robot affected by joint compliance. A theoretical analysis, performed on the well-known linear fourth-order model of a single joint robot interacting with the environment, shows that, differently from the case of P or PD control, integral control ensures increasing stability with increasing contact stiffness. This result is believed new. In particular, it is shown that through the adoption of an integral control law, force control is actually feasible even in the case of an infinitely stiff environment, which is a quite common situation in real industrial applications (metal working, deburring, etc.). It is also shown that the adoption of a feedback on motor velocity can greatly widen the range of the stabilizing integral gains as well as the achievable bandwidth. Experimental results, obtained with the industrial robot SMART 3S, are provided in order to substantiate the theoretical analysis.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Force control, Stability, Robots, Stiffness, Theoretical analysis, Deburring, Engines, Feedback, Metalworking, Motors, Robustness
1.
An, C. H., and Hollerbach, J., 1987, “Dynamic Stability Issues in Force Control of Manipulators,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, Apr., pp. 890–896.
2.
Chiaverini
S.
,
Siciliano
B.
, and
Villani
L.
,
1994
, “
Force/Position Regulation of Compliant Robot Manipulators
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Controls
, Vol.
39
, No.
3
, pp.
647
–
652
.
3.
De Schutter, J., and Qian, H. P., 1992a, “The Role of Damping and Low Pass Filtering in the Stability of Discrete Time Implemented Robot Force Control,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, May, pp. 1368–1373.
4.
De Schutter, J., and Qian, H. P., 1992b, “Introducing Active Linear and Nonlinear Damping to Enable Stable High Gain Force Control in Case of Stiff Contact,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, May, pp. 1374–1379.
5.
Eppinger, S. D., and Seering, W. P., 1986, “On Dynamic Models of Robot Force Control,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 29–34.
6.
Eppinger, S. D., and Seering, W. P., 1987, “Understanding Bandwidth Limitations in Robot Force Control,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, April, pp. 904–909.
7.
Ferretti
G.
,
Maffezzoni
C.
,
Magnani
G.
, and
Rocco
P.
,
1993
, “
Decoupling Force and Motion Control in Industrial Robots
,”
Control Engineering Practice
, Vol.
1
, No.
6
, pp.
1019
–
1027
.
8.
Ferretti
G.
,
Maffezzoni
C.
,
Magnani
G.
, and
Rocco
P.
,
1994
a, “
Joint Stiffness Estimation Based on Force Sensor Measurements in Industrial Manipulators
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
116
, No.
1
, pp.
163
–
167
.
9.
Ferretti, G., Magnani, G., and Rocco, P., 1994b, “Estimation of resonant transfer functions in the joints of an industrial robot,” SICICA’94, Budapest, June, pp. 371–376.
10.
Khosla
P.
, and
Volpe
R.
,
1993
a, “
A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Explicit Force Control Strategies for Manipulators
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Controls
, Vol.
38
, No.
11
, pp.
1634
–
1650
.
11.
Khosla
P.
, and
Volpe
R.
,
1993
b, “
A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Impact Control for Manipulators
,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research
, Vol.
12
, No.
4
, pp.
351
–
365
.
12.
Murphy
S. H.
, and
Wen
J. T.
,
1991
, “
Stability Analysis of Position and Force Control for Robotic Arms
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Controls
, Vol.
36
, No.
3
, pp.
365
–
371
.
13.
Saridis, G. N., and Wedel, D. L., 1988, “An Experiment in Hybrid Position/Force Control of a Six DOF Revolute Manipulator,” IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Philadelphia, pp. 1638–1641.
14.
Youcef-Toumi
K.
, and
Gutz
D. A.
,
1994
, “
Impact and Force Control: Modeling and Experiments
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
116
, No.
1
, pp.
89
–
98
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.