Direct drive linear motors have good potential for use as next generation machine tool feed drives since they can increase machining rates and improve servo accuracy by eliminating gear related mechanical problems. To exploit the high speed and high response direct drives for machining, the servo control must achieve as high as possible tracking performance while at the same time establishing as much as possible the dynamic stiffness in order to maintain machining stability and reduce the effect of machining disturbance forces on the tool position. This paper investigates the use of optimal H∞ control to design for large stiffness and closed-loop tracking performance. Position feedback alone is first considered, with cutting force feedback later added to augment closed loop stiffness. Optimal position feedback is experimentally seen to achieve up to a 46 percent stiffness improvement over that achievable with proportional-derivative control. The addition of force feedback to the servo-loop resulted in a further 70 to 100 percent stiffness improvement over the position feedback alone values.

1.
Alter, D. M., 1994, Control of Linear Motors for Machine Tool Feed Drives, Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
2.
Alter, D. M., and Tsao, T-C, 1995, “Control of Linear Motors for Machine Tool Feed Drives: Optimal Feedforward Control for Tracking Improvement” submitted for publication, ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL.
3.
Alter
D. M.
, and
Tsao
T-C
,
1994
, “
Stability of Turning Processes with Actively Controlled Linear Motor Feed Drives
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
116
, No.
3
, pp.
298
307
.
4.
Doyle, J. C., Francis, B. A., and Tannenbaum, A. R., 1992, Feedback Control Theory, Macmillan Publishing, New York.
5.
Franklin, G. F., and Powell, J. D., 1981, Digital Control of Dynamic Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA, pp. 85–92.
6.
Maciejowski, J. M., 1989, Multivariable Feedback Design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 265–324.
7.
Merritt
H. E.
,
1965
, “
Theory of Self-Excited Machine Tool Chatter
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry
, Vol.
87
, No.
4
, pp.
447
454
.
8.
Srinivasan
K.
, and
Nachtigal
C. L.
,
1978
, “
Analysis and Design of Machine Tool Chatter Control Systems Using the Regenerative Spectrum
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
100
, pp.
191
200
.
9.
Vidyasagar, M., 1985, Control System Synthesis: A Factorization Approach, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10.
Zames
G.
, and
Francis
B. A.
,
1983
, “
Minimax Sensitivity, and Optimal Robustness
,”
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
, Vol.
28
, pp.
585
601
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.