Placing active circuitry directly underneath the bond pads is an effective way to reduce the die size, and hence to achieve lower cost per chip. The main concern with such design is the possible mechanical damage to the underlying circuitry during the wire bonding process. For example, the initial bond force and subsequent ultrasonic vibration may cause cracks within the dielectric layer. The cracks can penetrate through the active circuitry underneath, resulting in electrical failures to the silicon device. In this paper, a finite element based methodology was developed to study the stress behavior of bond pad structures during thermosonic wire bonding. The focus of our analysis is on dielectric layer crack, which was the dominant failure mode observed. The finite element (FE) model is 3-D based and contains the wire ball, the bond pad, and the underpad structure. The model was subjected to various bond force/ultrasound conditions, and the stresses were compared with the percentage of cracked pads in the real life bonding experiments. By using the volume-averaged, incremental first principal stress at the dielectric layer as the stress criterion, we achieved a reasonably good correlation with the experiments. In addition, we found that the dynamic friction at the bond interface is critical in stress distributions at the bond pad. Based on this, we have provided an explanation on how stresses progress during a typical bond force. Furthermore, the stress progression pattern was shown to correlate well with the different crack patterns. The FE model established a baseline upon which more designs with bonding over active circuitry can be analyzed and evaluated for crack resistance to thermosonic wire bonding.

1.
Sauter
,
W.
,
Aoki
,
T.
,
Hisada
,
T.
,
Miyai
,
H.
,
Petrarca
,
K.
,
Beaulieu
,
F.
,
Allard
,
S.
,
Power
,
J.
, and
Agbesi
,
M.
, 2003, “
Problem With Wirebonding on Probe Marks and Possible Solutions
,”
Proc. Electronic Components and Technology Conference
, pp.
1350
1358
.
2.
Saran
,
M.
,
Cox
,
R.
,
Martin
,
C.
,
Ryan
,
G.
,
Kudoh
,
T.
,
Kanasugi
,
M.
,
Hortaleza
,
J.
,
Ibnabdeljalil
,
M.
,
Murtuza
,
M.
,
Capistrano
,
D.
,
Roderos
,
R.
, and
Macaraeg
,
R.
, 1998, “
Elimination of Bond-Pad Damage Through Structural Reinforcement of Intermetal Dielectrics
,”
Proc. IEEE 36th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium
, pp.
225
231
.
3.
Hess
,
K. J.
,
Downey
,
S. H.
,
Hall
,
G. B.
,
Lee
,
T.
,
Mercado
,
L. L.
,
Miller
,
J. W.
,
Ng
,
W. C.
, and
Wontor
,
D. G.
, 2003, “
Reliability of Bond Over Active Pad Structures for 0.13-μm CMOS Technology
,”
Proc. Electronic Components and Technology Conference
, pp.
1344
1349
.
4.
Jeon
,
I.
, and
Chung
,
Q.
, 2003, “
The Study on Failure Mechanisms of Bond Pad Metal Peeling: Part A—Experimental Investigation
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
0026-2714,
43
, pp.
2047
2054
.
5.
Jeon
,
I.
, 2003, “
The Study on Failure Mechanisms of Bond Pad Metal Peeling: Part B—Numerical Analysis
,”
Microelectron. Reliab.
0026-2714,
43
, pp.
2055
2064
.
6.
Jeon
,
I.
,
Chung
,
Q.
,
Hong
,
J.
, and
Byun
,
K.
, 2001, “
The Effect of Ultrasonic Power on Bonding Pad and IMD Layers in Ultrasonic Wire Bonding
,”
Proc. Int’l Symposium on Electronic Materials and Packaging
, pp.
235
242
.
7.
Takahashi
,
Y.
, and
Inoue
,
M.
, 2002, “
Numerical Study of Wire Bonding—Analysis of Interfacial Deformation Between Wire and Pad
,”
J. Electron. Packag.
1043-7398,
124
, pp.
27
36
.
8.
Liu
,
Y.
,
Irving
,
S.
, and
Luk
,
T.
, 2004, “
Thermosonic Wire Bonding Process Simulation and Bond Pad Over Active Stress Analysis
,”
Proc. Electronic Components and Technology Conference
, pp.
383
391
.
9.
Yeh
,
C. L.
,
Lai
,
Y. S.
, and
Wu
,
J. D.
, 2003, “
Dynamic Analysis of Wirebonding Process on Cu/Low-K Wafers
,”
Proc. Electronic Packaging Technology Conference
, pp.
282
285
.
10.
ANSYS 9.0 User’s Manual, ANSYS, Inc., 2004.
11.
Joshi
,
K. C.
, 1971, “
The Formation of Ultrasonic Bonds Between Metals
,”
Weld. J. (Miami, FL, U.S.)
0043-2296,
50
, pp.
840
848
.
12.
Microelectronics Packaging Material Database, Update 34, Center for Information and Numerical Data Analysis and Synthesis (CINDAS), Purdue Research Foundation, 2002.
13.
Kim
,
S.
, and
Hemati
,
N.
, 1994, “
In-Process Modeling of Ultrasonic Wire Bonders
,”
Structural Analysis in Microelectronics and Fiber Optics
,
ASME
,
New York
, EEP-Vol.
8
, pp.
31
40
.
14.
Schneuwly
,
A.
,
Groning
,
P.
,
Schlapbach
,
L.
, and
Muller
,
G.
, 1998, “
Bondability Analysis of Bond Pads by Thermoelectric Temperature Measurements
,”
J. Electron. Mater.
0361-5235,
27
(
11
), pp.
1254
1261
.
15.
Harman
,
G.
, and
Albers
,
J.
, 1977, “
The Ultrasonic Welding Mechanism as Applied to Aluminum- and Gold-Wire Bonding in Microelectronics
,”
IEEE Trans. Parts, Hybrid and Pack.
,
PHP-13
(
4
), pp.
406
412
.
16.
Krzanowski
,
J. E.
,
Razon
,
E.
, and
Hmiel
,
A. F.
, 1998, “
The Effect of Thin Film Structure and Properties on Gold Ball Bonding
,”
J. Electron. Mater.
0361-5235,
27
(
11
), pp.
1211
1215
.
17.
Langenecker
,
B.
, 1966, “
Effects of Ultrasound on Deformation Characteristics of Metals
,”
IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason.
0018-9537,
SU-13
(
1
), pp.
1
7
.
You do not currently have access to this content.