The sand production problem is plaguing the petroleum industry by its adverse effects on thousands of oil and gas fields throughout the world. A tremendous amount of money is spent each year on attempts to predict and control sand influx and/or repair wells and equipment damaged by sand. Sand inflow into the well during production leads to casing abrasion and failure, formation damage and distortion, and frequent sand removal and cleaning. The sand control process has a major influence on the type of the well completion design and it influences the guidelines for the completion process. In addition, many wells are currently being produced below their potential in order to restrict sand influx or erosion, and/or as a result of poorly designed or installed sand control methods. Evidently, the sand prediction and control problem is exceedingly complex and suggests the use of heuristics and the appropriateness of the expert systems technology. An automated sand control consultant and expert system has been developed. The system is aimed at assisting users in predicting sand occurrence during production and in selecting and designing the proper sand-exclusion treatments. The knowledge base of the system is based on an easy upgrade, easy expand format and involves four primary modules, thus giving the end-user greater flexibility to tentatively access and evaluate different scenarios of knowledge processing. Input data can range from “not known” formation characteristics and/or well stimulation requirements, for which the system gives conservative recommendations based on the remaining known facts, completion characteristics of the hole, well history, and geological probability; to cases with detailed information available, in which case very elaborate and precise recommendations are prescribed. This paper describes the knowledge involved in various modules of the sanding system, as well as future plans and further developments.

1.
Islam, M. R., and George, A. E., “Sand Control in Horizontal Wells in Heavy Oil Reservoirs,” SPE-18789, Proceedings, SPE California Regional Meeting, Bakerfield, CA, April 5–7, 1989, pp. 437–452.
2.
Dusseault, M. B., and Santarelli, F. J., “A Conceptual Model for Massive Solids Production in Poorly-Consolidated Sandstones,” Rock at Great Depth, Maury & Fourmaintraux, eds., 1989 Balkema, Rotterdam. ISBN 90 6191 975 4, pp. 789–797.
3.
Kanj, M., Zaman, M., and Roegiers, J.-C., “On Developing An Expert System For Sand Control,” Proceedings, 7th Oklahoma Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Stillwater, OK, November 18–19, 1993, pp. 275–281.
4.
Kanj, M., “SITEX: The Sand Inflow Treatment Expert,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 1995.
5.
Waterman, D., A Guide to Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 1986.
6.
Slatter, P. E., Building Expert Systems: Cognitive Emulation, John Wiley and Sons, England, 1987.
7.
Badiru, A. B., Expert Systems Applications in Engineering and Manufacturing, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992.
8.
Luger, G., and Stubblefield, W., Artificial Intelligence: Structures and Strategies for Complex Problem Solving, The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Redwood City, CA, 1993, 740 pp.
9.
Ahmad
S. I.
, “
Perspectives on Knowledge Engineering
,”
International Journal of Science Technology
, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, Spring
1988
, p.
19
19
.
10.
Kanj, M., Webber, S., Zaman, M., and Roegiers, J.-C., “The Sand Inflow Treatment and Hydraulic Fracturing Expert Systems,” a final research report submitted to the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology, Apr. 1995.
11.
Penberthy, W. L., Jr., and Shaughnessy, C. M., Sand Control, SPE Series on Special Topics, Vol. 1, Richardson, TX, 1992.
12.
Tovar, J. J., “Development of Knowledge-Based System for Sand Production Prediction,” M.Sc. thesis, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, Oct, 1991.
13.
Massie, I., Nygaard, O., and Morita, N., “Gulfaks Sub-Sea Wells: An Operator Implementation of a New Sand Production Prediction Model,” SPE-16893, Proceedings, SPE Annual Technical Conference Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Sept. 1987, pp. 159–168.
14.
Edwards, D., Mechanical Properties Evaluation and Its Applications, Schlumberger Technical Services Inc., European Unit, Interpretation Development, Nov. 1984.
15.
Weissemberger, K., Morita, N., Martin, A., and Whitfill, D., “The Engineering Approach to Sand Production Prediction,” SPE-16892, Proceedings, 62nd Annual SPE Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Sept. 1989, pp. 151–158.
16.
Edwards, D., and Corbin, N., “A Method of Combining Log Analysis, Core Data and Stress Measurements for the Purpose of Identifying Intervals of Potential Sand Influx,” technical paper prepared for an in-house presentation at Societe Nationale ELF AQUITAINE(P), Boussens, France, May 1989.
17.
Morita, N., Whitfill, D. L., Massie, I., and Knudsen, T. W., “Realistic Sand-Production Prediction: Numerical Approach,” SPE-16989, SPE Proceedings 62nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, September 27–30, 1987, pp. 547–559.
18.
Morita
N.
,
Whitfill
D. L.
,
Fedde
O. P.
, and
Lovik
T. H.
, “
Parametric Study if Sand-Production Prediction: Anlytical Approach
,”
SPE Production Engineering
, AIME Vol.
287
, Feb.
1989
, pp.
25
33
.
19.
Stein
N.
, and
Hilchie
D. W.
, “
Estimating the Maximum Production Rate Possible From Friable Sandstones, Without Using Sand Control
,”
JPT
, Vol.
24
, No.
3
, Sept.
1972
. pp.
1157
1160
.
20.
Stein
N.
,
Odeh
A. S.
, and
Jones
L. G.
, “
Estimating Maximum Sand-Free Production Rates From Friable Sand for Different Well Completion Geometries
,”
JPT
Vol.
28
, No.
4
, Oct.
1974
, pp.
1156
1158
.
21.
Stein
N.
,
Mechanical Properties of Friable Sand From Conventional Log Data
,
JPT
, Vol.
28
, No.
1
, July
1976
, pp.
757
763
.
22.
Stein
N.
, “
Estimate Formation Strength Using Log Data
,”
World Oil Magazine
, Vol.
205
, No.
5
, Nov.
1987
, pp.
39
40
.
23.
Stein
N.
, “
Determine Properties of Friable Formation Sands
,”
World oil Magazine
, Vol.
206
, No.
3
, Mar.
1988
, pp.
33
37
.
24.
Stein
N.
, “
Calculate Drawdown that Will Cause Sand Production
,”
World Oil Magazine
, Vol.
206
, No.
4
, Apr.
1988
, pp.
48
49
.
25.
Geertsma, J., “Some Rock-Mechanical Aspects of Oil and Gas Well Completions,” ASME Proceedings, European Offshore Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, London, England, October 24–27, 1978, pp. 301–310.
26.
Bratli, R., and Risnes, R., “Stability and Failure of Sand Arches,” SPE-84 Proceedings, 54th Annual Fall Technical Conference of the SPE of AIME, Las Vegas, NV, September 23–26, 1979, pp. 1–16.
27.
Suman, G. O., Jr., Ellis, R. C., and Snyder, R. E., Sand Control Handbook, Gulf Publishing Company, 2nd Edition, Houston, TX, 1983.
28.
Patel Y. K., Troncoso, J. C., Saucier, R. J., and Credeur, D. J., “High-Rate Pre-Packing Using Non-Viscous Carrier Fluid Results in Higher Production Rates in South Pass Block 61 Field,” SPE-28531, Proceedings, 69th Annual Technology Conference and Exhibition of the SPE, New Orleans, LA, September 25–28, 1994, pp. 137–152.
29.
Ledlow, L. B., Johnson, M. H., Richard, B. M., and Huval, T. J., “High-Pressure Packing with Water: An Alternative Approach to Conventional Gravel Packing,” SPE-26543, Proceedings, 68th Annual Technology Conference and Exhibition of the SPE. Houston, TX, October 3–6, 1993, pp. 333–343.
30.
Restarick
H. L.
,
Fowler
S. H.
, and
Sedotal
W. P.
, “
Through-Tubing Sand-Control Techniques Reduce Completion Costs
,”
SPE Drilling and Completion
, Vol.
9
, No.
4
, Dec.
1994
, pp.
236
243
.
31.
Fletcher, P. A., Montgomery, C. T., Ramos, G. G., Miller, M. E., and Rich, D. A., “Using Fracturing as a Technique for Controlling Formation Failure,” SPE-27899, Proceedings, Western Regional Meeting of the SPE, Long Beach, CA, March 23–25, 1994, pp. 511–519.
32.
Saucier
R. J.
, “
Considerations in Gravel Pack Design
,”
JPT
, Vol.
26
, No.
2
, Feb.
1974
, pp.
205
212
.
33.
Schwartz
D. H.
, “
Successful Sand Control Design for High Rate Oil and Water Wells
,”
JPT
, Vol.
21
, No.
3
, Sept.
1969
, pp.
1193
1198
.
34.
Stein
N.
, “
Designing Gravel Packs for Changing Well Conditions
,”
World Oil
, Vol.
196
, No.
2
, Feb. 1,
1983
, pp.
41
47
.
35.
Coberly, C. J., and Wagner, E. M., “Some Considerations in the Selection and Installation of Gravel Packs for Oil Wells,” Petroleum Technology, AIME Technical Publications, No. 960, Aug. 1938, pp. 1–20.
36.
Gulati
M.
, and
Maly
G.
, “
Thin-Section and Permeability Studies Call for Smaller Gravel in Gravel-Packing
,”
JPT
, Vol.
27
, No.
1
, Jan.
1975
, pp.
107
112
.
37.
Maly
G.
,
Robinson
J.
, and
Laurie
A.
, “
New Gravel Pack Tool for Improving Pack Placement
,”
JPT
, Vol.
26
, No.
1
, Jan
1974
, pp.
19
24
.
38.
Blackburn, C. R., Abel, J. C., and Day, R., “An Expert System to Design and Evaluate Matrix Acidizing,” SPE-20337, Proceedings. 5th SPE Petroleum Computer Conference. Denver, CO, June 25–28, 1990, pp. 103–108.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.