Thermodynamic, geometric, and economic models are developed for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell system for use in cogeneration applications in multi-unit residential buildings. The models describe the operation and cost of the fuel processing sub-system and the fuel cell stack sub-system. The thermodynamic model reflects the operation of the chemical reactors, heat exchangers, mixers, compressors, expanders, and stack that comprise the PEMFC system. Geometric models describe the performance of a system component based on its size (e.g., heat exchanger surface area), and, thus, relate the performance at off-design conditions to the component sizes chosen at the design condition. Economic models are based on data from the literature and address the cost of system components including the fuel processor, the fuel cell materials, the stack assembly cost, the fuel cost, etc. As demonstrated in a forthcoming paper, these models can be used in conjunction with optimization techniques based on decomposition to determine the optimal synthesis and design of a fuel cell system. Results obtained using the models show that a PEMFC cogeneration system is most economical for a relatively large cluster of residences (i.e. 50) and for manufacturing volumes in excess of 1500 units per year. The analysis also determines the various system performance parameters including an electrical efficiency of 39% and a cogeneration efficiency of 72% at the synthesis/design point.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, cogeneration, optimisation, energy conservation, thermodynamics
Topics:
Combined heat and power, Design, Proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Heat exchangers, Compressors, Optimization
1.
Oyarzabal, B., von Spakovsky, M. R., and Ellis, M. W., 2002, “The Optimal Synthesis/Design of a PEM Fuel Cell Cogeneration System for Multi-Unit Residential Applications—Application of a Decomposition Strategy,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., ASME, N.Y., N.Y., accepted for publication.
2.
Jianguo, X., and Gilbert, F. F., 1989, “Methane Steam Reforming, Methanation and Water-Gas Shift: I. Intrinsic Kinetics,” AIChE J., 35(1).
3.
Jianguo, X., and Gilbert, F. F., 1989, “Methane Steam Reforming: II. Diffusional Limitations and Reactor Simulation,” AIChE J., 35(1).
4.
Gunes, M. B., 2001, “Investigation of a Fuel Cell Based Total Energy System for Residential Applications,” Masters Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
5.
Oyarza´bal, B., 2001, “Application of a Decomposition Strategy to the Optimal Synthesis/Design of a Fuel Cell Sub-system,” M.S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
6.
Georgopoulos, N. G., 2002, “Application of a Decomposition Strategy to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of a Fuel Cell Based Total Energy System,” M.S. Thesis, Department Of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute And State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
7.
Georgopoulos, N., von Spakovsky, M. R., and Munoz, J. R., 2002, “A Decomposition Strategy Based on Thermoeconomic Isolation Applied to the Optimal Synthesis/Design and Operation of a Fuel Cell Based Total Energy System,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress And Exposition—IMECE’2002, ASME Paper No. 33320, N.Y., N.Y., November.
8.
Moran, M. J., and Shapiro, H. N., 1996, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 3rd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
Barbir
,
F.
, and
Gomez
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Efficiency and Economics of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
22
(
10/11
), pp.
1027
–
1037
.
10.
Geyer, H. K., and Ahluwalia, R. K., 1998, “GCtool for Fuel Cell Systems Design and Analysis—User Documentation,” Argonne, IL: Argonne National Laboratory.
11.
Odgen, J. M., 1996, “Hydrogen Energy Systems Studies,” Princeton University for U.S. Department of Energy, August.
12.
Oei, D., 1997, “Direct Hydrogen Fueled Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System For Transportation Applications,” Ford Motor Company For U.S. Department Of Energy, July.
13.
Ekdunge
,
P.
, and
Raberg
,
M.
,
1998
, “
The Fuel Cell Vehicle Analysis of Energy Use, Emissions and Cost
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
23
(
5
), pp.
381
–
385
.
14.
Mun˜oz
,
J. R.
, and
von Spakovsky
,
M. R.
,
2002
, “
Decomposition in Energy System Synthesis/Design Optimization for Stationary and Aerospace Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
39
(
6
),
Nov–Dec
Nov–Dec
.
15.
Munoz, J. R., and von Spakovsky, M. R., 2001, “The Use of a Decomposition Approach for the Large-Scale Synthesis/Design Optimization of Highly Coupled, Highly Dynamic Energy Systems,” International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics, 4(1).
16.
Munoz, J. R., and von Spakovsky, M. R., 2001, “The Application of Decomposition to the Large-Scale Synthesis/Design Optimization of Aircraft Energy Systems,” International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics, 5(1).
17.
El-Sayed
,
Y.
,
1989
, “
A Decomposition Strategy for Thermoeconomic Optimization, ASME Application
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
111
, pp.
1
–
15
.
18.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 1990, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.