Thin, sharp-edged disk models were evaluated in a low-speed two-dimensional adaptive flexible wall test section to determine the optimum adaptive wall testing environment for three-dimensional bluff-body models, by providing model testing recommendations for nominal solid blockage ratio and model span ratio. Drag coefficient measurements obtained under straight wall and adapted wall conditions showed that for a two-dimensional adaptive wall test section, the model span ratio imposes a more severe restriction upon model size than does the nominal solid blockage ratio. Minimum wall interference conditions were achieved with adapted walls for nominal solid blockage ratios less than 3 percent and model span ratios less than 21 percent, independent of the nominal test section aspect ratio, based on favorable comparison with previously-published experimental data. Data obtained under straight wall conditions confirmed that wall interference effects can only be neglected in conventional, straight-walled test sections for solid blockage ratios less than 0.5 percent and model span ratios less than 10 percent. The post-test boundary correction method of Maskell was successfully used to adjust the straight wall test section drag coefficient measurements of the larger models for wall interference effects, but no direct measurements of wall interference are used with this method. The results support the careful use of a two-dimensional wall adjustment strategy for three-dimensional nonlifting flows.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Testing, Drag (Fluid dynamics), Disks, Flow (Dynamics)
1.
Awbi
H. B.
, and
Tan
S. H.
,
1981
, “
Effect of Wind-Tunnel Walls on the Drag of a Sphere
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
103
, Sept., pp.
461
–
465
.
2.
Brundrett, E., and Kankainen, P., 1991, “The Construction and Commissioning of a Flexible Walled Wind Tunnel,” CASI Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, Sept.
3.
Fail, R., Lawford, J. A., and Eyre, R. C. W., 1957, “Low-Speed Experiments on the Wake Characteristics of Flat Plates Normal to an Air Stream,” Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda No. 3120.
4.
Goodyer, M. J., 1975, “A Low Speed Self-Streamlining Wind Tunnel,” Wind Tunnel Design and Testing Techniques, AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 174, Fluid Dynamics Panel Symposium, London, Oct.
5.
Hornung, H. G., ed., 1990, Adaptive Wind Tunnel Walls: Technology & Applications, AGARD Advisory Report No. 269, Fluid Dynamics Panel Working Group 12.
6.
Kankainen, P., and Brundrett, E., 1991, “Two-Dimensional Airfoil Testing in a Flexible Walled Wind Tunnel Facility,” Proceedings of the 3rd Canadian Symposium on Aerodynamics, Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute, Toronto, Canada, Nov.
7.
Kankainen
P.
, and
Brundrett
E.
, and
Kaiser
J. A.
,
1994
, “
A Small Wind Tunnel Significantly Improved by a Multi-Purpose Two Flexible Wall Test Section
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
116
, Sept., pp.
419
–
423
.
8.
Lamarche, L., and Wedemeyer, E., 1984, “Minimization of Wall Interference for Three-Dimensional Models with Two-Dimensional Wall Adaptation,” VKI TN 149.
9.
Lewis, M. C., 1988, “Aerofoil Testing in a Self-Streamlining Flexible Walled Wind Tunnel,” NASA CR 4128, 1988.
10.
Lewis, M. C., and Goodyer, M. J., 1991, “Two-Dimensional Wall Adaptation for Three-Dimensional Flows,” ICAW 1991, International Conference on Adaptive Wall Wind Tunnel Research and Wall Interference Correction, Xian, China, Proceedings, pp. A2-1-24.
11.
Lewis, M. C., Taylor, N. J., and Goodyer, M. J., 1992, “Adaptive Wall Technology for Three-Dimensional Models at High Subsonic Speeds and Aerofoil Testing Through the Speed of Sound,” Wind Tunnels and Wind Tunnel Test Techniques, European Forum on Wind Tunnels and Wind Tunnel Test Techniques, University of Southampton, U. K., September 1992, Royal Aeronautical Society, pp. 42.1–42.12.
12.
Maskell, E. C., 1963, “A Theory of the Blockage Effects on Bluff Bodies and Stalled Wings in a Closed Wind Tunnel,” Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda No. 3400.
13.
Saltzman
E. J.
, and
Ayers
T. G.
,
1982
, “
Review of Flight-to-Wind-Tunnel Drag Correlation
,”
Journal of Aircraft
, Vol.
19
, No.
10
, pp.
801
–
811
.
14.
Sumner, D., 1994, “An Experimental Investigation of Three-Dimensional Models in a Two-Dimensional Adaptive Wall Test Section,” M.A.Sc. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
15.
Wolf, S. W. D., 1991, “Adaptive Wall Technology for Minimization of Wind Tunnel Boundary Interferences—A Review,” ICAW, International Conference on Adaptive Wall Wind Tunnel Research and Wall Interference Correction, Xian, China, Proceedings, pp. A1-1-15.
16.
Wolf, S. W. D., and Goodyer, M. J., 1988, “Predictive Wall Adjustment Strategy for Two-Dimensional Flexible Walled Adaptive Wind Tunnel—A Detailed Description of the First One-Step Method,” NASA CR 181635.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1995
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.