State-of-the art dimensional metrology was used to measure the throat diameter and throat curvature of nine critical flow venturis (CFVs) with nominal throat diameters ranging from . The throat curvature was used in calculating the theoretical discharge coefficients, while the throat diameter was used in computing the experimental discharge coefficients. The nine CFVs were calibrated in dry air using two NIST primary flow standards with expanded uncertainties of 0.05% and 0.09%, respectively. The calibration data span a Reynolds number range from to , including laminar, transition, and turbulent flow regimes. By correcting for both the throat diameter and curvature, the agreement between predicted and measured discharge coefficients was less than 0.17% in the turbulent regime and less than 0.07% in the laminar regime.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: aaron.johnson@nist.gov
Article navigation
July 2008
Research Papers
Comparison Between Theoretical CFV Flow Models and NIST’s Primary Flow Data in the Laminar, Turbulent, and Transition Flow Regimes
Aaron Johnson,
e-mail: aaron.johnson@nist.gov
Aaron Johnson
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8361, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Search for other works by this author on:
John Wright
John Wright
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8361, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Search for other works by this author on:
Aaron Johnson
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8361, Gaithersburg, MD 20899e-mail: aaron.johnson@nist.gov
John Wright
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8361, Gaithersburg, MD 20899J. Fluids Eng. Jul 2008, 130(7): 071202 (11 pages)
Published Online: July 22, 2008
Article history
Received:
August 16, 2006
Revised:
May 18, 2007
Published:
July 22, 2008
Citation
Johnson, A., and Wright, J. (July 22, 2008). "Comparison Between Theoretical CFV Flow Models and NIST’s Primary Flow Data in the Laminar, Turbulent, and Transition Flow Regimes." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. July 2008; 130(7): 071202. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2903806
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Extended Angular Range of a Three-Hole Cobra Pressure Probe for Incompressible Flow
J. Fluids Eng (October,2008)
New Discharge Coefficient of Throat Tap Nozzle Based on ASME Performance Test Code 6 for Reynolds Number From 2.4 × 10 5 to 1.4 × 10 7
J. Fluids Eng (January,2014)
Extrapolation and Curve-Fitting of Calibration Data for Differential Pressure Flow Meters
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (February,2010)
Near Wall Measurements for a Turbulent Impinging Slot Jet (Data Bank Contribution
J. Fluids Eng (March,2001)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Fluid Mechanics
Engineering Practice with Oilfield and Drilling Applications
Cavitating Structures at Inception in Turbulent Shear Flow
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)