A prime requirement in the design of a modern gas turbine combustor is good combustion stability, especially near lean blowout (LBO), to ensure an adequate stability margin. For an aeroengine, combustor blow-off limits are encountered during low engine speeds at high altitudes over a range of flight Mach numbers. For an industrial combustor, requirements of ultralow NOx emissions coupled with high combustion efficiency demand operation at or close to LBO. In this investigation, a step swirl combustor (SSC) was designed to reproduce the swirling flow pattern present in the vicinity of the fuel injector located in the primary zone of a gas turbine combustor. Different flame shapes, structure, and location were observed and detailed experimental measurements and numerical computations were performed. It was found that certain combinations of outer and inner swirling air flows produce multiple attached flames, aflame with a single attached structure just above the fuel injection tube, and finally for higher inner swirl velocity, the flame lifts from the fuel tube and is stabilized by the inner recirculation zone. The observed difference in LBO between co- and counterswirl configurations is primarily a function of how the flame stabilizes, i.e., attached versus lifted. A turbulent combustion model correctly predicts the attached flame location(s), development of inner recirculation zone, a dimple-shaped flame structure, the flame lift-off height, and radial profiles of mean temperature, axial velocity, and tangential velocity at different axial locations. Finally, the significance and applications of anchored and lifted flames to combustor stability and LBO in practical gas turbine combustors are discussed.

1.
Bradley, D., Gaskell, P. H., and Lau, A. K. C., 1990, “A Mixedness-Reactedness Flamelet Model for Turbulent Diffusion Flames,” Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 685.
2.
Chen, R. H., and Driscoll, J. F., 1988, “The Role of the Recirculation Vortex in Improving Fuel-Air Mixing Within Swirling Flames,” Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 281.
3.
Durbin
M. D.
, and
Ballal
D. R.
,
1996
, “
Studies of Lean Blowout in a Step Swirl Combustor
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
118
, pp.
72
78
.
4.
Gollahalli, S. R., Savas, O., Huang, R. F., and Rodriguez Azara, J. L., 1985, “Structure of Attached and Lifted Gas Jet Flames in Hysteresis Region,” Twenty-First Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 295.
5.
Katta, V. R., and Roquemore, W. M., 1993, “Numerical Method for Simulating Fluid-Dynamic and Heat-Transfer Changes in Jet Engine Injector Feed-Arm Due to Fouling,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, p. 651.
6.
Katta
V. R.
,
Goss
L. P.
, and
Roquemore
W. M.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Investigations of Transitional H2/N2 Jet Diffusion Flames
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
32
, p.
84
84
.
7.
Katta, V. R., 1995, internal report in preparation.
8.
Leonard
B. P.
,
1979
, “
A Stable and Accurate Convective Modeling Procedure Based on Quadratic Upstream Interpolation
,”
Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
, Vol.
19
, p.
51
51
.
9.
Pan, J. C., Vangsness, M. D., Heneghan, S., and Ballal, D. R., 1991,“Scalar Measurements of Bluff Body Stabilized Flames Using CARS Diagnostics,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-302.
10.
Pitts, W. P., 1988, “Assessment of Theories for the Behavior and Blowout of Lifted Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames,” Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 809.
11.
Pitts, W. P., 1990, “Large-Scale Turbulent Structures and the Stabilization of Lifted Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames,” Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 661.
12.
Spalding
D. B.
,
1972
, “
A Novel Finite Difference Formulation for Difference Expressions Involving Both First and Second Derivatives
,”
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
, Vol.
4
, p.
551
551
.
13.
Sturgess
G. J.
,
Lesmerises
A. L.
,
Heneghan
S. P.
, and
Ballal
D. R.
,
1990
, “
Design and Development of a Research Combustor for Lean Blowout Research
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
114
, p.
13
13
.
14.
Sturgess, G. J., Sloan, D. G., Roquemore, W. M., Shouse, D., Lesmerises, A. L., Ballal, D. R., Heneghan, S. P., Vangsness, M. D., and Hedman, P. O., 1991, “Flame Stability and Lean Blowout—A Research Program Progress Report,” Paper No. 91-7037, Proceedings of Tenth ISABE, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
15.
Sturgess, G. J., and Shouse, D., 1993, “Lean Blowout Research in a Generic Gas Turbine Combustor With High Optical Access,” Paper No. 93-GT-332, to appear in the Transactions of the ASME.
16.
Takahashi, F., Mizomoto, M., Ikai, S., and Fukati, N., 1984, “Lifting Mechanism of Free Jet Diffusion Flames,” Twentieth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 295.
17.
Takahashi, F., Schmoll, W. J., and Vangsness, M. D., 1990, “Effects of Swirl on the Stability and Turbulent Structure of Jet Diffusion Flames,” Paper No. AIAA-90-0036.
18.
Takahashi, F., and Goss, L. P., 1992, “Near-Field Turbulent Structures and the Local Extinction of Jet Diffusion Flames,” Twenty-Fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, p. 351.
19.
Takahashi, F., Vangsness, M. D., and Belovich, V. M., 1992, “Conditional LDV Measurements in Swirling and Non-swirling Coaxial Turbulent Air Jets for Model Validation,” Paper No. AIAA-92-0580.
20.
Vanquickenborne
L.
, and
van Tiggelen
,
1966
, “
The Stabilization Mechanism of Lifted Diffusion Flames
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
10
, p.
59
59
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.