Satisfactory performance of the gas turbine combustor relies on the careful design of various components, particularly the fuel injector. It is, therefore, essential to establish a fundamental basis for fuel injection modeling that involves various atomization processes. A two-dimensional fuel injection model has been formulated to simulate the airflow within and downstream of the atomizer and address the formation and breakup of the liquid sheet formed at the atomizer exit. The sheet breakup under the effects of airblast, fuel pressure, or the combined atomization mode of the airassist type is considered in the calculation. The model accounts for secondary breakup of drops and the stochastic Lagrangian treatment of spray. The calculation of spray evaporation addresses both droplet heat-up and steady-state mechanisms, and fuel vapor concentration is based on the partial pressure concept. An enhanced evaporation model has been developed that accounts for multicomponent, finite mass diffusivity and conductivity effects, and addresses near-critical evaporation. The presents investigation involved predictions of flow and spray characteristics of two distinctively different fuel atomizers under both nonreacting and reacting conditions. The predictions of the continuous phase velocity components and the spray mean drop sizes agree well with the detailed measurements obtained for the two atomizers, which indicates the model accounts for key aspects of atomization. The model also provides insight into ligament formation and breakup at the atomizer exit and the initial drop sizes formed in the atomizer near field region where measurements are difficult to obtain. The calculations of the reacting spray show the fuel-rich region occupied most of the spray volume with two-peak radial gas temperature profiles. The results also provided local concentrations of unburned hydrocarbon (UHC) and carbon monoxide (CO) in atomizer flowfield, information that could support the effort to reduce emission levels of gas turbine combustors.

1.
Chin, J. S., 1994, “An Engineering Calculation Method for Multi-Component Stagnant Droplet Evaporation With Finite Diffusivity,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-440.
2.
Chin, J. S., 1995, “An Engineering Calculation Method for Turbine Fuel Droplet Evaporation at Critical Conditions With Finite Liquid Diffusivity,” AIAA Paper No. 95-0494.
3.
Dombrowski
N.
, and
Hooper
P. C.
,
1962
, “
The Effect of Ambient Density on Drop Formation in Sprays
,”
Chem. Eng. Science
, Vol.
17
, pp.
291
305
.
4.
Dombrowski
N.
, and
Johns
W. R.
,
1963
, “
The Aerodynamic Instability and Disintegration of Viscous Liquid Sheets
,”
Chem. Eng. Science
, Vol.
18
, pp.
203
214
.
5.
Faeth
G. M.
,
1977
, “
Current Status of Droplet and Liquid Combustion
,”
Prog. in Energy and Combustion Science
, Vol.
3
, pp.
191
224
.
6.
Fraser
R. P.
,
Eisenklam
P.
,
Dombrowski
N.
, and
Hasson
D.
,
1962
, “
Drop Formation From Rapidly Moving Liquid Sheets
,”
AIChE Journal
, Vol.
8
, No.
5
, pp.
672
680
.
7.
Jasuja
A. K.
,
1979
, “
Atomization of Crude and Residual Fuel Oils
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER
, Vol.
101
, pp.
250
258
.
8.
Jenkins, D. C., and Booker, J. D., 1965, The Time Required for High Speed Air Streams to Disintegrate Water Drops, Ministry of Aviation, Aeronautical Research Council, London, CP827.
9.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1989, Atomization and Spray, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
10.
McDonell
V. G.
, and
Samuelsen
G. S.
,
1991
a, “
Gas and Drop Behavior in Reacting and Non-reacting Airblast Atomizer Sprays
,”
AIAA J. Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
7
, No.
5
, pp.
684
691
.
11.
McDonell, V. G., and Samuelsen, G. S., 1991b, “Structure of Vaporizing Pressure Atomized Sprays,” University of California, Irvine, Internal Report.
12.
Mostafa
A. A.
, and
Mongia
H. C.
,
1987
, “
On the Modeling of Turbulent Evaporating Sprays: Eulerian Versus Lagrangian Approach
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
30
, No.
12
, pp.
2583
2593
.
13.
Pilch
M.
, and
Erdman
C. A.
,
1987
, “
Use of Breakup Time Data and Velocity History Data to Predict the Maximum Size of Stable Fragments for Acceleration Induced Breakup of Liquid Drop
,”
Multiphase Flow J.
, Vol.
13
, No.
6
, pp.
741
757
.
14.
Rizk, N. K., 1977, “Studies on Liquid Sheet Disintegration in Airblast Atomizers,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Cranfield Institute of Technology, England.
15.
Rizk
N. K.
, and
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1980
, “
Influence of Liquid Film Thickness on Airblast Atomization
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER
, Vol.
102
, pp.
706
710
.
16.
Rizk
N. K.
, and
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1983
, “
Influence of Atomizer Design Features on Mean Drop Size
,”
AIAA J.
, Vol.
21
, No.
8
, pp.
1139
1142
.
17.
Rizk
N. K.
, and
Lefebvre
A. H.
,
1985
, “
Internal Flow Characteristics of Simplex Swirl Atomizers
,”
AIAA J. of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
1
, No.
3
, pp.
193
199
.
18.
Rizk
N. K.
, and
Mongia
H. C.
,
1991
, “
Model for Airblast Atomization
,”
AIAA J. Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
7
, No.
3
, pp.
305
311
.
19.
Rizk, N. K., and Mongia, H. C., 1992, “Performance of Hybrid Airblast Atomizes Under Low Power Conditions,” AIAA Paper No. 92-0463.
20.
Rizk, N. K., 1994, “Model for Research Swirl Atomizers,” AIAA Paper No. 94-2777.
21.
Rizk, N. K., and Chin, J. S., 1994, “Comprehensive Fuel Nozzle Model,” AIAA Paper No. 94-3278.
22.
Simmons, H. C., 1979, “The Predictions of Sauter Mean Diameter for Gas Turbine Fuel Nozzles of Different Types,” ASME Paper No. 79-WA/GT-5.
23.
Srinivasan, R., Reynolds, R., Ball, I., Berry, R., Johnson, K., and Mongia, H., 1983, Aerothermal Modeling Program, Phase I Final Report, NASA CR-168243.
24.
Sturgess
S. A.
,
Syed
S. A.
, and
McMannus
K. R.
,
1984
, “
Calculation of a Hollow-Cone Spray in a Uniform Air Stream
,”
AIAA J. Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
1
, No.
5
, pp.
360
368
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.