It is well known that adding hydrogen to natural gas extends the lean limit of combustion and that in this way extremely low emission levels can be obtained: even the equivalent zero emission vehicle (EZEV) requirements can be reached. The emissions reduction is especially important at light engine loads. In this paper results are presented for a GM V8 engine. Natural gas, pure hydrogen and different blends of these two fuels have been tested. The fuel supply system used provides natural gas/hydrogen mixtures in variable proportion, regulated independently of the engine operating condition. The influence of the fuel composition on the engine operating characteristics and exhaust emissions has been examined, mainly but not exclusively for 10 and 20 percent hydrogen addition. At least 10 percent hydrogen addition is necessary for a significant improvement in efficiency. Due to the conflicting requirements for low hydrocarbons and low NOx, determining the optimum hythane composition is not straight-forward. For hythane mixtures with a high hydrogen fraction, it is found that a hydrogen content of 80 percent or less guarantees safe engine operation (no backfire nor knock), whatever the air excess factor. It is shown that to obtain maximum engine efficiency for the whole load range while taking low exhaust emissions into account, the mixture composition should be varied with respect to engine load. [S0742-4795(00)02001-9]

Issue Section:
Internal Combustion Engines
Keywords:
natural gas technology, emission, hydrogen, automobiles, internal combustion engines, fuel, performance evaluation
Topics:
Emissions, Engines, Fuels, Hydrogen, Natural gas, Nitrogen oxides
1.
Hoekstra, R. L., Collier, K., and Mulligan, N., 1994, “Demonstration of Hydrogen Mixed Gas Vehicles,” Proceedings, 10th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Cocoa Beach, Vol. 3, pp. 1781–1796.
2.
Hoekstra
,
R. L.
,
Collier
,
K.
,
Mulligan
,
N.
, and
Chew
,
L.
,
1995
, “
Experimental Study of a Clean Burning Vehicle Fuel
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
20
, No.
9
, pp.
737
–
745
.
3.
Hoekstra, R. L., Van Blarigan, P., and Mulligan, N., 1996, “ NOx Emissions and Efficiency of Hydrogen, Natural Gas and Hydrogen/Natural Gas Blended Fuels,” SAE Paper 961103.
4.
Swain, M. R., Yusuf, M., Du¨lger, Z., and Swain, M. N., 1993, “
The Effects of Hydrogen Addition on Natural Gas Engine Operation,” SAE Paper 932775.
5.
Yusuf, M., Swain, M. R., Swain, M. N., and Du¨lger, Z., 1997, “An Approach to Lean Burn Natural Gas Fuelled Engine Through Hydrogen Addition,” Proceedings, 30th ISATA Conference, Florence, paper 97EL081.
6.
Larsen
,
J. F.
and
Wallace
,
J. S.
,
1997
, “
Comparison of Emissions and Efficiency of a Turbocharged Lean-Burn Natural Gas and Hythane-Fuelled Engine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
, pp.
218
–
226
.
7.
Cattelan, A. I., and Wallace, J. S., 1994, “Hythane and CNG Fuelled Engine Exhaust Emission and Engine Efficiency Comparison,” Proceedings, 10th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Cocoa Beach, Vol. 3, pp. 1761–1770.
8.
Raman, V., Hansel, J., Fulton, J., Lynch, F., and Bruderly, D., 1994, “Hythane—An Ultra Clean Transportation Fuel,” Proceedings, 10th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Cocoa Beach, Vol. 3, pp. 1797–1806.
9.
Bell
,
S. R.
and
Gupta
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Extension of the Lean Operating Limit for Natural Gas Fuelling of a Spark Ignited Engine Using Hydrogen Blending
,”
Combust. Sci. Technol.
,
123
, pp.
23
–
48
.
10.
Milton
,
B. E.
and
Keck
,
J. C.
,
1984
, “
Laminar Burning Velocities in Stoichiometric Hydrogen and Hydrogen-Hydrocarbon Gas Mixtures
,”
Combust. Flame
,
58
, pp.
13
–
22
.
11.
Karim, G. A., 1996, “Hydrogen as an Additive to Methane for Engine Applications,” Proceedings, 11th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Stuttgart, Vol. 2, pp. 1921–1926.
12.
Heywood, J., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.