This paper describes an analytical method used to provide information concerning limiting flows for subsonic ejector nozzles. Three potential limiting flows have been identified and modeled using reduced control volume based analysis: (1) incipient reverse flow into the secondary inlet, (2) choked flow in the secondary inlet, and (3) choked flow in the exit mixing stream. Comparison of the methods developed here with the classical control volume portion of an ejector nozzle code have been performed and show good agreement. As such, it is concluded, that within the scope of one-dimensional control-volume based computations, that the methods developed here provide an efficient tool to help delimit the design space acceptable for ejector operation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2003
Technical Briefs
Subsonic Elector Nozzle Limiting Flow Conditions
L. J. De Chant, Research Engineer,
L. J. De Chant, Research Engineer,
Analytic Entrainment LLC, 1541 Summit Hills Drive, Albuquerque, NM 87112
Search for other works by this author on:
L. J. De Chant, Research Engineer,
Analytic Entrainment LLC, 1541 Summit Hills Drive, Albuquerque, NM 87112
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS for publication in the ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received by the AES Division June 2000; final revision received by the ASME Headquarters December 2002. Associate Editor: G. Reistad.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jul 2003, 125(3): 851-854 (4 pages)
Published Online: August 15, 2003
Article history
Received:
June 1, 2000
Revised:
December 1, 2002
Online:
August 15, 2003
Citation
De Chant , L. J. (August 15, 2003). "Subsonic Elector Nozzle Limiting Flow Conditions ." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. July 2003; 125(3): 851–854. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1581890
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
An Experimental Investigation on Combustion and Emissions of a Hydrogen Enriched Ammonia–Diesel Dual Fuel Engine at a Medium Load Condition
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September 2025)
Characterization of Knocking Pressure Data From Two Closely Spaced Transducers: Effect of Transducer Mounting
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September 2025)
Comparison of a Full-Scale and a 1:10 Scale Low-Speed Two-Stroke Marine Engine Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September 2025)
An Adjustable Elastic Support Structure for Vibration Suppression of Rotating Machinery
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (September 2025)
Related Articles
A Rational Method to Choose Optimum Design for Two-Dimensional Contractions
J. Fluids Eng (June,2002)
Erratum: “Numerical Simulation of Two-Phase Flow in Injection Nozzles: Interaction of Cavitation and External Jet Formation” [ Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125(6), pp. 963–969 ]
J. Fluids Eng (January,2006)
The Effects of Diesel Injector Needle Motion on Spray Structure
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2011)
Oscillatory Incompressible Fluid Flow in a Tapered Tube With a Free Surface in an Inkjet Print Head
J. Fluids Eng (January,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Internal and Near Nozzle Flow Simulations of Gasoline Multi-Hole Injector (ECN Spray G) with Transient Needle Motion
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
In-Nozzle Cavitation-Induced Orifice-to-Orifice Variations Using Real Injector Geometry and Gasoline-Like Fuels
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
In-Nozzle Flow Visualization of Marine Diesel Injector Nozzles with Different Inlet Radii
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)