The relatively innovative gas turbine based power cycles R-ATR and R-REF (Recuperative–Auto Thermal Reforming GT cycle and Recuperative–Reforming GT cycle) here proposed are mainly aimed to allow the upstream CO2 removal by the way of natural gas fuel reforming. The power unit is a gas turbine (GT), fueled with reformed and CO2 cleaned syngas produced by adding some basic sections to the simple GT cycle: • auto thermal reforming (ATR) for the R-ATR solution, where the natural gas is reformed into CO, H2,CO2,H2O, and CH4; this endothermic process is completely sustained by the heat released from the reactions between the primary fuel CH4, exhausts and steam. • water gas shift reactor (WGSR), where the reformed fuel is, as far as possible, shifted into CO2 and H2 by the addition of water. • water condensation, in order to remove a great part of the fuel gas humidity content (this water is totally reintegrated into the WGSR). • CO2 removal unit for the CO2 capture from the reformed fuel. Among these main components, several heat recovery units are inserted, together with GT cycle recuperator, compressor intercooler, and steam injection in combustion chamber. The CO2 removal potential is close to 90% with chemical scrubbing using an accurate choice of amine solution blend: the heat demand is completely provided by the power cycle itself. The possibility of applying steam blade cooling by partially using the water released from the dehumidifier downstream the WGSR has been investigated: in these conditions, the R-ATR has shown an efficiency range of 44–46%. High specific work levels have also been observed (around 450–550 kJ/kg). These efficiency values are satisfactory, especially if compared with ATR combined cycles with CO2 removal, more complex due to the steam power section. If regarded as an improvement to the simple GT cycle, R-ATR shows an interesting potential if directly applied to a current GT model; however, partial redesign with respect to the commercially available version is required. Finally, the effects of the reformed fuel gas composition and conditions on the amine CO2 absorption system have been investigated, showing the beneficial effects of increasing pressure (i.e., pressure ratio) on the thermal load per kg of removed CO2.

1.
Corti, A., Failli, L., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Exergy Analysis of Two Second-Generation SCGT Plant Proposals,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June.
2.
Corti, A., Lombardi, L., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Absorption of CO2 With Amines in a Semi-Closed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden, June.
3.
Corti, A., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Economic Analysis of a Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle (SCGT/CC) With CO2 Removal by Amines Absorption,” GHGT-4, 4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, InterLaken, Switzerland, Aug. 30–Sept. 2.
4.
Corti
,
A.
,
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Thermo-Economic Evaluation of the SCGT Cycle
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
40
, pp.
1917
1929
.
5.
Facchini, B., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1996; “Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle With Water Recovery,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-317.
6.
Facchini
,
B.
,
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1997
, “
SCGT/CC: An Innovative Cycle With Advanced Environmental and Peakload Shaving Features
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
38
(
15–17
), pp.
1647
1653
.
7.
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1999
, “
A New Semi-Closed Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2 Separation
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
40
, pp.
1669
1678
.
8.
Mathieu, Ph., Dechamps, P., and Distelmans, M., 1994, “Concepts and Applications of CO2 Gas Turbines,” Power-Gen Europe ’94, Cologne.
9.
Mathieu, Ph., Chefneux, E., and Dechamps, P., 1995, “Energy and Exergy Analysis of CO2 Based Combined Cycle Plants,” Proceedings of the Second Law Analysis of Energy Systems: Towards the 21st Century, Roma.
10.
Cau, G., and Cocco, D., 2000, “Performance Assessment of Semi-Closed Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Systems,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, May 8–11, Munich, Germany.
11.
Lozza, G., and Chiesa, P., 2000, “Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles. Part B: Steam-Methane Reforming,” ASME Paper No 2000-GT-0164.
12.
Andersen, T., Kvamsdal, M., and Bolland, O., 2000, “Gas Turbine Combined Cycle With CO2-Capture Using Auto-Thermal Reforming of Natural Gas,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, May 8–11, Munich, Germany.
13.
Lozza, G., and Chiesa, P., 2000, “Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles. Part A: Partial Oxidation,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0163.
14.
Carcasci, C., and Harvey, S., 1998, “Design Issues for the Methane-Steam Reformer of a Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycle,” ASME IGTI International Gas Turbine Congress, Stockholm.
15.
Tapinassi, L., 2001, “Studio di impianti di potenza innovativi con turbina a gas integrati con sistemi di rimozione della CO2 tramite conversione del metano in combustibile ad alto contenuto di idrogeno,” Graduation thesis, Environmental Engineering Faculty, Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, Italy (in Italian).
16.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Consonni
,
S.
,
1999
, “
Shift Reactors and Physical Absorption for Low-CO2 Emission IGCCs
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power
,
121, pp
295
305
.
17.
EFMA, 1995, “Best Available Techniques for Pollution Prevention and Control in the European Fertilizer Industry,” Booklet No. 1 of 8: “PRODUCTION OF AMMONIA”, copyright 1995—EFMA, European Fertilizer Manufacturers’ Association.
18.
IEA, 2000, “Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage,” Report from Department of Trade and Industry, Sept. on www.dti.gov.uk/cct.
19.
Adelman
,
S. T.
,
Hoffman
,
M. A.
, and
Baughn
,
J. W.
,
1995
, “
A Methane-Steam Reformer for a Basic Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power
,
117
, pp.
16
23
.
20.
Carcasci
,
C.
,
Facchini
,
B.
, and
Harvey
,
S.
,
1998
, “
Design Issues and Performance of a Chemically Recuperated Aeroderivative Gas Turbine
,”
Proc Instn Mech Engrs
,
212
,
Part A
Part A
.
21.
Fiaschi, D., and Lombardi, L., 2001, “Cellular Thermodynamic Model for Gas Turbine Blade Cooling,” Proceedings of ECOS 2001 Conference, July 4–6.
22.
Lombardi, L., 2000, “LCA Comparison of Technical Solutions for CO2 Emissions Reduction in Power Generation,” Ph.D. thesis, Dipartimento di Energetica “Sergio Stecco,” Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.
23.
Holland
,
M. L.
, and
De Bruyn
,
H. J.
,
1996
, “
Metal Dusting Failures in Methane Reforming Plant
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
66
, pp.
125
133
.
24.
Lai, G. Y., 1990, High Temperature Corrosion of Engineering Alloys, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 47–72.
25.
Holland, M. L., 2000, “Practical Experience With Countering Metal Dusting in a Methane Reforming Unit,” Mossgas (PTY) Ltd., Mossel Bay, South Africa, on http://www.mossgas.com/research/nace2000a.pdf.
26.
Aspen+, 2000, v. 10 User Manual, Aspentech TM.
27.
Kohl, A. L., and Riesenfeld, F. C., 1985, Gas Purification, 4th Ed., Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX.
You do not currently have access to this content.