Labyrinth seals are used in various kinds of turbo machines to reduce internal leakage flow. The working fluid, or the gas passing through the rotor shaft labyrinth seals, often generates driving force components that may increase the unstable vibration of the rotor. It is important to know the accurate rotordynamic force components for predicting the instability of the rotor-bearing-seal system. The major goals of this research were to calculate the rotordynamic force of a labyrinth seals utilizing a commercial CFD program and to further compare those results to an existing bulk flow computer program currently used by major US machinery manufacturers. The labyrinth seals of a steam turbine and a compressor eye seal are taken as objects of analysis. For each case, a 3D model with eccentric rotor was solved to obtain the rotordynamic force components. The leakage flow and rotor dynamics force predicted by CFX TASCFlow are compared with the results of the existing bulk flow analysis program DYNLAB. The results show that the bulk flow program gives a pessimistic prediction of the destabilizing forces for the conditions under investigation. Further research work will be required to fully understand the complex leakage flows in turbo machinery.

1.
Iwatsubo, T., 1980, “Evaluation of Instability Forces of Labyrinth Seals in Turbines or Compressors,” Proc. Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery, NASA CP-2133, Texas A&M University, pp. 139–167.
2.
Scharrer, J. K., 1987, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals: Part I—A Two Control Volume Model,” Proc. ASME 11th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Rotating Machinery Dynamics Volume Two, pp. 411–426.
3.
Childs, D. W., and Scharrer, J. K., 1987, “Theory Versus Experiment for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals: Part II—A Comparison to Experiment,” Proc. ASME 11th Biennial Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Rotating Machinery Dynamics Volume Two, pp. 427–434.
4.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
1988
, “
Evaluation of Aerodynamic Instability Mechanisms for Centrifugal Compressors—Part II: Advanced Analysis
,”
ASME J. Vib., Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des.
,
110
, No.
2
, pp.
207
212
.
5.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
1990
, “
A Method for Calculating Labyrinth Seal Inlet Swirl Velocity
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
112
, No.
3
, pp.
380
383
.
6.
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
Raju
,
K. V. S.
, and
Ramesh
,
K.
,
1999
, “
PC-Based Analysis ofTurbomachinery Vibration
,”
Shock Vib. Dig.
,
31
, No.
6
, pp.
449
454
.
7.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Hensel
,
S. J.
, and
Guidry
,
M. J.
,
1992
, “
Labyrinth Seal Rotordynamic Forces Using a Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Code
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
683
689
.
8.
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
Hensel
,
S. J.
, and
Guidry
,
M. J.
,
1993
, “
Three-Dimensional Computations of Rotordynamic Force Distribution I a Labyrinth Seal
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
36
, No.
3
, pp.
461
469
.
9.
Ishii
,
E.
,
Kato
,
C.
,
Kikuchi
,
K.
, and
Ueyama
,
Y.
,
1997
, “
Prediction of Rotordynamic Forces in a Labyrinth Seal Based on Three-Dimensional Turbulent Flow Computation
,”
JSME Int. J., Ser. C
,
40
, No.
4
, pp.
743
748
.
10.
Kwanka, K., Sobotzik, J., and Nordman, R., 2000, “Dynamic Coefficients of Labyrinth Gas Seals a Comparison of Experimental Results and Numerical Calculations,” ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine, Congress & Exhibition, 2000-GT-403.
11.
Moore, J. J., 2001, “Three-Dimensional CFD Rotordynamic Analysis of Gas Labyrinth Seals,” Proc. DETC’01, VIB-21394.
12.
Guo
,
Z.
,
Hirano
,
T.
, and
Kirk
,
R. G.
,
2003
, “
Application of CFD Analysis for Rotating Machinery, Part 1: Hydrodynamic, Hydrostatic Bearings and Squeeze Film Damper
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
127
, pp.
445
451
.
13.
AEA Technology, 2001, CFX-TASCflow 2.11.1 Documentation.
You do not currently have access to this content.