A dynamic solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) model was integrated with other system components (i.e., reformer, anodic off-gas burner, anodic ejector) to build a system model that can simulate the time response of the anode side of an integrated 250kW pressurized SOFC hybrid system. After model description and data on previous validation work, this paper describes the results obtained for the dynamic analysis of the anodic loop, taking into account two different conditions for the fuel flow input: in the first case (I), the fuel flow follows with no delay the value provided by the control system, while in the second case (II), the flow is delayed by a volume between the regulating valve and the anode ejector, this being a more realistic case. The step analysis was used to obtain information about the time scales of the investigated phenomena: such characteristic times were successfully correlated to the results of the subsequent frequency analysis. This is expected to provide useful indications for designing robust anodic loop controllers. In the frequency analysis, most phase values remained in the 0180deg range, thus showing the expected delay-dominated behavior in the anodic loop response to the input variations in the fuel and current. In Case I, a threshold frequency of 5Hz for the pressure and steam to carbon ratio and a threshold frequency of 31Hz for the anodic flow were obtained. In the more realistic Case II, natural gas pipe delay dominates, and a threshold frequency of 1.2Hz was identified, after which property oscillations start to decrease toward null values.

1.
Costamagna
,
P.
,
Magistri
,
L.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2001, “
Design and Part Load Performance of a Hybrid System Based on a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Reactor and a Micro Gas Turbine
,”
J. Power Sources
0378-7753,
96
, pp.
352
368
.
2.
Magistri
,
L.
,
Traverso
,
A.
,
Cerutti
,
F.
,
Bozzolo
,
M.
,
Costamagna
,
P.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2005, “
Modelling of Pressurised Hybrid Systems Based on Integrated Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (IP-SOFC) Technology
,”
Fuel Cells, Topical Issue Modelling of Fuel Cell Systems
, Vol.
1
,
Wiley-VCH
,
Weinheim
.
3.
Ferrari
,
M. L.
,
Traverso
,
A.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2005, “
Control System for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems
,” ASME Paper No. 2005-GT-68102.
4.
Muller
,
F.
,
Brouwer
,
J.
,
Jabbari
,
F.
, and
Samuelsen
,
S.
, “
Dynamic Simulation of an Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Including Current-Based Fuel Flow Control
,” ASME Paper No. FUELCELL2005-74107.
5.
Travis
,
R.
,
Balestrino
,
C.
,
Hill
,
R.
, and
Bernardi
,
D.
, 2006, “
Development of a 1MW SOFC System at Rolls-Royce Fuel Cell Systems
,”
Fuel Cell Conference
,
Lucerne, Switzerland
.
6.
Magistri
,
L.
,
Bozzolo
,
M.
,
Tarnowski
,
O.
,
Agnew
,
G.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2003, “
Design and Off-Design Analysis of a MW Hybrid System Based on Rolls-Royce Integrated Planar SOFC
,” ASME Paper No. GT-2003-38220.
7.
Traverso
,
A.
,
Trasino
,
F.
, and
Magistri
,
L.
, 2006, “
Dynamic Simulation of the Anodic Side of an Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System
,” ASME Paper No. ESDA2006-95770.
8.
Ferrari
,
M. L.
,
Traverso
,
A.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2004, “
Transient Analysis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Hybrids. Part B: Anode Recirculation Model
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53716.
9.
Ferrari
,
M. L.
,
Bernardi
,
D.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2006, “
Design and Testing of Ejectors for High Temperature Fuel Cell Hybrid Systems
,”
ASME J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol.
1550-624X,
3
, pp.
1
8
.
10.
Ferrari
,
M. L.
,
Pascenti
,
M.
, and
Massardo
,
A. F.
, 2006, “
Experimental Validation of an Unsteady Ejector Model for Hybrid Systems
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90447.
11.
Traverso
,
A.
, 2005, “
TRANSEO Code for the Dynamic Performance Simulation of Micro Gas Turbine Cycles
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68101.
You do not currently have access to this content.