This paper uses detailed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling with the kiva-chemkin code to investigate the influence of injection timing, combustion phasing, and operating conditions on combustion instability. Using detailed CFD simulations, a large design of experiments (DOE) is performed with small perturbations in the intake and fueling conditions. A response surface model (RSM) is then fit to the DOE results to predict cycle-to-cycle combustion instability. Injection timing had significant tradeoffs between engine efficiency, emissions, and combustion instability. Near top dead center (TDC) injection timing can significantly reduce combustion instability, but the emissions and efficiency drop close to conventional diesel combustion levels. The fuel split between the two direct injection (DI) injections has very little effect on combustion instability. Increasing exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rate, while making adjustments to maintain combustion phasing, can significantly reduce peak pressure rise rate (PPRR) variation until the engine is on the verge of misfiring. Combustion phasing has a very large impact on combustion instability. More advanced phasing is much more stable, but produces high PPRRs, higher NOx levels, and can be less efficient due to increased heat transfer losses. The results of this study identify operating parameters that can significantly improve the combustion stability of dual-fuel reactivity-controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engines.

References

1.
Kokjohn
,
S. L.
,
Hanson
,
R. M.
,
Splitter
,
D. A.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
2011
, “
Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI): A Pathway to Controlled High-Efficiency Clean Combustion
,”
Int. J. Engine Res.
,
12
(
3
), pp.
209
226
.
2.
Amsden
,
A. A.
,
1999
, “
kiva-3v, Release 2, Improvements to kiva-3v
,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report No. LA-UR-99-915.
3.
Beale
,
J. C.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
1999
, “
Modeling Spray Atomization With the Kelvin–Helmholtz/Rayleigh–Taylor Hybrid Model
,”
Atomization Sprays
,
9
(
6
), pp.
623
650
.
4.
Ra
,
Y.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
2008
, “
A Reduced Chemical Kinetic Model for IC Engine Combustion Simulations With Primary Reference Fuels
,”
Combust. Flame
,
155
(
4
), pp.
713
738
.
5.
Abani
,
N.
,
Munnannur
,
A.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
2008
, “
Reduction of Numerical Parameter Dependencies in Diesel Spray Models
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
130
(
3
), p.
032809
.
6.
Hanson
,
R. M.
,
Kokjohn
,
S. L.
,
Splitter
,
D. A.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
,
2010
, “
An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2010-01-0864.
7.
Dempsey
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Dual-Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) With Alternative Fuels
,” Ph.D. thesis in Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
8.
Splitter
,
D.
,
2012
, “
High Efficiency RCCI Combustion
,” Ph.D. thesis in Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
9.
Zhong
,
L.
,
Singh
,
I. P.
,
Han
,
J.
,
Lai
,
M.-C.
, and
Henein
,
N. A.
,
2003
, “
Effect of Cycle-to-Cycle Variation in the Injection Pressure in a Common Rail Diesel Injection System on Engine Performance
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2003-01-0699.
10.
Denis
,
G.
,
Josef
,
E.
, and
Ludwig
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Characterizing Injection System Behavior Under Real Operating Conditions
,” IMEchE Fuel Systems for IC Engines Conference, London, May 13–14.
11.
Kokjohn
,
S.
,
Reitz
,
R.
,
Splitter
,
D.
, and
Musculus
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Stratification for Controlling PCI Heat-Release Rates Using High-Speed Chemiluminescence Imaging and Fuel Tracer Fluorescence
,”
SAE Int. J. Engines
,
5
(
2
), pp.
248
269
.
You do not currently have access to this content.