All turbine blades have mistuned structures caused by manufacturing variations within the manufacturing tolerance, such as the geometrical deviations and variance of material properties. The mistuning effect has a known tendency to increase the dynamic stress, but it is also known to be difficult to predict the maximum vibration response before the operation. This paper studies the blade vibration of grouped blades in a low-pressure steam turbine. The study objectives are to characterize the vibration behavior of the grouped blade structure and to evaluate the maximum response of all blades in a stage experimentally. An experimental investigation is carried out in a vacuum chamber, and blades are excited by an air jet during start-up and shut-down. The circumferential blade amplitude distribution is measured by noncontact sensors (NCSs) and strain gauges (SGs). The circumferential blade amplitude distribution is found to differ depending on vibration modes and nodal diameters (NDs), but the relative tendency is almost the same for all types of operation at each mode and all NDs. Therefore, the median of all experimental results obtained with the NCSs is used in a comparison with calculation results and results of two theoretical curves obtained using equations from the literature. In comparing the measurement results and the calculation results, the circumferential blade amplitude distribution is not the same with all modes and NDs. However, the maximum amplitude magnification is about 1.5–1.8, and all measurement results are lower than the results for the two theoretical equations. This means the maximum response comparison to the tuned blade gives an evaluation on the safe side by the two theoretical equations.

References

1.
Gloger
,
M.
,
Neumann
,
K.
, and
Termuehlen
,
H.
,
1986
,
Design Criteria for Reliable Low-Pressure Blading
,
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
, pp.
1
9
.
2.
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Secall-Wimmel
,
T.
,
Dünck-Kerst
,
P.
,
Sonnenschein
,
A.
,
Regnery
,
D.
, and
Westfahl
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Scaling Concept for Axial Turbine Stages With Loosely Assembled Friction Bolts: The Linear Dynamic Assessment—Part 1
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27502.
3.
Weaver
,
F. L.
, and
Prohl
,
M. A.
,
1958
, “
High-Frequency Vibration of Steam-Turbine Buckets
,”
Trans. ASME
,
80
, pp.
181
194
.
4.
Wagner
,
L. F.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
1996
, “
Forced Harmonic Response of Grouped Blade Systems—Part 1: Discrete Theory
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
118
(1), pp.
130
136
.
5.
Kaneko
,
Y.
,
Mori
,
K.
,
Watanabe
,
E.
, and
Nagashima
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Vibrational Response Analysis of a Mistuned Bladed Disk (Grouped Blade)
,”
Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., C
,
63
(
610
), pp.
1887
1892
.
6.
Rzadkowski
,
R.
,
Maurin
,
A.
,
Kubitz
,
L.
, and
Szczepanik
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Forced Vibration of Mistuned Bladed Discs in Last Stage LP Steam Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-57427.
7.
Afolabi
,
D.
,
1988
, “
A Note on the Rogue Failure of Turbine Blades
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
122
(
3
), pp.
535
545
.
8.
Petrov
,
E. P.
, and
Ewins
,
D. J.
,
2003
, “
Analysis of the Worst Mistuning Patterns in Bladed Disk Assemblies
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
125
(4), pp.
623
631
.
9.
Whitehead
,
D. S.
,
1966
, “
Effect of Mistuning on the Vibration of Turbomachine Blades Induced by Wakes
,”
J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
,
8
(1), pp.
15
20
.
10.
Kenyon
,
J. A.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2001
, “
Forced Response of Turbine Engine Bladed Disks and Sensitivity to Harmonic Mistuning
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2001-0274.
11.
Hemberger
,
D.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Bauer
,
H.-J.
,
2012
, “
Investigating on Maximum Amplitude Amplification Factor of Real Mistuned Bladed Structures
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-68084.
12.
Heinz
,
C.
,
Schatz
,
M.
,
Casey
,
M.
, and
Stüer
,
H.
,
2011
, “
Impact of Mistuning on the Vibration Behaviour of the Last Stage in a Model Three Stage Low Pressure Steam Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45784.
13.
Drozdowski
,
R.
,
Völker
,
L.
,
Häfele
,
M.
, and
Vogt
,
D. M.
,
2015
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Nonlinear Vibrational Behavior of Steam Turbine Last Stage Blades With Friction Bolt Damping Elements
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2015-42244.
14.
Pohle
,
L.
,
Scheidt
,
L. P.
,
Wallaschek
,
J.
,
Aschenbruck
,
J.
, and
Seume
,
J. R.
,
2014
, “
Dynamic Behavior of a Mistuned Air Turbine: Comparison Between Simulations and Measurements
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26025.
15.
Saito
,
E.
,
Namura
,
K.
,
Takasumi
,
M.
,
Okabe
,
A.
, and
Ikeuchi
,
K.
,
1993
, “
Vibration Characteristics of Turbine Blades With Compound Periodic Structure
,”
Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., C
,
59
(
567
), pp.
3275
3282
.
16.
Saito
,
E.
,
Namura
,
K.
, and
Okabe
,
A.
,
1993
, “
Resonance Characteristics of Turbine Blades With Compound Periodic Structure
,”
International Conference on Power Engineering
, Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 12–16, pp.
449
454
.
17.
Hartung
,
A.
, and
Hackenberg
,
H.-P.
,
2016
, “
A Practical Approach for Evaluation of Equivalent Linear Damping From Measurements of Mistuned and/or Non-linear Stages and Forced Response Validation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56435.
18.
Anding
,
D.
,
Ressing
,
H.
,
Hörmeyer
,
K.
,
Pisch
,
R.
, and
Ziegler
,
K.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Novel Axial Compressor Generation for Industrial Applications—Part 2: Blade Mechanics
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26246.
19.
Kharyton
,
V.
, and
Bladh
,
R.
,
2014
, “
Using Tiptiming and Strain Gauge Data for the Estimation of Consumed Life in a Compressor Blisk Subjected to Stall-Induced Loading
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-27251.
20.
Kariya
,
D.
,
Yamamoto
,
T.
, and
Ishihara
,
K.
,
2009
, “
A Blade Resonance Prediction Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Calculation Method and Comparison With the Test
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59460.
21.
Sato
,
K.
,
Takasumi
,
M.
,
Kashiwabara
,
Y.
, and
Toriya
,
H.
,
1994
, “
Measurements of Blade Vibration for a Compressor Using a Noncontact Measurement System
,”
GTSJ Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng.
,
22
(
86
), pp.
48
54
.
22.
Zielinski
,
M.
, and
Ziller
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Noncontact Blade Vibration Measurement System for Aero Engine Application
,”
17th International Symposium on AirBreathing Engines
, Munich, Germany, Sept. 4–9, Paper No. ISABE-2005-1220.
23.
Kenyon
,
J. A.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2003
, “
Experimental Demonstration of Maximum Mistuned Bladed Disk Forced Response
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2003-38060.
24.
Kulkarni
,
A.
, and
LaRue
,
G.
,
2008
, “
Vibratory Response Characterization of a Radial Turbine Wheel for Automotive Turbocharger Application
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51355.
25.
Schoenenborn
,
H.
,
Retze
,
U.
,
Ziller
,
G.
, and
Waniczek
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Experimental and Analytical Mistuning Analysis of a Blisk at Lab Conditions and Under Rig Conditions Using Tip Timing
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22447.
26.
Heinz
,
C.
,
Schatz
,
M.
,
Casey
,
M.
, and
Stüer
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Experimental and Analytical Investigations of a Low Pressure Model Turbine During Forced Response Excitation
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22146.
27.
Dickmann
,
H.-P.
,
Wimmel
,
T. S.
,
Szwedowicz
,
J.
,
Filsinger
,
D.
, and
Roduner
,
C. H.
,
2005
, “
Unsteady Flow in a Turbocharger Centrifugal Compressor: 3D-CFD-Simulation and Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Impeller Blade Vibration
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68235.
28.
Rossi
,
M. R.
,
Feiner
,
D. M.
, and
Griffin
,
J. H.
,
2005
, “
Experimental Study of the Fundamental Mistuning Model for Probabilistic Analysis
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68127.
29.
Sever
,
I. A.
,
Petrov
,
E. E.
, and
Ewins
,
D. J.
,
2007
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Rotating Bladed Disk Forced Response Using Under-Platform Friction Dampers
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27307.
You do not currently have access to this content.