Abstract

As the supercritical CO2 power cycle develops and the component technologies mature, there is still a need to reduce the associated capital and operating costs to maintain a competitive levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) in order to enter the market. When considering concentrating solar power (CSP) coupled with an sCO2 power block and sensible thermal storage, the technology presents a clean source for utility-scale power generation to support baseload or peak-load electrical demand. However, the LCOE of the technology is still considered higher than the competing technologies and should be reduced to better compete in the market; 2030 targets for dispatchable solar plants are 5¢/kWh for baseload CSP and 10¢/kWh for peaker plants, as set by the United States Department of Energy. In response to this need, this study is targeting improvements in the power cycle precooler to reduce power block contribution to LCOE. This study considers a dry cooler, as CSP plants are sensitive to water consumption because many installations are slated for remote or arid locations where solar irradiance is very high, but water is scarce. Furthermore, the power block footprint for an sCO2 system is quite compact, especially as compared to a steam cycle. Therefore, there is interest in installing a more compact dry cooler that is proportional to the reduced footprint sCO2 power block, while conventional dry coolers are an order of magnitude larger. The competing goals of size, performance, and cost were considered in this study to develop a compact dry cooler that can easily be packaged with the power block, significantly reducing the installation and transport cost compared to the current state of the art, while maintaining or improving upon the heat transfer performance and impact on plant LCOE. This paper details the high-level findings of a large dry cooler sensitivity study for design point selection, design of the compact dry cooler, expected year-round performance for the dry cooler and the power cycle, and the predicted LCOE for a 30-year plant life. It was found that an aluminum heat exchanger core can be suitably designed to meet the pressure and temperature requirements for a precooler in an sCO2 recompression Brayton cycle. The dry cooler assembly was found to have improved heat transfer performance, allowing for increased cycle efficiencies and a reduced plant LCOE. When coupled with a centrifugal blower and compact transition duct, the dry cooler assembly was able to reduce the installation footprint by over 50%.

References

1.
Solar Energy Technologies Office,
2021
, “
2030 Solar Cost Targets
,” U.S. Department of Energy Report, Solar Energy Technologies Office, Washington, DC, accessed Dec. 20, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/goals-solar-energy-technologies-office
2.
Murphy
,
C.
,
Sun
,
Y.
,
Cole
,
W.
,
Maclaurin
,
G.
,
Turchi
,
C.
, and
Mehos
,
M.
,
2019
, “
The Potential Role of Concentrating Solar Power Within the Context of DOE's 2030 Solar Cost Targets
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Report No. NREL/TP-6A20-71912.
3.
Katcher
,
K.
, and
Patil
,
A.
, 2022, “Dry Cooler Contribution to LCOE in a sCO2 Power Cycle for CSP,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
, 2445, p.
090004
.10.1063/5.0086039
4.
Katcher
,
K.
,
Amogne
,
D.
, and
Patil
,
A.
,
2022
, “
Defining a Compact Dry Cooler Design to Reduce LCOE Contribution in a CSP Facility
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.,
epub.
5.
Bennett
,
J.
,
Wilkes
,
J.
,
Allison
,
T.
,
Pelton
,
R.
, and
Wygant
,
K.
,
2017
, “
Cycle Modeling and Optimization of an Integrally Geared sCO2 Compander
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63707.10.1115/GT2017-63707
6.
Dyreby
,
J.
,
Klein
,
S.
,
Nellis
,
G.
, and
Reindl
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Design Considerations for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles With Recompression
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
10
), p. 101701.10.1115/1.4027936
7.
Siddiqui
,
M. E.
, and
Almitani
,
K. H.
,
2018
, “
Energy Analysis of the S-CO2 Brayton Cycle With Improved Heat Regeneration
,”
MPDI: Processes
,
7
(
1
),
3
.10.3390/pr7010003
8.
Tom
,
B.
,
Smith
,
J.
, and
McClung
,
A. M.
,
2019
, “
Selecting the Optimum Supercritical CO2 Cycle for Indirect-Fired Applications
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2019-91509.10.1115/GT2019-91509
9.
Spadacini
,
C.
,
Pesatori
,
E.
,
Centemeri
,
L.
,
Lazzarin
,
N.
,
Macchi
,
R.
, and
Sanvito
,
M.
,
2018
, “
Optimized Cycle and Turbomachinery Configuration for an Intercooled, Recompressed sCO2 Cycle
,” Proceedings of the 6th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, Mar. 27–29, Paper No. 113.
10.
White
,
C. W.
,
Shelton
,
W. W.
,
Weiland
,
N. T.
, and
Shultz
,
T. R.
,
2018
, “
sCO2 Cycle as an Efficiency Improvement Opportunity for Air-Fired Coal Combustion
,” Proceedings of the 6th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, Mar. 27–29, Paper No. 135.
11.
Yang
,
Z.
,
Moullec
,
Y. L.
,
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Zhang
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
Dynamic Modeling of 5 MWe Supercritical CO2 Recompression Brayton Cycle
,”
AIP Conf. Proc.
2033
, p.
070003
.10.1063/1.5067089
12.
Katcher
,
K. M.
, and
Amogne
,
D.
, “
Impact of Dry Cooler Air-Side Performance on a sCO2 Power Cycle for a CSP Application
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2021-59936.10.1115/GT2021-59936
13.
Pidaparti
,
S. R.
,
White
,
C. W.
, and
Weiland
,
N. T.
,
2021
, “
Cooling System Cost and Performance Models to Minimize Cost of Electricity of Direct sCO2 Power Plants
,”
Proceedings of the 7th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium
, San Antonio, TX, Feb. 22–25, Paper No. 113.
14.
Neises
,
T.
,
2020
, “
Steady-State Off-Design Modeling of the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Recompression Cycle for Concentrating Solar Power Applications With Two-Tank Sensible-Heat Storage
,”
Sol. Energy
,
212
, pp.
19
33
.10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.041
15.
Schmitt
,
J.
,
Wilkes
,
J.
,
Allison
,
T.
,
Bennett
,
J.
,
Wygant
,
K.
, and
Pelton
,
R.
, 2017, “Lowering the Levelized Cost of Electricity of a Concentrating Solar Power Tower With a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-64958.10.1115/GT2017-64958
16.
Hoopes
,
K.
,
Sanchez
,
D.
, and
Crespi
,
F.
,
2016
, “
A New Method for Modeling Off-Design Performance of sCO2 Heat Exchangers Without Specifying Detailed Geometry
,”
Proceedings of the 5th International sCO2 Symposium in Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles
. San Antonio, TX, Mar. 29–31, pp.
1
14
.https://sco2symposium.com/papers2016/HeatExchanger/013pres.pdf
17.
Russick
,
E. M.
,
Poulter
,
G. A.
,
Adkins
,
C. L. J.
, and
Sorensen
,
N. R.
,
1996
, “
Corrosive Effects of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Cosolvents on Metals
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
18.
AMCA and ASHRAE
,
1999
,
Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating
,
ANSI/AMCA 210-99, ANSI/ASHRAE 51-1999, AMCA Publications
, Arlington Heights, IL.https://law.resource.org/pub/us/cfr/ibr/001/amca.210.1999.pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.