Abstract

Subsea centrifugal compressors commonly using labyrinth seals (LS) and pocket damper seals (PDS) must withstand the flow of oil in gas mixtures with a liquid volume fraction (LVF) up to 5%. This paper presents experimental results for the leakage and rotordynamic coefficients of a uniform clearance PDS and a similar size LS both supplied with wet gas. The shaft diameter D = 127 mm and the seal axial length L = 48 mm. In the tests, the seals' pressure ratio (inlet/exit) = 2.5, and the shaft speed reaches 5.25 krpm (surface speed = 35 m/s). The LS has a 17% larger radial clearance (Cr,LS = 0.230 mm > Cr,PDS = 0.196 mm) due to a manufacturing error. This paper extends prior work by Torres et al. (2022, “A Stepped Shaft Labyrinth Seal versus a Pocket Damper Seal: Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients Under Wet Gas Operation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 145(1), p. 011006) for the same two seal types with a stepped clearance configuration that promotes damping. When supplied with a dry gas, the LS leaks more because of its larger clearance. A loss coefficient (cd) is a fraction of the physical clearance that characterizes a seal's effectiveness in reducing leakage. The cd of both seals is nearly identical for operation with pure gas; the small differences are well within the experimental uncertainty. For operation with wet gas, the PDS cd decreases as the LVF increases whereas the LS cd increases, thus indicating the PDS is more effective to restrict wet gas leakage. When operating with pure gas, the direct stiffness (K) and effective damping (Ceff) of both seals are small in magnitude (K < 0.5 MN/m, Ceff < 2 kN-s/m) and often less than the experimental uncertainty. For wet gas operation and with shaft speed = 3 krpm and 5.25 krpm, the PDS produces Ceff < 0 for whirl frequencies below 50 Hz. In contrast, the LS Ceff > 0, although small in magnitude. The experimental results under wet gas operation are similar for operation with LVF equal to 3% and 5%. Unexpected low-frequency broadband motions appear when supplying the PDS with a wet gas. Although small in amplitude (<5 μm), the motions increase in severity as the mixture inlet LVF and shaft speed increase. The motions are entirely absent for tests with the LS. Experiments in which the mixture is drawn from the PDS cavities rule out liquid accumulation as the cause of the observed motions. The current test results serve as a reference for turbomachinery design engineers and aid in the validation of analytical predictive tools.

References

1.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Schultz
,
R. R.
,
1993
, “
A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery
,” ASME Paper No. DETC1993-018810.1115/DETC1993-0188.
2.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
1997
, “
Annular Gas Seals and Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 26th Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, Sept. 16–18, pp.
201
220
.10.21423/R1HT06
3.
Vannini
,
G.
,
Bertoneri
,
M.
,
Del Vescovo
,
G.
, and
Wilcox
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Centrifugal Compressor Rotordynamics in Wet Gas Conditions
,”
Proceedings of the 43rd Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, Sept. 23–25, pp.
201
220
.10.21423/R1F93J
4.
Vannini
,
G.
,
Bertoneri
,
M.
,
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Iudiciani
,
P.
, and
Stronach
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Results and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Labyrinth and Pocket Damper Seals for Wet Gas Compression
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
5
), p.
052501
.10.1115/1.4031530
5.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
,
2022
, “
Annular Clearance Gas Seals in the 21st Century: A Review of the Experimental Record on Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients, Including Comparisons of Model Predictions to Test Data
,”
Proceedings of the 51th Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, Sept. 13–15.https://rotorlab.tamu.edu/TRIBGROUP/TPS%20papers/2022%20TPS%20Tutorial%20Gas%20Seals%20paper.pdf
6.
Ransom
,
D.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Andrés
,
L. S.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for a Two-Bladed Labyrinth Seal and a Four-Pocket Damper Seal
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
(
2
), pp.
370
376
.10.1115/1.2833949
7.
Ertas
,
B. H.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
2007
, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for a New Damper Seal Design
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
129
(
2
), pp.
365
374
.10.1115/1.2464138
8.
Yang
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Lu
,
X.
,
2021
, “
On the Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Novel Stepped Shaft Pocket Damper Seal: Experimental and Numerical Verification
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
143
(
3
), p.
031002
.10.1115/1.4048459
9.
Delgado
,
A.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Yang
,
J.
, and
Thiele
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Experimental Force Coefficients for a Fully-Partitioned Pocket Damper Seal and Comparisons to Other Two Seal Types
,” ASME Paper No. GT2022-82280.10.1115/GT2022-82280
10.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Lu
,
X.
, and
Jie
,
Z.
,
2018
, “
Leakage and Force Coefficients for Pump Annular Seals Operating With Air/Oil Mixtures: Measurements vs Predictions and Air Injection to Increase Seal Dynamic Stiffness
,”
Second Asia Turbomachinery and Pump Symposium, The Turbomachinery Laboratory
, Singapore, Mar.
13
15
.https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/175007
11.
Zhang
,
M.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2020
, “
A Study for Rotordynamic and Leakage Characteristics of a Long-Honeycomb Seal With Two-Phase, Mainly Air Mixtures
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
1
), p.
011021
.10.1115/1.4044947
12.
Yang
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Lu
,
X.
,
2019
, “
Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Pocket Damper Seal Operating Under a Wet Gas Condition: Tests Versus Prediction
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
11
), p.
111001
.10.1115/1.4044307
13.
Torres
,
J.
,
2022
, “
Leakage and Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of a Pocket Damper Seal and Labyrinth Seal Operating With Wet Gas
,” M.S. thesis,
Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
14.
Torres
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Yang
,
J.
,
2022
, “
A Stepped Shaft Labyrinth Seal vs. a Pocket Damper Seal: Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients Under Wet Gas Operation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
145
(
1
), p.
011006
.10.1115/1.4055665
15.
Andrés
,
L. S.
,
Wu
,
T.
,
Barajas-Rivera
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
J.
, and
Kawashita
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Leakage and Cavity Pressures in an Interlocking Labyrinth Gas Seal: Measurements Versus Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
10
), p.
101007
.10.1115/1.4044284
16.
Yang
,
J.
, and
Andrés
,
L. S.
,
2021
, “
An Analytical Two-Phase Flow Model for Prediction of Leakage in Wet Gas Labyrinth Seals and Pocket Damper Seals. Is Simplicity Still Desired?
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
143
(
12
), p.
121016
.10.1115/1.4051916
17.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
2010
, “
Experimental Identification of Bearing Force Coefficients
,” Modern Lubrication Theory, Notes 14,
Texas A&M University Digital Libraries
,
College Station, TX
, accessed Nov. 2022, http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/93197
18.
Li
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Bulk Flow Analysis of Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
2
), pp.
355
363
.10.1115/1.2817128
19.
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Lu
,
X.
,
2018
, “
Leakage, Drag Power and Rotordynamics Force Coefficients of an Air in Oil (Wet) Annular Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
140
(
1
), p.
012505
.10.1115/1.4037622
You do not currently have access to this content.