Abstract

This paper outlines the update of a turbomachinery course to cover three-dimensional (3D) aerodynamics using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes solver. Prior to the activities outlined in this paper, the course was taught in a conventional way with a series of lectures and a timed, written, open book examination in a formal exam setting. Students were equipped with a calculator and set of notes including correlations from Howell and Soderberg. The students had around 1 h to answer the turbomachinery question, which was revealed to them only when they opened the paper at the start of the exam. This limited the depth of any aerodynamic problem they could get through and so they were restricted to simple design or analysis exercises. The genesis of the course update was the release in 2017 of “MULTALL OPEN” (Denton, J. D., 2017, “Multall: An Open Source, Computational Fluid Dynamics Based, Turbomachinery Design System,” ASME J. Turbomach., 139(12), p. 121001), a freely available turbomachinery design system, and this was adopted as the course software—although other software choices were considered. Students now produce two turbomachinery designs during the course. These are both based on the J85 turbojet—largely to keep cycle calculations to a minimum but it was also important to ensure that students recognize that they were completing a real engineering task. The first task was a 3D aerodynamic design of multistage turbine, which includes compressible flow, tip clearance, and stacking techniques such as lean or sweep. The second task was a midspan (two-dimensional) compressor design. The exact cycle conditions were varied each year to explore design scenarios such as an increase in firing temperature. Assessment was by means of a short report where the best students report on their design choices, provide critical analysis of the design using appropriate postprocessing techniques, and compare their designs to the state of the art in the wider literature. As well as describing the successes and challenges of the update to 3D design methods the paper provides some guidance for educators thinking about adopting a similar approach.

References

1.
Horlock
,
J. H.
,
1960
, “
Losses and Efficiencies in Axial-Flow Turbines
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
2
(
1–2
), pp.
48
75
.10.1016/0020-7403(60)90013-8
2.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
2017
, “
Multall: An Open Source, Computational Fluid Dynamics Based, Turbomachinery Design System
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.,
139(12), p. 121001.10.1115/1.4037819
3.
Backman
,
J. L. H.
,
Turunen-Saaresti
,
T.
, and
Jaatinen
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Blended Education in Turbomachinery and Fluid Dynamics
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59799. 10.1115/GT2009-59799
4.
Grönman
,
A.
,
Backman
,
J.
,
Jaatinen-Värri
,
A.
, and
Grönman
,
K.
,
2016
, “
Experiences From Changing the Study Platform of Turbomachinery Course From Blended Education to Problem Based Learning
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56200. 10.1115/GT2016-56200
5.
Tomita
,
J. T.
,
Barbosa
,
J. R.
, and
Bringhenti
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Experiences on Project-Based-Classes for Turbomachine Design in an Aerospace Engineering Undergraduate Program
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-26393. 10.1115/GT2014-26393
6.
Rouser
,
K. P.
,
2017
, “
Oral Assessments of Student Learning in Undergraduate Aerospace Propulsion and Power Courses
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
139
(
12
), p.
124701
.10.1115/1.4037577
7.
Aus der Wiesche
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Course on Gas and Steam Turbines Supported by Cost-Efficient Turbomachinery Experiments
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2014-25076. 10.1115/GT2014-25076
8.
Byerley
,
A. R.
, and
Brandt
,
S. A.
,
2020
, “
Introducing Life Cycle Cost Analysis in an Undergraduate Gas Turbine Engine Design Capstone Course
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-15718. 10.1115/GT2020-15718
9.
Oliveira
,
I.
,
Silva
,
G. P.
,
Tonon
,
D.
,
Bringhenti
,
C.
, and
Takachi Tomita
,
J.
,
2020
, “
Interactive Learning Platform for Turbine Design Using Reduced Order Methods
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-16028. 10.1115/GT2020-16028
10.
Silva
,
G. P. D. O.
,
Tomita
,
J. T.
,
Bringhenti
,
C.
,
Whitacker
,
L. H. L.
, and
Tonon
,
D. D. S.
,
2022
, “
Interactive Learning Platform for the Preliminary Design of Axial Turbines and Its Use for Graduate Courses
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2022-82814. 10.1115/GT2022-82814
11.
Marn
,
A.
,
Schönleitner
,
F.
,
Peterleithner
,
J.
,
Woisetschläger
,
J.
, and
Heitmeir
,
F.
,
2016
, “
Introduction of a Project-Based-Course in Turbine Stage Design for Undergraduate Students at Graz University of Technology
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56071. 10.1115/GT2016-56071
12.
Van Treuren
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Involving Students in the Learning Process: Using Team Competition to Teach Gas Turbine Cycle Design
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2019-90535. 10.1115/GT2019-90535
13.
Aslanidou
,
I.
,
Zaccaria
,
V.
,
Pontika
,
E.
,
Zimmerman
,
N.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Kyprianidis
,
K. G.
,
2018
, “
Teaching Gas Turbine Technology to Undergraduate Students in Sweden
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2018-77074. 10.1115/GT2018-77074
14.
Pontika
,
E. C.
,
Kalfas
,
A. I.
, and
Aslanidou
,
I.
,
2019
, “
AeroEngineS: Multi-Platform Application for Aero Engine Simulation and Compressor Map Operating Point Prediction
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2019-91961. 10.1115/GT2019-91961
15.
Aslanidou
,
I.
,
Gaitanis
,
A.
, and
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
2020
, “
Introduction of a Smartphone Application in an Aeroengine Technology Course
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2020-15958. 10.1115/GT2020-15958
16.
Christensen
,
L.
, and
Mathison
,
R.
,
2021
, “
Educational Effectiveness of Brayton Cycle Compare and Solve Interactive Gas Turbine Simulator
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2021-59622. 10.1115/GT2021-59622
17.
Byerley
,
A. R.
,
Rouser
,
K. P.
, and
O'Dowd
,
D. O.
,
2017
, “
Exploring GasTurb 12 for Supplementary Use on an Introductory Propulsion Design Project
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-63465. 10.1115/GT2017-63465
18.
Gutzwiller
,
D. P.
,
Turner
,
M. G.
, and
Downing
,
M. J.
,
2009
, “
Educational Software for Blade and Disk Design
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59692. 10.1115/GT2009-59692
19.
Gutzwiller, D. P., Turner, M. G., and Downing, M. J., 2009, “
Bladed Disk Education Suite
,” accessed Dec. 9, 2023, http://gtsl.ase.uc.edu/T-AXI/BD%20Suite%20Website/index.html
20.
Tsinoglou
,
M. D.
,
Chala
,
D. S.
, and
Kalfas
,
A. I.
,
2022
, “
Pioneering Turbomachinery Education With Multi-Platform App for Blading Design
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2022-84535. 10.1115/GT2022-84535
21.
Whitacker
,
L. H. L.
,
Tomita
,
J. T.
, and
Bringhenti
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Project-Based Learning Applied in Turbopump Discipline at ITA Using 1D and 3D Numerical Simulations of a Booster Turbine Installed in the Space Shuttle Main Engine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2017-65058. 10.1115/GT2017-65058
22.
Childs
,
H.
,
Brugger
,
E.
,
Whitlock
,
B.
,
Meredith
,
J.
,
Ahern
,
S.
,
Pugmire
,
D.
,
Biagas
,
K.
, et al.,
2012
, “
VisIt: An End-User Tool for Visualizing and Analyzing Very Large Data
,” accessed Dec. 21, 2022, https://visit.llnl.gov
23.
Discover Uni
,
2023
, “
General Engineering at Durham University
,” accessed Feb. 20, 2023, https://discoveruni.gov.uk/course-details/10007143/H100/FullTime/
24.
Ingram
,
G.
,
2009
,
Basic Concepts in Turbomachinery
, 1st ed.,
Google-Books-ID
: GNqiiONAUpoC, Bookboon, London, UK.
25.
Dixon
,
S. L.
, and
Hall
,
C.
,
2013
,
Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
,
Google-Books-ID
: WZoTAAAAQBAJ, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
26.
Smith
,
S. F.
,
1965
, “
A Simple Correlation of Turbine Efficiency
,”
Aeronaut. J.
,
69
(
655
), pp.
467
470
.10.1017/S0001924000059108
27.
Babinsky
,
H.
,
2003
, “
How Do Wings Work?
,”
Phys. Educ.
,
38
(
6
), pp.
497
503
.10.1088/0031-9120/38/6/001
28.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME
Paper No. 93-GT-435. 10.1115/93-GT-435
29.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Xu
,
L.
,
1998
, “
The Exploitation of Three-Dimensional Flow in Turbomachinery Design
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C
,
213
(
2
), pp.
125
137
.10.1243/0954406991522220
You do not currently have access to this content.