Facility layout and flexible automation are two approaches for reduction of material handling costs and space requirements in a machining facility that have always been implemented independently of each other. This paper describes an integrated approach to compaction of existing machining facilities using machine grouping algorithms and multi-function machining centers, also referred to as Flexible Machining Modules (FMMs). First, we decompose a facility into a network of layout modules to reduce product travel distances and simplify material flow control. Then, subject to design feasibility, we identify those sets of machines in each module that could be replaced by multi-function FMMs that could be linked into a Flexible Machining System (FMS). The proposed approach uses a combination of pattern recognition and graph theory algorithms utilized for facility layout. The paper concludes with a description of a validation study conducted in an aerospace machining jobshop.

1.
Ito, Y., 1982, “Description of Machining Function in FMS and Its Analysis,” Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 503–509, MacMillan, London, UK.
2.
Powley
,
C.
,
1983
, “In Perspective: Flexible Manufacturing—The Facts,” Machinery and Production Engineering, October 5 pp. 22–28.
3.
Wick
,
C.
,
1987
, “Turning Centers Update,” Manuf. Eng., 41–48.
4.
Iwata
,
K.
,
1984
, “
FMS in Japan
,”
Bull. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
186
192
.
5.
Leonard
,
R.
,
1975
, “Economic Considerations of Machine Tool Selection,” Machinery and Production Engineering, March 5 pp.214–216.
6.
Winston, W. L., 1994, Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
7.
Andries
,
B.
, and
Gelders
,
L.
,
1995
, “
Time-based Manufacturing Logistics
,”
Logistics Information Management
,
8
(
6
), pp.
25
31
.
8.
Warnecke, H. J., and Steinhilper, R., 1983, “New International Developments for Flexible Automation in FMS,” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems, pp. 681–693, MacMillan, London, UK.
9.
Ito
,
Y.
, and
Shinno
,
H.
,
1982
, “
Structural Description and Similarity Evaluation of the Structural Configuration in Machine Tools
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res.
,
22
(
2
), pp.
97
110
.
10.
Ito
,
Y.
,
1984
, “
Description of Machine Tool and Its Applications—CAD System for Machine Tool Structures
,”
Bull. Jpn. Soc. Precis. Eng.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
178
185
.
11.
Harmon, R. L., and Peterson, L. D., 1990, Reinventing the Factory, The Free Press, New York, NY.
12.
Huang, H., and Irani, S. A., 1999, “Design of Facility Layouts Using Layout Modules: A Numerical Clustering Approach,” Proceedings of the 8th Industrial Engineering Research Conference (CD-ROM), D. Taylor, E. Malstrom, J. Watson, and K. Standley, eds., May 23–24, Phoenix, AZ.
13.
Irani
,
S. A.
, and
Huang
,
H.
,
2000
, “
Custom Design of Facility Layouts for Multi-product Facilities Using Layout Modules
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
16
(
3
), pp.
259
267
.
14.
Irani, S. A., and Huang, H., 1998, “Layout Modules: A Novel Extension of Hybrid Cellular Layouts,” Proceedings of the 1998 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, Paper No. 98-WA/MH-1, November 15–20, Anaheim, CA.
15.
Tam
,
K. Y.
,
1990
, “
An Operation Sequence Based Similarity Coefficient for Part Families Formations
,”
J. Manuf. Syst.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
55
68
.
16.
Sankoff, D., and Kruskal, J., 1983, Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
17.
Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W., 1982, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18.
Irani
,
S. A.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Zhou
,
J.
,
Huang
,
H.
,
Udai
,
T. K.
, and
Subramanian
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Production Flow Analysis and Simplification Toolkit (PFAST)
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
38
(
8
), pp.
1855
1874
.
You do not currently have access to this content.