Higher strength advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) such as DP780 and DP980 are more susceptible to fractures at bend radii during press stampings in comparison with more ductile low carbon sheet steels used by the automotive industry. Most research work to develop predictive guidelines for preventing failures at bend radii have centered on determining critical R/t ratios to avoid failures caused by bending. In this paper, results from bending tests with and without applied tension conducted on a number of AHSS steel lots to generate different conditions for fracture are presented. For bending tests with applied tension, measures of overall formability as a function of R/t ratio of the punch are presented. Consistent with other studies reported in literature, the overall formability was found to increase with increasing R/t ratio reaching saturation for higher R/t ratios. In addition, local formability was determined for all the bending tests by measuring the thickness strains at failure using an optical microscope. It was observed that the thickness strain at failure was dependent on the R/t ratio and the loading mode. Examination of fracture surfaces from the different tests using an SEM reveals that fracture initiation occurs primarily at the ferrite/martensite interphase boundary. To analyze the local loading conditions leading to fracture, 2D finite element analyses (FEA) of the different bending tests using ABAQUS standard were conducted. Results of the FEA were analyzed, and a parameter describing bending dominance in a stamping process was isolated. An empirical fracture criterion relating the thickness strain at fracture as a function of this parameter was developed. Implications of the generated results and their applications for part design and evaluation of stamping feasibility are also discussed.

References

1.
Keeler
,
S. P.
, and
Backofen
,
W. A.
, 1963, “
Plastic Instability and Fracture in Sheets Stretched Over Rigid Punches
,”
ASM Trans.
,
56
, pp.
25
48
.
2.
Hecker
,
S. S.
, 1975, “
Simple Technique for Determining Forming Limit Curves
,”
Sheet Metal Ind.
, pp.
671
676
.
3.
ISO/DIS 12004-2, Metallic Materials-Sheet and Strip: Determination of Forming Limit Curves—Part 2: Determination of Forming Limit Curves in the Laboratory, Draft procedures, 2006.
4.
Sriram
,
S.
,
Huang
,
G.
,
Yan
,
B.
, and
Geoffroy
,
J.-L.
, 2009, “
Comparison of Forming Limit Curves for Advanced High Strength Steels Using Different Techniques
,”
SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf.
2
(
1
), pp.
472
481
.
5.
Chu
,
C. C.
, 1983 “
On the Effect of Strain Path on the Formability of Sheet Metal
,”
Experimental Verification of Process Models
,
ASM, Metals Park
,
OH
, pp.
278
287
.
6.
Graf
,
A.
, and
Hosford
,
W. F.
, 1994, “
The Influence of Strain-Path Changes on Forming Limit Diagrams of Al 6111 T4
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
36
(
10
), pp.
897
910
.
7.
Stoughton
,
T. B.
, 2000. “
A General Forming Limit Criterion for Sheet Metal Forming
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
42
, pp.
1
27
.
8.
Walp
,
M. S.
,
Wurm
,
A.
,
Siekerk
,
J. F.
, and
Desai
,
A. K.
, 2006, “
Shear Fracture in Advanced High Strength Steels
,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1433.
9.
Zhang
,
Z. T.
, and
Hu
,
S. J.
, 1998. “
Stress and Residual Stress Distributions in Plane Strain Bending
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
40
(
6
), pp.
533
543
.
10.
Z.
Marciniak
, and
Duncan
,
J. L.
, 1992,
The Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming
,
Edward Arnold
,
London
.
11.
Hoffman
,
O.
, and
Sachs
,
G.
, 1953,
Theory of Plasticity
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
12.
Datsko
,
J.
, and
Yang
,
C. T.
, 1960, “
Correlation of Bendability of Materials With Their Tensile Properties
,”
ASME Trans. B
,
82
, pp.
309
314
.
13.
Sriram
,
S.
,
Wong
,
C.
,
Huang
,
M.
,
Yan
,
B.
, and
Urban
,
D.
, 2003, “
Formability Characterization of a New Generation of High Strength Steels
,” AISI/DOE Technology Roadmap Project No. TRP0012.
14.
Demeri
,
M. Y.
, 1981, “
The Stretch-Bend Forming of Sheet Metal
,”
J. Appl. Metalworking
,
2
(
1
), pp.
3
10
.
15.
Sriram
,
S.
,
Wong
,
C.
,
Yan
,
B.
, and
Huang
,
M.
, 2003, “
Stretch Bendability of Advanced High Strength Steels
,”
SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf.
,
112
, pp.
641
649
.
16.
Kim
,
H.
,
Bandar
,
A. R.
,
Yang
,
Y.-P.
,
Sung
,
J. H.
, and
Wagoner
,
R. H.
, 2009, “
Failure Analysis of Advanced High Strength Steels During Draw Bending
,”
IDDRG 2009
,
Golden, CO.
17.
Hudgins
,
A. W.
,
Matlock
,
D. K.
, and
Speer
,
J. G.
, 2009, “
Shear Failures in Bending of Advanced High Strength Steels
,”
IDDRG 2009
,
Golden, CO.
18.
Huang
,
M.
,
Zhang
L.
, and
Yang
,
L.
, 2008, “
On the Failure of AHSS at Tooling Radius
,”
NUMISHEET 2008
,
Interlaken
,
Switzerland
.
19.
Damborg
,
F. F.
,
Wagoner
,
R. H.
,
Nielsen
,
K. B.
, and
Danckert
,
J.
, 1998, “
Application of Ductile Fracture Criteria to Bending Under Tension
,” IDDRG 1998, Belgium.
20.
ABAQUS®, Dassault Systèmes, 2010.
21.
Keeler
,
S. P.
, and
Brazier
,
W. G.
, 1975, “
Relationship Between Laboratory Material Characterization and Press Shop Formability
,” Microalloying 75, October 1975, Washington.
22.
Riffle
,
W. J.
, Circle Grids and FLD Diagrams, 1995, “
Latest Advances in Sheet Metal Forming Technology Seminar
,” University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Continuing Engineering Education, May.
You do not currently have access to this content.