In recent years, the requirements for high dimensional precision on Z-bent shaped parts have become increasingly stringent. To attain these requirements, the suitable selection of the Z-die bending type has to be considered much more strictly. In this research, two types of Z-bending processes, offset Z-die bending and wiping Z-die bending, were investigated using the finite element method (FEM) to identify the spring-back characteristics and dimensions of Z-bent shaped parts. In the case of offset Z-die bending, the spring-back characteristics on both bend angles were similar. In contrast, in the case of wiping Z-bending, the spring-back characteristics on both bend angles were different. In addition, the dimensions of the Z-bent shaped parts were investigated. It was found, in the case of wiping Z-bending, that web thinning was generated and the outer bend radius was out of tolerance. To validate the FEM simulation results, experiments were carried out. The FEM simulation results showed good agreement with the experimental results in terms of the bend angles and the overall geometry of the Z-bent shaped parts. To achieve precise Z-bent shaped parts, the suitable selection of Z-die bending type in the Z-die bending process is very important.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 2018
Research-Article
Comparison of Offset and Wiping Z-Die Designs for Precision Z-Bent Part Fabrication
Sutasn Thipprakmas,
Sutasn Thipprakmas
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
e-mail: sutasn.thi@kmutt.ac.th
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
e-mail: sutasn.thi@kmutt.ac.th
Search for other works by this author on:
Pakkawat Komolruji,
Pakkawat Komolruji
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod
, Thungkhru,Bangkok 10140, Thailand
Search for other works by this author on:
Wiriyakorn Phanitwong
Wiriyakorn Phanitwong
Department of Tool and
Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand;
Department of Industrial Engineering,
Rajamangala University of
Technology Rattanakosin,
96 Mu 3 Phutthamonthon Sai 5 Road,
Salaya, Phutthamonthon,
Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
e-mail: wiriyakorn.wp@gmail.com
Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand;
Department of Industrial Engineering,
Rajamangala University of
Technology Rattanakosin,
96 Mu 3 Phutthamonthon Sai 5 Road,
Salaya, Phutthamonthon,
Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
e-mail: wiriyakorn.wp@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Sutasn Thipprakmas
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
e-mail: sutasn.thi@kmutt.ac.th
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
e-mail: sutasn.thi@kmutt.ac.th
Pakkawat Komolruji
Department of Tool and Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod
, Thungkhru,Bangkok 10140, Thailand
Wiriyakorn Phanitwong
Department of Tool and
Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand;
Department of Industrial Engineering,
Rajamangala University of
Technology Rattanakosin,
96 Mu 3 Phutthamonthon Sai 5 Road,
Salaya, Phutthamonthon,
Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
e-mail: wiriyakorn.wp@gmail.com
Materials Engineering,
King Mongkut's University of
Technology Thonburi,
126 Bangmod, Thungkhru,
Bangkok 10140, Thailand;
Department of Industrial Engineering,
Rajamangala University of
Technology Rattanakosin,
96 Mu 3 Phutthamonthon Sai 5 Road,
Salaya, Phutthamonthon,
Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
e-mail: wiriyakorn.wp@gmail.com
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received March 22, 2017; final manuscript received December 11, 2017; published online January 3, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Christopher Tyler.
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Feb 2018, 140(2): 021015 (9 pages)
Published Online: January 3, 2018
Article history
Received:
March 22, 2017
Revised:
December 11, 2017
Citation
Thipprakmas, S., Komolruji, P., and Phanitwong, W. (January 3, 2018). "Comparison of Offset and Wiping Z-Die Designs for Precision Z-Bent Part Fabrication." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. February 2018; 140(2): 021015. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038727
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
A Desirability-Based Solution Search Method for Sequential Optimization of the Hot Rolling Process
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (October,2023)
Decomposition-Based Assembly Synthesis of Space Frame Structures Using Joint Library
J. Mech. Des (January,2006)
Package-to-Board Attach Reliability — Methodology and Case Study on OMPAC Package
J. Electron. Packag (September,1998)
A Finite-Element and Experimental Analysis of Stress Distribution in Various Shear Tests for Solder Joints
J. Electron. Packag (March,1998)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Stress Concentration Factors in Multiple Row Joints
Structural Shear Joints: Analyses, Properties and Design for Repeat Loading
Producibility Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering: Principles for Optimization, Third Edition
An Adaptive Fuzzy Control for a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom System
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17