Whether the next generation of submarines can operate more deeply depends on the feasibility of developing pressure hull structures sufficiently strong to resist intense external pressure, but also sufficiently light that adequate excess of buoyancy remains over hull weight to accommodate propulsion plant, personnel, and “payload.” By extrapolation of principles of design now employed for shallower running boats, calculations were made of the strength-weight characteristics of structure in the depth range of 2,000 to 20,000 feet. Results indicate that, by utilizing materials such as aluminum alloy 7079-T6, titanium, fiberglas-reinforced-plastic, and superstrength steels, submarine hulls appear feasible for successful operation to depths of one, two, and even three miles, without trade-off sacrifices in speed or combat potency. The yield strength-density ratio of a material serves as its index of efficiency, but cost and ease of fabrication must also be considered in design. Significant problems remain in construction technology that could be mitigated by use of sheathed assemblies wherein nonweldable materials can be effectively employed as hull constituents.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 1962
This article was originally published in
Journal of Engineering for Industry
Research Papers
Feasibility of Pressure Hulls for Ultradeep Running Submarines
Edward Wenk, Jr.
Edward Wenk, Jr.
Office of Special Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, The White House, Washington, D. C.
Search for other works by this author on:
Edward Wenk, Jr.
Office of Special Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, The White House, Washington, D. C.
J. Eng. Ind. Aug 1962, 84(3): 373-391
Published Online: August 1, 1962
Article history
Received:
August 3, 1961
Online:
December 9, 2011
Article
Article discussed|
View article
Connected Content
Citation
Wenk, E., Jr. (August 1, 1962). "Feasibility of Pressure Hulls for Ultradeep Running Submarines." ASME. J. Eng. Ind. August 1962; 84(3): 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3667519
Download citation file:
27
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Combined Experimental/Numerical Development of Propulsor Evaluation Capability
J. Fluids Eng (August,2011)
Vibration Analysis of Submerged Submarine Pressure Hull
J. Vib. Acoust (February,2011)
Design of a Multijet Omnidirectional Propulsion System for Small Jet-Boats
J. Mech. Des (November,2010)
A Method of Sizing Multi-Cycle Engines for Hypersonic Aircraft
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,1990)
Related Chapters
Part 2, Section II—Materials and Specifications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Second Edition
Part 2, Section II—Materials and Specifications
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition
Reassessment
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine