This paper demonstrates the automatic design synthesis of continuum structures by the process of topology/shape optimization. The problem is solved as a discrete optimization problem using the genetic algorithm (GA). Past efforts using this approach have not been very effective due to the lack of an appropriate structural geometric representation which is highly essential to the success of the evolutionary processes of the GA. Based on the morphology of living creatures, a representation scheme has been developed using arrangements of skeleton and ‘flesh’ to define structural geometry. This scheme facilitates the transmission of topological and shape characteristics across generations in the evolutionary process, and will not render any structurally invalid designs. Good results are illustrated using this scheme to design a compliant mechanism and a cantilever beam. [S1050-0472(00)02104-8]
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Bendsoe
, M. P.
, and Kikuchi
, N.
, 1988
, “Generating Optimal Topologies in Structural Design Using a Homogenization Method
,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
, 71
, pp. 197
–224
.2.
Yang
, R. J.
, and Chuang
, C. H.
, 1994
, “Optimal Topology Design Using Linear Programming
,” Comput. Struct.
, 52
, pp. 265
–275
.3.
Atrek, E., 1989, “SHAPE: A Program for Shape Optimization of Continuum Structures,” Computer Aided Optimum Design of Structures: Applications, C. A. Brebbia and S. Hernandez, eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, pp. 135–144.
4.
Russell, D. M., and Manoochehri, S. P., 1989, “A Two Dimensional Rule-Based Shape Synthesis Method,” Advances in Design Automation—1989—Vol. 2 Design Optimization, Ravani, B., ed., New York, pp. 217–223.
5.
Xie
, Y. M.
, and Steven
, G. P.
, 1993
, “A Simple Evolutionary Procedure for Structural Optimization
,” Comput. Struct.
, 49
, pp. 885
–896
.6.
Eschenauer
, H. A.
, Kobelev
, V. V.
, and Schumacher
, A.
, 1994
, “Bubble Method for Topology and Shape Optimization of Structures
,” Struct. Opt.
, 8
, pp. 42
–51
.7.
Tai
, K.
, and Fenner
, R. T.
, 1999
, “Optimum Shape and Topology Design Using the Boundary Element Method
,” Int. J. Solids Struct.
, 36
, pp. 2021
–2040
.8.
Kumar
, A. V.
, and Gossard
, D. C.
, 1996
, “Synthesis of Optimal Shape and Topology of Structures
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 118
, pp. 68
–74
.9.
Chapman
, C. D.
, Saitou
, K.
, and Jakiela
, M. J.
, 1994
, “Genetic Algorithms as an Approach to Configuration and Topology Design
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 116
, pp. 1005
–1012
.10.
Chapman
, C. D.
, and Jakiela
, M. J.
, 1996
, “Genetic Algorithm-Based Structural Topology Design with Compliance and Topology Simplification Considerations
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 118
, pp. 89
–98
.11.
Tai, K., and Chee, T. H., 1998, “Genetic Algorithm With Structural Morphology Representation for Topology Design Optimization,” Mechanics in Design, Gentle, C. R., and Hull, J. B., eds., Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, pp. 827–836.
12.
Mortenson, M. E., 1997, Geometric Modeling, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
13.
Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
14.
Michalewicz, Z., 1994, Genetic Algorithms+Data Structures=Evolution Programs, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15.
Schoenauer, M., 1995, “Shape Representations for Evolutionary Optimization and Identification in Structural Mechanics,” Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science, Winter, G., Periaux, J., Galan, M., and Cuesta, P., eds., Wiley, Chichester, pp. 443–464.
16.
Her
, I.
, and Midha
, A.
, 1987
, “A Compliance Number Concept for Compliant Mechanisms, and Type Synthesis
,” ASME J. Mech., Transm., Autom. Des.
, 109
, pp. 348
–355
.17.
Howell
, L. L.
, and Midha
, A.
, 1995
, “Parametric Deflection Approximations for End-Loaded, Large-Deflection Beams in Compliant Mechanisms
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 117
, pp. 156
–165
.18.
Ananthasuresh, G. K., Kota, S., and Kikuchi, N., 1994, “Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant MEMS,” Dynamic Systems and Control (Vol. 2 of 2) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC. Vol. 55–2, Radcliffe, C. J., eds., New York, pp. 677–686.
19.
Frecker
, M. I.
, Ananthasuresh
, G. K.
, Nishiwaki
, S.
, Kikuchi
, N.
, and Kota
, S.
, 1997
, “Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Criteria Optimization
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 119
, pp. 238
–245
.20.
Sigmund
, O.
, 1997
, “On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization
,” Mechanics of Structures and Machines
, 25
, pp. 493
–524
.21.
Larsen
, U. D.
, Sigmund
, O.
, and Bouwstra
, S.
, 1997
, “Design and Fabrication of Compliant Micromechanisms and Structures with Negative Poisson’s Ratio
,” J. Microelectromech. Syst.
, 6
, pp. 99
–106
.22.
Suzuki
, K.
, and Kikuchi
, N.
, 1991
, “A Homogenization Method for Shape and Topology Optimization
,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
, 93
, pp. 291
–318
.23.
Jog
, C. S.
, Haber
, R. B.
, and Bendsoe
, M. P.
, 1994
, “Topology Design With Optimized, Self-Adaptive Materials
,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
, 37
, pp. 1323
–1350
.24.
Kane, C., Jouve, F., and Schoenauer, M., 1995, “Structural Topology Optimization in Linear and Nonlinear Elasticity Using Genetic Algorithms,” Proceedings of the 1995 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Vol. 1 Advances in Design Automation, Azarm, S., Dutta, D., Eschenauer, H., Gilmore, B., McCarthy, M., and Yoshimura, M., eds., New York, pp. 385–392.
25.
Michalewicz
, Z.
, and Schoenauer
, M.
, 1996
, “Evolutionary Algorithms for Constrained Parameter Optimization Problems
,” Evolut. Comput.
, 4
, pp. 1
–32
.Copyright © 2000
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
