Laid down in this paper are the foundations on which the design of engineering systems, in the presence of an uncontrollable changing environment, can be based. The changes in environment conditions are accounted for by means of robustness. To this end, a theoretical framework as well as a general methodology for model-based robust design are proposed. Within this framework, all quantities involved in a design task are classified into three sets: the design variables (DV), grouped in vector x, which are to be assigned values as an outcome of the design task; the design-environment parameters (DEP), grouped in vector p, over which the designer has no control; and the performance functions (PF), grouped in vector f, representing the functional relations among performance, DV, and DEP. A distinction is made between global robust design and local robust design, this paper focusing on the latter. The robust design problem is formulated as the minimization of a norm of the covariance matrix of the variations in PF upon variations in the DEP, aka noise in the literature on robust design. Moreover, one pertinent concept is introduced: design isotropy. We show that isotropic designs lead to robustness, even in the absence of knowledge of the statistical properties of the variations of the DEP. To demonstrate our approach, a few examples are included.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
design engineering, product design, covariance matrices, stability
Topics:
Design
1.
Taguchi, G., 1987, System of Experimental Design, Vols. I & II, UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications, New York, and American Supplier Institute, Dearborn, MI.
2.
Wu, Y., and Wu, A., 2000, Taguchi Methods for Robust Design, ASME, New York.
3.
Taguchi
,
G.
,
1988
, “
The Development of Quality Engineering
,”
ASI
,
1
(
1
), pp.
5
–
29
.
4.
Box
,
G.
,
1988
, “
Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations
,”
Technometrics
,
30
(
1
), pp.
1
–
17
.
5.
Otto
,
K.
, and
Antonsson
,
E.
,
1993
, “
Extensions to Taguchi Method of Product Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
(
1
), pp.
5
–
13
.
6.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
(
1
), pp.
74
–
80
.
7.
Chen
,
W.
,
Allen
,
J.
,
Tsui
,
K.
, and
Mistree
,
F.
,
1996
, “
A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
(
4
), pp.
478
–
485
.
8.
Gadallah, M., and El-Maraghy, H., 1999, “A Statistical Optimization Approach to Robust Design,” Simultaneous Engineering: Methodologies and Applications, R. Utpal, J. Usher, and J. Hamid, Gordan and Science Publishers, Singapore, pp. 135–158.
9.
McAllister
,
C.
, and
Simpson
,
T.
,
2003
, “
Multidisciplinary Robust Design Optimization of an Internal Combustion Engine
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
124
–
130
.
10.
Kalsi
,
M.
,
Hacker
,
K.
, and
Lewis
,
K.
,
2001
, “
A Comprehensive Robust Design Approach for Decision Trade-offs in Complex Systems Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
1
), pp.
1
–
10
.
11.
Hernandez
,
G.
,
Allen
,
J.
,
Woodruff
,
G.
,
Simpson
,
T.
,
Bascaran
,
E.
,
Avila
,
L.
, and
Salinas
,
F.
,
2001
, “
Robust Design of Families of Products with Production Modeling and Evaluation
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
2
), pp.
183
–
190
.
12.
Angeles, J., 2002, “The Robust Design of Mechanical Elements and Systems,” Proc. CSME Forum, the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering, London, ON (on CD).
13.
Al-Widyan, K., Cervantes-Sa´nchez, J., and Angeles, J., 2002, “The Robust Synthesis of Planar Four-Bar Linkages for Motion Generation,” Proc. of ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME Paper No. DETC2002/MECH–34270.
14.
Hu
,
S.
,
Webbink
,
R.
,
Lee
,
J.
, and
Long
,
Y.
,
2003
, “
Robustness Evaluation for Compliant Assembly Systems
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
125
(
2
), pp.
262
–
267
.
15.
Zhu
,
J.
, and
Ting
,
K.
,
2001
, “
Performance Distribution Analysis and Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
123
(
1
), pp.
11
–
17
.
16.
Parkinson
,
D.
,
2000
, “
The Application of a Robust Design Method to Tolerances
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
2
), pp.
149
–
154
.
17.
Yu
,
J.
, and
Ishii
,
K.
,
1998
, “
Design for Robustness Based on Manufacturing Variation Patterns
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
120
(
2
), pp.
196
–
201
.
18.
Du
,
X.
, and
Chen
,
W.
,
2000
, “
Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
385
–
394
.
19.
Hirokawa, N., and Fujita, K., 2002, “Mini-Max Type Formulation of Strict Robust Design Optimization Under Correlative Variation,” Proc. of ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME Paper No. DETC2002/DAC-34041.
20.
Teng, C., and Angeles, J., 2005, “Optimality Criterion for the Structural Optimization of Machine Elements,” ASME J. Mech. Des., (accepted).
21.
Cramer, C., 1946, Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
22.
Zhang, F., 1999, Matrix Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.
23.
Golub, G. H., and Van Loan, C., 1994, Matrix Computations, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
24.
Shigley, J., and Mischke, C., 1989, Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
25.
Bolton, W., 1997, Pneumatic and Hydraulic Systems, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
26.
Wilde
,
D. J.
,
1992
, “
Monotonicity Analysis of Taguchi’s Robust Circuit Design Problem
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
114
(
4
), pp.
616
–
619
.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.