Plastic components are vital components of many engineered products, frequently representing 20–40% of the product value. While injection molding is the most common process for economically producing complex designs in large quantities, a large initial monetary investment and extended development time are required to develop appropriate tooling. For applications with lower or unknown production quantities, designers may prefer another process that has a lower development cost and lead time albeit with higher marginal costs and production times. A methodology is presented that assists the designer to select the most appropriate manufacturing process that trades off the total production costs with production lead times. The approach is to develop aggregate component cost and lead-time models as a function of production quantity from extensive industry data for an electrical enclosure consisting of two components. Binding quotes were secured from multiple suppliers for a variety of manufacturing processes including computer numerical control machining, fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering, vacuum casting, direct fabrication, and injection molding with soft prototype and production tooling. The methodology yields a Pareto optimal set that compares the production costs and lead times as a function of the production quantity. The results indicate that the average cost per enclosure assembly is highly sensitive to the production quantity, with average costs varying by more than a factor of 100 for production quantities varying between 100 and 10,000 assemblies. Each of the processes is competitive with respect to total production cost and total production lead time under differing conditions; a flow chart is provided as an example of a decision support tool that can be provided to assist process selection during the product development process and thereby reduce the product development time and cost.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: daviḏkazmer@uml.edu
Article navigation
December 2007
Research Papers
Low Volume Plastics Manufacturing Strategies
Ruchi Karania,
Ruchi Karania
Department of Plastics Engineering,
University of Massachusetts Lowell
, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854
Search for other works by this author on:
David Kazmer
David Kazmer
Department of Plastics Engineering,
e-mail: daviḏkazmer@uml.edu
University of Massachusetts Lowell
, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854
Search for other works by this author on:
Ruchi Karania
Department of Plastics Engineering,
University of Massachusetts Lowell
, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854
David Kazmer
Department of Plastics Engineering,
University of Massachusetts Lowell
, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA 01854e-mail: daviḏkazmer@uml.edu
J. Mech. Des. Dec 2007, 129(12): 1225-1233 (9 pages)
Published Online: January 31, 2007
Article history
Received:
May 27, 2005
Revised:
January 31, 2007
Citation
Karania, R., and Kazmer, D. (January 31, 2007). "Low Volume Plastics Manufacturing Strategies." ASME. J. Mech. Des. December 2007; 129(12): 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2790978
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Geometric Tailoring: A Design for Manufacturing Method for Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling
J. Mech. Des (July,2004)
Design Development of Unitized Titanium Structure
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2003)
Editorial
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (December,2007)
RP Industry’s Growing Pains
Mechanical Engineering (July,1998)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Optimum Thin Walled Injection Molding Parameters Design, Based on Taguchi Technique for Mobile
International Conference on Computer and Computer Intelligence (ICCCI 2011)
Computer Aided Design of Tools, Dies, and Moulds (TDMs)
Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing
Digital Human in Engineering and Bioengineering Applications
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1