Graphical Abstract Figure

Schematic used to define anatomical measurements of the tibial tubercle.

Graphical Abstract Figure

Schematic used to define anatomical measurements of the tibial tubercle.

Close modal

Abstract

Data regarding the tibial tubercle anatomy, as it relates to the execution and fixation of a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in the revision total joint arthroplasty setting, is limited in current scientific literature. This paper aims to define pertinent anatomical relationships in the proximal tibia to inform fixation device design and provide data that may be considered when performing and securing a tibial tubercle osteotomy. We defined eight radiographic dimensions based on seven anatomical landmarks and two lines. These dimensions were measured on 200 retrospectively selected anterior-to-posterior (AP) and lateral knee radiographs with a total knee arthroplasty tibial component present. Measurements were tabulated descriptively and analyzed according to age, sex, and race. The narrowest range of measurements was for tibial tuberosity height at 2.7–13.8 mm and the widest range was for tibial tuberosity length at 47.0–122.7 mm. Sex was the only demographic variable to show statistical significance (p < 0.05) between measurements. Only one measurement, tibial tuberosity origin distance, showed no statistically significant difference between sexes. There were no statistically significant differences in mean values across age groups or races. This paper presents data on anatomical dimensions of the tibial tubercle. The data analyzed in the study underscores the substantial variability of anatomy that may be encountered when performing and securing a tibial tubercle osteotomy during revision total knee arthroplasty. The data also demonstrates that the current recommendation for length of TTO is potentially insufficient to include the necessary portion of the tubercle.

References

1.
Qazi
,
A. R.
,
Iqbal
,
F.
,
Noor
,
S. S.
,
Ahmed
,
N.
,
Uddin
,
A. A.
,
Memon
,
N.
, and
Memon
,
N.
,
2021
, “
Impact of Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy on Final Outcome in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Our Experience and Technique in Pakistan
,”
Clin. Orthop. Surg.
,
13
(
1
), pp.
53
59
.10.4055/cios20057
2.
Chalidis
,
B. E.
, and
Ries
,
M. D.
,
2009
, “
Does Repeat Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy or Intramedullary Extension Affect the Union Rate in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Retrospective Study of 74 Patients
,”
Acta Orthop.
,
80
(
4
), pp.
426
–4
31
.10.3109/17453670903110683
3.
DeHaan
,
A.
,
Shukla
,
S.
,
Anderson
,
M.
, and
Ries
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy to Aid Exposure for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
,”
JBJS Essent. Surg. Tech.
,
6
(
3
), p.
e32
.10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00023
4.
Kurtz
,
S.
,
Ong
,
K.
,
Lau
,
E.
,
Mowat
,
F.
, and
Halpern
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2005 to 2030
,”
Jbjs
,
89
(
4
), pp.
780
785
.10.2106/00004623-200704000-00012
5.
Divano
,
S.
,
Camera
,
A.
,
Biggi
,
S.
,
Tornago
,
S.
,
Formica
,
M.
, and
Felli
,
L.
,
2018
, “
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy (TTO) in Total Knee Arthroplasty, Is It Worth It? A Review of the Literature
,”
Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.
,
138
(
3
), pp.
387
399
.10.1007/s00402-018-2888-y
6.
Whiteside
,
L. A.
,
1995
, “
Exposure in Difficult Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
,
321
, pp.
32
35
.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7497683/
7.
Trickett
,
R. W.
,
Hodgson
,
P.
,
Forster
,
M. C.
, and
Robertson
,
A.
,
2009
, “
The Reliability and Accuracy of Digital Templating in Total Knee Replacement
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol.
,
91-B
(
7
), pp.
903
906
.10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21476
8.
Upfill-Brown
,
A.
,
Hsiue
,
P. P.
,
Sekimura
,
T.
,
Shi
,
B.
,
Ahlquist
,
S. A.
,
Patel
,
J. N.
,
Adamson
,
M.
, and
Stavrakis
,
A. I.
,
2022
, “
Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019
,”
Arthroplasty Today
,
15
, pp.
188
195.
10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004
9.
Di Benedetto
,
P.
,
Buttironi
,
M.
,
Giardini
,
P.
,
Mancuso
,
F.
,
Cainero
,
V.
, and
Causero
,
A.
,
2020
, “
Total Knee Revision Arthroplasty: Comparison Between Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy and Quadriceps Snip Approach. Complication Rate
,”
Acta Bio Med. Atenei Parmensis
,
91
(
4-S
), pp.
146
151
.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32555089/
10.
Kitridis
,
D.
,
Givissis
,
P.
, and
Chalidis
,
B.
,
2020
, “
Timing of Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy in Two-Stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Affect Union and Reinfection Rate. A Systematic Review
,”
Knee
,
27
(
6
), pp.
1787
1794
.10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.008
11.
Yoshioka
,
Y.
,
Siu
,
D. W.
,
Scudamore
,
R. A.
, and
Cooke
,
T. D.
,
1989
, “
Tibial Anatomy and Functional Axes
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
,
7
(
1
), pp.
132
137
.10.1002/jor.1100070118
12.
Nakamura
,
S.
,
Morita
,
Y.
,
Ito
,
H.
,
Kuriyama
,
S.
,
Furu
,
M.
, and
Matsuda
,
S.
,
2015
, “
Morphology of the Proximal Tibia at Different Levels of Bone Resection in Japanese Knees
,”
J. Arthroplasty
,
30
(
12
), pp.
2323
2327
.10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.056
13.
Kwak
,
D. S.
,
Surendran
,
S.
,
Pengatteeri
,
Y. H.
,
Park
,
S. E.
,
Choi
,
K. N.
,
Gopinathan
,
P.
,
Han
,
S. H.
, and
Han
,
C. W.
,
2007
, “
Morphometry of the Proximal Tibia to Design the Tibial Component of Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Korean Population
,”
Knee
,
14
(
4
), pp.
295
300
.10.1016/j.knee.2007.05.004
14.
van den Broek
,
C. M.
,
van Hellemondt
,
G. G.
,
Jacobs
,
W. C.
, and
Wymenga
,
A. B.
,
2006
, “
Step-Cut Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy for Access in Revision Total Knee Replacement
,”
Knee
,
13
(
6
), pp.
430
434
.10.1016/j.knee.2006.07.003
15.
Oikawa
,
R.
,
Tajima
,
G.
,
Yan
,
J.
,
Maruyama
,
M.
,
Sugawara
,
A.
,
Oikawa
,
S.
,
Saigo
,
T.
,
Takahashi
,
H.
, and
Doita
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Morphology of the Patellar Tendon and Its Insertion Sites Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography: A Cadaveric Study
,”
Knee
,
26
(
2
), pp.
302
309
.10.1016/j.knee.2018.12.002
16.
Zonnenberg
,
C. B.
,
van den Bekerom
,
M. P.
,
de Jong
,
T.
, and
Nolte
,
P. A.
,
2014
, “
Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy With Absorbable Suture Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of 23 Cases
,”
Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.
,
134
(
5
), pp.
667
672
.10.1007/s00402-014-1950-7
You do not currently have access to this content.