The newly constructed Tacoma Narrows Bridge Piers represent large concrete floating caissons during their construction. For designing their mooring system the current force applied on the caissons in the Narrows must be known. The flow field around the caisson is highly complex and the calculation of the current load on the caisson by analytical means is difficult. On the other hand, model tests suffer from the distortion in the Reynolds number. Therefore, a two-prong approach was undertaken. Besides the fixed model test of the caissons for current forces, a CFD analysis of the flow around the caisson is chosen. A three-dimensional CFD approach is considered more appropriate than a two-dimensional one, since the bottom contour at the site is irregular and water depth is rather shallow. This paper discusses the CFD method and the results obtained from such analysis. The numerical analysis was carried out in both ebb and flood flow of the tidal current in the basin. One of the difficulties of the computational method is the very high Reynolds number encountered by the large current and large size of the caisson. The analysis is performed in both model and full scales so that the difference in the results may be investigated. Also, since the model test data are available, comparisons are made between the CFD and model test results on the drag and lift forces on the caisson.

1.
Williamson
,
C. H. K.
, 1996, “
Vortex Dynamics in a Cylinder Wake
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
28
, pp.
477
539
.
2.
Lu
,
X.
,
Dalton
,
C.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
, 1997, “
Application of Large Eddy Simulation Flow Past a Circular Cylinder
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
0892-7219,
119
, pp.
219
225
.
3.
Meling
,
T. R.
, 1998, “
Numerical Prediction of the Response of a Vortex-Excited Cylinder at High Reynolds Numbers
,”
Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, OMAE Paper No. 98-0315, Lisbon, Portugal
.
4.
Spalart
,
P. R.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
, 1992, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamics Flows
,”
AIAA Pap.
0146-3705 No. 92-0439, Reno, NV.
5.
Moe
,
G.
,
Holden
,
K.
, and
Yttervoli
,
P. O.
, 1994, “
Motion of Spring-supported Cylinders in Subcritical and Critical Water Flows
,”
Proc. of the 4th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, ASME
, pp.
468
475
.
6.
Schultz
,
K.
, and
Kallinderis
,
Y. O.
, 1998, “
Numerical Prediction of Vortex-Induced Vibrations
,”
Proc. of the 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, ASME, OMAE Paper No.98-0362, Lisbon, Portugal
.
7.
Spalart
,
P. R.
Jou
,
W. H.
,
Strelets
,
M.
, and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
, 1997, “
Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on Hybrid RANS/LES Approach
,”
1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Columbus OH, Advances in DNS/LES
, Aug. 4–8, 1997, Greyden.
8.
Smagorinsky
,
J.
, 1963, “
General Circulation Experiments with the Primitive Equations; I, Basic Experiments
,”
Mon. Weather Rev.
0027-0644,
91
, pp.
99
164
.
9.
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
, 1987, “
Recent Progress in the Development and Understanding of SUPG Methods with Special Reference to the Compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
0271-2091,
1987
, pp.
1261
1275
.
10.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Hulbert
,
G. M.
, 1993, “
A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics with Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized Method
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
0021-8936,
60
, pp.
371
375
.
11.
Delany
,
N. K.
, and
Sorenson
,
N. E.
, 1953, “
Low-Speed Drag of Cylinders of Various Shapes
,” NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics), Ames Aeronautical Laboratory, Moffett Field, CA.
12.
Debus
,
K.
,
Berkoe
,
J.
,
Rosendall
,
B.
, and
Shakib
,
F.
, 2003, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Tacoma Narrows Bridge Upgrade Project
,”
4th ASME/JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, FEDSM2003-45514, Honolulu, Hawaii, July, 2003
.
You do not currently have access to this content.