As oil and gas companies in the Arctic attempt to maximize the value of each project and optimize their portfolio of investment opportunities, it has become vital to evaluate drilling waste handling practices for their cost-effectiveness in order to support strategic decisions. Identifying cost-effective waste handling practices, which have a minimal environmental footprint, however, is one of the biggest challenges for Arctic offshore industries. The cost and potential risks of drilling waste handling practices in the Arctic offshore operation will differ vastly, depending on the operating environment such as the ice conditions and negative sea temperature. However, in the majority of the available cost-effectiveness and risk analysis literature, the influence of the operating environment on the cost and risk profile has received less attention. Hence, the aim of this paper is to propose a methodology for risk-based cost-effectiveness analysis (RB–CEA) of drilling waste handling practices by considering the complex and fast-changing nature of the Arctic. The central thrust of this paper is to highlight the fact that comparing different alternatives based on the cost elements alone is misleading. The proposed methodology uses risk assessment as a key component for the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). The application of the proposed methodology is demonstrated by a case study of the drilling waste handling practices of an oil field in the Barents Sea. The case study results demonstrate that the operating environment causes costs to be between 1.18 and 1.52 times greater, depending on the type of practices and operating season, in the Arctic offshore compared with the North Sea. Further, the risk of undesirable events is between 1.48 and 2.60 times greater during waste handling activities under Arctic operational conditions.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2016
Research-Article
Risk-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Waste Handling Practices in the Arctic Drilling Operation
Y. Z. Ayele,
Y. Z. Ayele
Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: yonas.z.ayele@uit.no
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: yonas.z.ayele@uit.no
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Barabadi,
A. Barabadi
Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: abbas.b.abadi@uit.no
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: abbas.b.abadi@uit.no
Search for other works by this author on:
E. L. Droguett
E. L. Droguett
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Chile,
Santiago 8370448, Chile
e-mail: elopezdroguett@ing.uchile.cl
University of Chile,
Santiago 8370448, Chile
e-mail: elopezdroguett@ing.uchile.cl
Search for other works by this author on:
Y. Z. Ayele
Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: yonas.z.ayele@uit.no
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: yonas.z.ayele@uit.no
A. Barabadi
Department of Engineering and Safety,
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: abbas.b.abadi@uit.no
UiT The Arctic University of Norway,
Tromsø 9037, Norway
e-mail: abbas.b.abadi@uit.no
E. L. Droguett
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Chile,
Santiago 8370448, Chile
e-mail: elopezdroguett@ing.uchile.cl
University of Chile,
Santiago 8370448, Chile
e-mail: elopezdroguett@ing.uchile.cl
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 18, 2015; final manuscript received January 22, 2016; published online April 1, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Søren Ehlers.
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Jun 2016, 138(3): 031301 (14 pages)
Published Online: April 1, 2016
Article history
Received:
December 18, 2015
Revised:
January 22, 2016
Citation
Ayele, Y. Z., Barabadi, A., and Droguett, E. L. (April 1, 2016). "Risk-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Waste Handling Practices in the Arctic Drilling Operation." ASME. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. June 2016; 138(3): 031301. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032707
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Enhancement in Hydrodynamic Performance of a Quarter-Circular Breakwater Using a Porous Shield
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October 2025)
Torsional Vibration of Drill String Induced by Heave Motion in Deepwater Drilling
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (December 2025)
Research of wedge-shaped bow to ship side collision based on quasi-static and dynamic experiments
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng
Related Articles
Dynamic Bayesian Network-Based Risk Assessment for Arctic Offshore Drilling Waste Handling Practices
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October,2016)
An Expert-Based Model for Reliability Analysis of Arctic Oil and Gas Processing Facilities
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October,2016)
Layout Optimization of a Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Facility Using Inherent Safety Principles
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2016)
A Two-Dimensional Hydroelastoplasticity Method of a Container Ship in Extreme Waves
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (April,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Ageing & Life Extention of Offshore Structures Introduction
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Regulatory and Class Considerations Introduction
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Risk Analysis Perspectives as Development Approach in Offshore Oil Production (PSAM-0016)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)