In the literature, the continuous line bucket (CLB) lifting system and the pipe lifting system (PLS), as two typical mineral lifting methods in deep sea mining (DSM) systems, have been discussed since the 1960s. The purpose of this paper is to determine an appropriate lifting method for deep sea mining systems at different working conditions. The determination is based on the comparison of the analysis results of the two typical lifting methods considering the technology performance and the profitability. The analysis is based on a numerical calculation performed in a matlab environment. This paper shows the comparison of the results of the CLB system and PLS in terms of the lifting efficiency, the energy consumption, and the profitability. The research reported in this paper can be utilized to select a proper lifting method for a DSM project depending on its specific criteria analysis.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2017
Research-Article
Continuous Line Bucket Lifting Versus Pipe Lifting
Wenbin Ma,
Wenbin Ma
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: W.Ma@tudelft.nl
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: W.Ma@tudelft.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
Dingena Schott,
Dingena Schott
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: D.L.Schott@tudelft.nl
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: D.L.Schott@tudelft.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
Gabriël Lodewijks
Gabriël Lodewijks
Professor
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Lodewijks@tudelft.nl
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Lodewijks@tudelft.nl
Search for other works by this author on:
Wenbin Ma
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: W.Ma@tudelft.nl
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: W.Ma@tudelft.nl
Dingena Schott
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: D.L.Schott@tudelft.nl
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: D.L.Schott@tudelft.nl
Gabriël Lodewijks
Professor
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Lodewijks@tudelft.nl
Department of Maritime and
Transport Technology,
Delft University of Technology,
Mekelweg 2,
Delft 2628 CD, The Netherlands
e-mail: G.Lodewijks@tudelft.nl
Contributed by the Ocean, Offshore, and Arctic Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 9, 2016; final manuscript received March 13, 2017; published online May 25, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Xi-Ying Zhang.
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Oct 2017, 139(5): 051704 (9 pages)
Published Online: May 25, 2017
Article history
Received:
November 9, 2016
Revised:
March 13, 2017
Citation
Ma, W., Schott, D., and Lodewijks, G. (May 25, 2017). "Continuous Line Bucket Lifting Versus Pipe Lifting." ASME. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. October 2017; 139(5): 051704. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036375
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Surrogate Model to Predict Stress Intensity Factor of Tubular Joint Based on Bayesian Optimization Gaussian Process Regression
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (April 2025)
Barriers to Data Analytics for Energy Efficiency in the Maritime Industry
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (June 2025)
Oblique wave scattering by a pair of asymmetric inverse Π-shaped breakwater
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng
Related Articles
A Frictional Contact Element for Flexible Pipe Modeling With Finite Macroelements
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (October,2018)
Numerical Analysis for Cutting a Subsea Bundle
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (January,0001)
Subsea Pipeline Lateral Buckling Design—Strain Concentration or Strain Capacity Reduction Factors
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (June,2018)
Research on the Pump–Vessel Combined Ore Lifting Equipment for
Deep-Sea Rigid Pipe Mining System
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (February,2008)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Re-Qualification of Existing Subsea Pipelines for CO 2 and H 2 Transport, Structural Integrity Challenges
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
ISO 19901-1 Petroleum and Natural Gas Industries — Specific Requirements for Offshore Structures — Part 1: Metocean Design and Operating Considerations
Ageing and Life Extension of Offshore Facilities
Identification of Temporal Interval Relations of Frequent Patterns during Incremental Phase
International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, 3rd (ICCET 2011)