Abstract

The combined offshore wind and wave energy on an integrated platform is an economical solution for the offshore energy industry as they share the infrastructure and ocean space. The study presents the dynamic analysis of the Submerged Tension-Leg Platform (STLP) combined with a heaving-type point absorber wave energy converter (WEC). The feasibility study of the hybrid concept is performed using the aero-servo-hydro-elastic simulation tool FAST. The study analyzes the responses of the combined system to understand the influence of the WECs on the STLP platform for various operating conditions of the wind turbine under regular and irregular waves. Positive synergy is observed between the platform and the WECs, and the study also focuses on the forces and moments developed at the interface of the tower and platform to understand the effect of wind energy on the turbine tower and the importance of motion amplitudes on the performance of the combined platform system. The mean and standard deviation for the translation and rotational motions of combined wind and wave energy converters are determined for different sea states under both regular and irregular waves to analyze the change in responses of the structure. The study observed a reduction in motion amplitudes of the hybrid floating system with the addition of the wave energy converters around the STLP floater to improve the energy efficiency of the hybrid system. The study helps in understanding the best possible arrangement of point absorber-type wave energy converters at the conceptual stage of the design process.

References

1.
Muliawan
,
M. J.
,
Karimirad
,
M.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Extreme Responses of a Combined Spar-Type Floating Wind Turbine and Floating Wave Energy Converter (STC) System With Survival Modes
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
65
, pp.
71
82
.
2.
Wan
,
L.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Experimental and Numerical Study of Hydrodynamic Responses of a Combined Wind and Wave Energy Converter Concept in Survival Modes
,”
Coast. Eng.
,
104
, pp.
151
169
.
3.
Karimirad
,
M.
, and
Koushan
,
K.
,
2016
, “
WindWEC: Combining Wind and Wave Energy Inspired by Hywind and Wavestar
,”
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications
,
Birmingham, UK
,
Nov. 20–23
, pp.
96
101
.
4.
Karimirad
,
M.
, and
Michailides
,
C.
,
2018
, “
Effect of Misaligned Wave and Wind Action on the Response of the Combined Concept Wind WEC
,”
Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Madrid, Spain
,
June 17–22
, Paper ID-OMAE2018-77078.
5.
Kobayashi
,
M.
,
Shimada
,
K.
, and
Fujihira
,
T.
,
1987
, “
Study on Dynamic Response of a TLP in Waves
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Artic Eng.
,
109
(
1
), pp.
61
66
.
6.
Lee
,
H.
,
Bae
,
Y. H.
, and
Cho
,
H.
,
2016
, “
One-Way Coupled Response Analysis Between Floating Wind-Wave Hybrid Platform and Wave Energy Converters
,”
J. Ocean Eng. Technol.
,
30
(
2
), pp.
84
90
.
7.
Luan
,
C.
,
Michailides
,
C.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2014
, “
Modeling and Analysis of a 5 MW Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Combined With Three Flap-Type Wave Energy Converters
,”
Proceedings of the33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
California
,
June 8–13
, Paper ID-OMAE2014-24215.
8.
Shen
,
M.
,
Hu
,
Z.
, and
Liu
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Dynamic Response and Viscous Effect Analysis of a TLP-Type Floating Wind Turbine Using a Coupled Aero-hydro-Mooring Dynamic Code
,”
Renewable Energy
,
99
, pp.
800
812
.
9.
Chen
,
W.
,
Gao
,
F.
,
Meng
,
X.
,
Chen
,
B.
, and
Ren
,
A.
,
2016
, “
W2P: A High-Power Integrated Generation Unit for Offshore Wind Power and Ocean Wave Energy
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
128
, pp.
41
47
.
10.
Gao
,
Z.
,
Moan
,
T.
,
Wan
,
L.
, and
Michailides
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Comparative Numerical and Experimental Study of Two Combined Wind and Wave Energy Concepts
,”
J. Ocean Eng. Sci.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
36
51
.
11.
Perez-Collazo
,
C.
,
Greaves
,
D.
, and
Iglesias
,
G.
,
2018
, “
Hydrodynamic Response of the WEC sub-System of a Novel Hybrid Wind-Wave Energy Converter
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
171
, pp.
307
325
.
12.
Bachynski
,
E. E.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Point Absorber Design for a Combined Wind and Wave Energy Converter on a Tension-Leg Support Structure
,”
Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Nantes, France
,
June 9–14
, Paper ID-OMAE2013-10429, pp.
1
10
.
13.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2007
,
Dynamic Modelling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine
.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
, Technical Report No. NREL/TLP-500-41958.
14.
Sinha
,
A.
,
Karmakar
,
D.
, and
Guedes Soares
,
C.
,
2015
, “Numerical Modelling of an Array of Heaving Point Absorbers,”
Renewable Energies Offshore
,
C.
Guedes Soares
, ed.,
Taylor & Francis Group
,
London, UK
, pp.
383
391
.
15.
Lee
,
C. H.
,
1995
,
WAMIT Theory Manual
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
,
Cambridge, MA
.
16.
Wandji
,
W. N.
,
Natarajan
,
A.
, and
Dimitrov
,
N.
,
2016
, “
Development and Design of a Semi-Floater Substructure for Multi-Megawatt Wind Turbines at 50 m Water Depths
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
125
, pp.
226
237
.
17.
Han
,
Y.
,
Le
,
C.
,
Ding
,
H.
,
Cheng
,
Z.
, and
Zhang
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Stability and Dynamic Response Analysis of a Submerged Tension leg Platform for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
129
, pp.
68
82
.
18.
Wan
,
L.
,
Greco
,
M.
,
Lugni
,
C.
,
Gao
,
Z.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2017
, “
A Combined Wind and Wave Energy-Converter Concept in Survival Mode: Numerical and Experimental Study in Regular Waves With a Focus on Water Entry and Exit
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
63
, pp.
200
216
.
19.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2009
,
Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3
. NREL, Technical Report, USA.
20.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Matha
,
D.
,
2011
, “
Dynamics of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine-Analysis of Three Concepts
,”
Wind Energy
,
14
(
4
), pp.
557
569
.
21.
Hall
,
M.
, and
Goupee
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Validation of a Lumped-Mass Mooring Line Model With Deepcwind Semisubmersible Model Test Data
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
104
, pp.
590
603
.
22.
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
J.
,
He
,
Y.
, and
Gu
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Dynamic Response Analysis of a Multi-column Tension-Leg-Type Floating Wind Turbine Under Combined Wind and Wave Loading
,”
J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
Y103
111
.
23.
Wayman
,
E. N.
,
Sclavouns
,
P. D.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Musial
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Coupled Dynamic Modelling of Floating Wind Turbine Systems
,”
Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference
,
Houston, TX
,
May 1–4
.
24.
Johannessesn
,
K.
,
Meling
,
T. S.
, and
Hayer
,
S.
,
2001
, “
Joint Distribution for Wind and Waves in the Northern North Sea
,”
Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng.
,
12
(
1
), pp.
1
8
.
25.
Si
,
Y.
,
Chen
,
Z.
,
Zeng
,
W.
,
Sun
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
D.
,
Ma
,
X.
, and
Qian
,
P.
,
2021
, “
The Influence of Power-Take-off Control on the Dynamic Response and Power Output of Combined Semi-Submersible Floating Wind Turbine and Point-Absorber Wave Energy Converters
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
227
, pp.
1
23
.
26.
Hansen
,
R. H.
,
2013
,
Design and Control of the Power Take-Off System for a Wave Energy Converter With Multiple Absorbers
, PhD Thesis,
Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University
,
Denmark
, pp.
1
266
.
You do not currently have access to this content.