Management systems have had long widespread acceptance in many industries for various applications: notably, quality, safety, and environment. In recent years, the North American onshore pipeline industry has started adopting management system principles for the management of pipeline integrity. This paper discusses the rationale for adopting a systems approach to safety and presents a safety and loss management system template that may be used for the full life cycle of a pipeline, from concept to abandonment.

1.
ISO 9001
, 2000, Quality Management Systems—Requirements, International Organization for Standards.
2.
ISO 14001
, 2004, Environmental Management Systems—Requirements With Guidance for Use, International Organization for Standards.
3.
OHSAS 18001
, 1999, Health and Safety Management System.
4.
Responsible Care, Canadian Chemical Producers Association.
5.
IRP 9: Basic Safety Program for the Upstream Petroleum Industry, 1999, Canadian Petroleum Safety Council (Enform).
6.
SOR/2001-37, 2001, Railway Safety Management System Regulations, P.C. 2001-24 9, Transport Canada, Ottawa.
7.
Canadian Aviation Regulations 2005-2, Part I, Subpart 7, Safety Management System Requirements, Transport Canada, Ottawa.
8.
API Standard 1160 Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines, 2001, American Petroleum Institute.
9.
ASME Standard B31.8S-2001 Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
10.
Guidance Notes for the Onshore Pipeline Regulations, 1999, Amendment 1–20 Jan. 2003, National Energy Board.
11.
CSA Z662 Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems, Canadian Standards Association.
12.
1987,
New Technology and Human Error
,
J.
Rasmussen
,
K.
Duncan
, and
J.
Leplat
, eds.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
13.
Leveson
,
N. G.
, 1995,
Safeware: System Safety and Computers
,
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
.
14.
Johnson
,
W. G.
, 1975, “
MORT: The Management Oversight and Risk Tree
,”
J. Safety Res.
0022-4375,
7
, pp.
4
15
.
15.
Benner
,
L.
, 1975, “
Accident Investigations: Multilinear Events Sequencing Methods
,”
J. Safety Res.
0022-4375,
7
, pp.
67
73
.
16.
Perrow
,
C.
, 1984,
Normal Accidents: Living With High-Risk Technologies
,
Basic Books
,
New York
.
17.
Dörner
,
D.
, 1996,
The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations
, translated by Rita Kimber and Robert Kimbert,
Metropolitan Books
,
New York
.
18.
Reason
,
J.
, 1990,
Human Error
,
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
.
19.
Reason
,
J.
, 1997,
Managing the Risk of Organizational Accidents
,
Ashgate
,
Aldershot
.
20.
Shappell
,
S. A.
, and
Wiegmann
,
D. A.
, 2000, “
The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System—HFACS
,” Final Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7.
21.
Rasmussen
,
J.
, 1997, “
Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem
,”
Safety Sci.
0925-7535,
27
(
2/3
), pp.
183
213
.
22.
Leveson
,
N. G.
, 2004, “
A New Accident Model for Engineering Safer Systems
,”
Safety Sci.
0925-7535,
42
(
4
), pp.
237
270
.
23.
1997, “
The Westray Story: A Predictable Path to Disaster
,” Westray Mine Public Inquiry Report.
You do not currently have access to this content.