An important safety factor to be considered when designing a plant is the prevention of overpressure-induced explosions, to which many plants are vulnerable because of pressurized fluids in plant components. A pilot-operated pressure relief valve is a core device for venting off overpressure formed inside vessels and pipelines. The pilot-operated pressure relief valve has a highly complicated structure, and its design and production should be thoroughly studied. In this study, a simplified structure for the pilot-operated pressure relief valve was proposed to facilitate the design and production processes, and the effective ranges of its design variables were determined to enable the prediction of the impact of the design variables in the design and production processes. The ranges determined were validated by a numerical flow analysis and experiment as follows. We calculated the maximum orifice diameter at which the main valve does not open and examined the minimum orifice diameter that can resist the impact of strong shock waves. Additionally, we defined the orifice diameter range that ensures the stable opening and closing of the main valve under various pressure conditions. The effective ranges of the design variables determined in this study can be used to ensure safe operation of a pilot-operated pressure relief valve under various pressure conditions with the design of the proposed simplified structure.

References

1.
ASME
,
2001
, “
Pressure Relief Devices Performance Test Codes
,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, Standard No. ASME PTC 25-2001.
2.
API
,
2000
, “
Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-Relieving Devices in Refineries Part I: Sizing and Selection
,” 7th ed., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. API RP 520.
3.
ISO
,
2004
, “
Safety Devices for Protection against Excessive Pressure Part 1: Safety Valves
,”
International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 4126-1.
4.
ISO
,
2013
, “
Safety Devices for Protection against Excessive Pressure Part 4: Pilot Operated Safety Valves
,” 2nd ed.,
International Organization for Standardization
, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 4126-4.
5.
Ray
,
A.
,
1987
, “
Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of a Relief Valve
,”
Simulation
,
31
(
5
), pp.
167
172
.
6.
Moussou
,
P.
,
Gibert
,
R. J.
,
Brasseur
,
G.
,
Teygeman
,
C.
,
Ferrari
,
J.
, and
Rit
,
J. F.
,
2010
, “
Instability of Pressure Relief Valves in Water Pipes
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
132
(
4
), p.
041308
.
7.
Beune
,
A.
,
Kuerten
,
J. G. M.
, and
van Heumen
,
M. P. C.
,
2012
, “
CFD Analysis With Fluid–Structure Interaction of Opening High-Pressure Safety Valves
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
64
, pp.
108
116
.
8.
Kourakos
,
V.
,
Rambaud
,
P.
,
Buchlin
,
J.
, and
Chabane
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Flowforce in a Safety Relief Valve Under Incompressible, Compressible, and Two-Phase Flow Conditions
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011305
.
9.
Song
,
X.
,
Cui
,
L.
,
Cao
,
M.
,
Cao
,
W.
,
Park
,
Y.
, and
Dempster
,
W. M.
,
2014
, “
A CFD Analysis of the Dynamics of a Direct-Operated Safety Relief Valve Mounted on a Pressure Vessel
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
81
, pp.
407
419
.
10.
Aldeeb
,
A. A.
,
Darby
,
R.
, and
Arndt
,
S.
,
2014
, “
The Dynamic Response of Pressure Relief Valves in Vapor or Gas Service Part II: Experimental Investigation
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
31
, pp.
127
132
.
11.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Peric
,
M.
,
2002
,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
12.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
2006
, “
Turbulence Modeling for CFD
,”
DCW Industries
,
Flintridge, CA
.
13.
ANSYS
,
2011
, “
Release 14.0, ANSYS CFX–Solver Theory Guide
,”
ANSYS
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
14.
ANSYS
,
2011
, “
Release 14.0, ANSYS CFX–Solver Modeling Guide
,”
ANSYS
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
15.
ANSYS
,
2011
, “
Release 14.0, ANSYS CFX–Reference Guide
,”
ANSYS
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
16.
Schlichting
,
H.
,
1979
,
Boundary-Layer Theory
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.