Abstract

The Influence of application of the mean strain on the fatigue life was investigated for Type 316 stainless steel in the simulated pressurized water reactor (PWR) primary water environment. Low-cycle fatigue tests were conducted for a constant mean strain by controlling the strain range to be 1.2%. The applied strain rates were 0.4%/s, 0.004%/s, or 0.001%/s. The applied mean strain was 15% in nominal strain. In addition, cold worked specimens were also used for the tests without applying the mean strain. The cold working simulated the application of mean strain without an increase in surface roughness due to the application of plastic deformation. By inducing the cold working at low temperature, the influence of martensitic phase on the fatigue life was also examined. The PWR water environment reduced the fatigue life and the degree of the fatigue life reduction was consistent with the prediction model of the code issued by the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (JSME) and NUREG/CR-6909 Rev. 1. Increases in the maximum peak stress and stress range caused by cold working did not cause any apparent change in the fatigue life. It was revealed that the 10.5 wt% martensitic phase and the increase in the surface roughness caused by the application of 15% mean strain did not bring about further fatigue life reduction. The current JSME and NUREG/CR-6909 models were applicable for predicting the fatigue in the PWR water environment even when the mean strain or cold working was applied.

References

1.
Arioka
,
K.
,
Yamada
,
T.
,
Terachi
,
T.
, and
Chiba
,
G.
,
2007
, “
Cold Work and Temperature Dependence of Stress Corrosion Crack Growth of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Hydrogenated and Oxygenated High-Temperature Water
,”
Corrosion
,
63
(
12
), pp.
1114
1123
.10.5006/1.3278329
2.
Higuchi
,
M.
,
2008
, “
Comparison of Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Methods in LWR Water
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2008-61087.10.1115/PVP2008-61087
3.
Chopra
,
O.
, and
Stevens
,
G. L.
,
2017
, “
Effect of LWR Coolant Environments on the Fatigue Life of Reactor Materials
,” USNRC, Washington DC, Report No.
NUREG/CR-6909 Rev. 1
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0706/ML070660620.pdf
4.
De Baglion
,
L.
,
Mendez
,
J.
,
Le Duff
,
J. A.
, and
Lefrancois
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Influence of PWR Primary Water on LCF Behavior of Type 304 L Austenitic Stainless Steel at 300 Degrees C: Comparison With Results Obtained in Vacuum or in Air
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2012-78767.10.1115/PVP2012-78767
5.
Japan Society Mechanical Engineers
,
2009
, “
Codes for Nuclear Power Generation Facilities: Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants
,” JSME Paper No.
S NF1-2009
. https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:38086321
6.
ASME
,
2010
, “
Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components – ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III
,”
Code Case N-792: Fatigue Evaluations Including Environmental Effects
,
ASME
,
New York
.
7.
Kamaya
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Environmental Effect on Fatigue Strength of Stainless Steel in PWR Primary Water – Role of Crack Growth Acceleration in Fatigue Life Reduction
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
55
, pp.
102
111
.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.05.008
8.
Kamaya
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Influence of Strain Range on Fatigue Life Reduction of Stainless Steel in PWR Primary Water
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
40
(
12
), pp.
2194
2203
.10.1111/ffe.12650
9.
Kamaya
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Mean Stress Effect on Fatigue Properties of Type 316 Stainless Steel in Pressurized Water Reactor Primary Water Environment
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
141
(
5
), p.
051402
.10.1115/1.4043997
10.
Kamaya
,
M.
, and
Kawakubo
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Mean Stress Effect on Fatigue Strength of Stainless Steel
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
74
, pp.
20
29
.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.12.006
11.
Solomon
,
H. D.
,
Amzallag
,
C.
,
Vallee
,
A. J.
, and
DeLair
,
R. E.
,
2005
, “
107 Cycle Fatigue Limit of Type 304 L SS in Air and PWR Water, at 150 °C and 300 °C
,”
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System
, Salt Lake City, UT, Aug. 14–18, pp.
1083
1089
.
12.
Sakaguchi
,
K.
,
Nomura
,
Y.
,
Suzuki
,
S.
, and
Kanasaki
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Applicability of the Modified Rate Approach Method Under Various Conditions Simulating Actual Plant Conditions
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93220.10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93220
13.
Huin
,
N.
,
Tsutsumi
,
K.
,
Legras
,
L.
,
Couvant
,
T.
,
Loisnard
,
D.
,
Mendez
,
J.
, and
Henaff
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Fatigue Crack Initiation of 304 L Stainless Steel in Simulated PWR Primary Environment: Relative Effect of Strain Rate
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2012-78340.10.1115/PVP2012-78340
You do not currently have access to this content.