Abstract

Nuclear power has gone through several transitional phases worldwide with early development, design, and construction in 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, particularly in Japan and U.S. A relatively less active period followed in U.S. in 1990s followed by resurgence of interest and activities in 2000s. Currently, some countries are focusing on advanced reactor technology and smaller modular reactors instead of large light water reactors. Along with the transition in the need for power and technological advances, one other major change has occurred. Most of the workforce that participated in development, design, research, construction, and operation of currently operating plants is no longer active. There were some major research programs conducted during those years to develop methodology and prove the technology. Much of this knowledge is still very relevant and applicable and would be useful to young engineers and new professionals coming to the nuclear industry. One of such programs is seismic verification of major structures, systems, and components (SSCs) by tests in Japan during the period of 1981–2004 at a large shaking table facility. Opportunities for conducting such large tests are not likely in the current environment of the industry and, therefore, one of the objectives of this paper is to summarize some earlier tests to raise awareness for the newcomers to the industry. This paper discusses piping tests conducted in Japan at the era. In particular, this paper focuses on: insights obtained from the test results; comparisons of test results with responses during actual earthquakes; collaboration of Japan and U.S. in these tests; observations on robustness of Japanese seismic design; how the results relate to current issues; and use of these results from the future perspectives.

References

1.
U.S. NRC
,
1994
, “
Technical Guidelines for Aseismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants
,” A Translation of JEAG 4601-1987, Japan Electric Association,” Washington, DC, Report No.
NUREG/CR-6241
.https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1307/ML13079A392.pdf
2.
NUPEC,
1991
, “Summery Report of Seismic Proving Test for PWR Primary Coolant Loop System,” NUPEC, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo.
3.
NUPEC,
1987
, “Summery Report of Seismic Proving Test for BWR Primary Loop Recirculation System,” NUPEC, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo.
4.
NUPEC,
1998
, “Summery Report of Seismic Proving Test for Main Steam and Feedwater Piping System,” NUPEC, Toranomon, Minato-ku, Tokyo.
5.
Fujita
,
K.
,
Nakamura
,
T.
, and
Akiyama
,
H.
,
1989
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability for the PWR Primary Coolant System
,” ASME PVP, Vol. 1.182, pp.
303
308
.
6.
Akiyama
,
H.
,
Koyama
,
K.
, and
Tai
,
K.
,
1990
, “
Study of Modal Damping of the PWR Primary Coolant System
,”
ASME PVP, Vol. 1.197, pp. 27–31.
7.
Akiyama
,
H.
,
Shibata
,
H.
,
Kato
,
M.
,
Kawakami
,
S.
,
Ohno
,
T.
,
Koyama
,
K.
,
Tai
,
K.
,
Yoshikawa
,
E.
, and
Nakamura
,
T.
,
1991
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the PWR Primary Coolant Loop System
,” Paper No. SMiRT11-K16-2.
8.
Sato
,
H.
,
Shigeta
,
M.
, and
Karasawa
,
Y.
,
1987
, “
Seismic Proving Test of BWR Primary Loop Recirculation System
,” Paper No. SMiRT 9-K, pp.
1115
1120
.
9.
Park
,
Y.
,
De Grassi
,
G.
,
Bezler
,
P.
, and
Hofmayer
,
C.
,
1998
, “
Large Scale Vibration Test of Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System With Conventional and Energy Absorbing Supports (Evaluation of Test Results and Post-Test Analysis)
,” BNL, Upton, NY, Report No.
NUREG/CR6559(BNL-NUREG 52532
).https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1307/ML13079A451.pdf
10.
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
,
Abe
,
H.
, and
Kuroda
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 1: Seismic Response and Absorbed Energy of Elasto-Plastic Damper LED
,”
ASME PVP.
11.
Tai
,
K.
,
Ito
,
T.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Kuroda
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
, and
Abe
,
H.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 2: Simulation for M-Line Energy Absorbing Support Piping
,” ASME PVP.
12.
Namita
,
Y.
,
Ono
,
S.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
, and
Abe
,
H.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 3: Analytical Evaluation of BWR Feedwater Piping Supported by Energy Absorbing Support
,”
ASME PVP.
13.
Namita
,
Y.
,
Ono
,
S.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
,
Abe
,
H.
, and
Kuroda
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 4: Response Characteristics of BWR Feed Water Piping Supported by Energy Absorbing Support Under Very Large Seismic Input
,”
ASME PVP.
14.
Ito
,
T.
,
Kojima
,
N.
,
Fujita
,
K.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
,
Abe
,
H.
, and
Kuroda
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 5: Performance of a Multi - Excitation Simulator at the Seismic Tests of a Piping System Supported by Conventional Supports
,”
ASME PVP.
15.
Tai
,
K.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
,
Abe
,
H.
, and
Kuroda
,
K.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 1: Simulation for PWR Main Steam Piping
,” Paper No. SMiRT 14-K15/1.
16.
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Sasaki
,
Y.
,
Abe
,
H.
,
Kuroda
,
K.
,
Ono
,
S.
, and
Namita
,
Y.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 2: Simulation for BWR Feedwater Piping
,” Paper No. SMiRT 14-K15/2.
17.
Park
,
J.
,
DeGrassi
,
G. Y.
,
Hofmayer
,
C.
, and
Chokshi
,
N.
,
1997
, “
Proving Test on the Seismic Reliability of the Main Steam and Feed Water Piping System Part 3: Analysis of Nuclear Piping System Seismic Tests With Conventional and Energy Absorbing Supports
,” Paper No. SMiRT 14-K15/3.
18.
Suzuki
,
K.
, and
Abe
,
H.
,
2005
, “
Seismic Proving Test of Ultimate Piping Strength (Safety Margin of Seismic Design Code for Piping)
,”
ASME
Paper No. 2005-71005.10.1115/2005-71005
19.
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Abe
,
H.
,
Ichihashi
,
I.
, and
Suzuki
,
K.
,
2005
, “
Seismic Proving Test of Ultimate Piping Strength (Status of Design Method Confirmation Test)
,” Paper No. SMiRT17-K15-2.
20.
Information Notice IN86-106
,
1986
, “
Feedwater Line Brake
,” U.S. NRC, Washington, DC.
21.
Information Notice IN2006-08
, 2006, “Secondary Piping Rupture at the Mihama Power Station in Japan,” U.S. NRC, Washington, DC.
22.
Namita
,
Y.
,
Suzuki
,
K.
,
Abe
,
H.
,
Ichihashi
,
I.
, and
Shiratori
,
M.
,
2005
, “
Seismic Proving Test of Eroded Piping (Status of Eroded Piping Component and System Test)
,” Paper No. SMiRT17-K15-3.
23.
U.S. NRC
, 2017, “
Seismic Design Standards and Calculational Methods in the United States and Japan
,” U.S. NRC, Washington, DC, Report No.
NUREG/CR-7230
.https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr7230/index.html
24.
IAEA,
2013
, “
Review of Seismic Evaluation Methodologies for NPPs Based on a Benchmark Exercise
,” IAEA, Vienna, Austria, Report No. IAEA TECDOC 1772.
25.
NRA Japan, 2013, “Outline of New Regulatory Requirements for Light Water NPPs (Earthquakes and Tsunamis),” and “Japan's Nuclear Regulation Against Natural Hazards After the Fukushima Daiichi Accident,” Presentation at IAEA Technical Meeting, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 2016, No. J20-TM-52527.
You do not currently have access to this content.