Abstract

Freight rail networks serve a key role in transporting bulk goods to accommodate changing market demands and to serve public needs. Network analyses of such systems can provide important insights into enhancing transportation efficiency and system resilience. This paper develops and investigates a topological analysis model for network efficiency, which is associated with the connectedness of a network's nodes by its links and their corresponding network attributes. This model allows analyzing network topologies with or without assigned weights to their nodes and links based on different attributes. Key attributes may include physical length of links, commodity types and volume of goods transported through links, and dwell-time at nodes, and origination termination volumes of goods, types of goods moved, and origins and destination of goods. The model presented here enables (1) defining distinctions that may be employed for the assignment of node and link weights, (2) gaining an understanding of node and link criticality, and (3) providing methods for objectively maintaining and enhancing network performance. Such analyses can inform rail managers and executives in planning expansions, route or freight changes, or preparations for potential node or link failures. A case study of an aggregate U.S. freight rail network along with other example topologies is presented to demonstrate the use of selected network attributes and their influence on connectedness efficiency and the impacts of node and link failures on the overall transport efficiency.

References

1.
Dictionary.com Dictionary,
2021
, “Efficiency,” Dictionary.com, Oakland, CA, accessed Apr. 22, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/efficiency
2.
Latora
,
V.
, and
Marchiori
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Efficient Behavior of Small-World Networks
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
,
87
(
19
), p.
198701
.10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
3.
Salomon
,
J.
,
Broggi
,
M.
,
Kruse
,
S.
,
Weber
,
S.
, and
Beer
,
M.
,
2020
, “
Resilience Decision-Making for Complex Systems
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part B: Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
2
), p.
020901
.10.1115/1.4044907
4.
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Ayyub
,
B. M.
,
Saadat
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
D.
, and
Huang
,
H.
,
2020
, “
A Double-Weighted Vulnerability Assessment Model for Metrorail Transit Networks and Its Application in Shanghai Metro
,”
Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot.
,
29
, p.
100358
.10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100358
5.
Nagurney
,
A.
, and
Qiang
,
Q.
,
2007
, “
A Network Efficiency Measure for Congested Networks
,”
Europhys. Lett. (EPL)
,
79
(
3
), p.
38005
.10.1209/0295-5075/79/38005
6.
Saadat
,
Y.
,
Ayyub
,
B. M.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
D.
, and
Huang
,
H.
,
2019
, “
Resilience of Metrorail Networks: Quantification With Washington, D.C. as a Case Study
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part B: Mech. Eng.
,
5
(
4
), p.
041011
.10.1115/1.4044038
7.
Wu
,
S.
,
Zhu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
N.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
X.
, and
Sun
,
D. J.
,
2021
, “
Urban Rail Transit System Network Reliability Analysis Based on a Coupled Map Lattice Model
,”
J. Adv. Transp.
,
2021
, p.
5548956
.10.1155/2021/5548956
8.
De Montis
,
A.
,
Barthélemy
,
M.
,
Chessa
,
A.
, and
Vespignani
,
A.
,
2007
, “
The Structure of Interurban Traffic: A Weighted Network Analysis
,”
Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des.
,
34
(
5
), pp.
905
924
.10.1068/b32128
9.
Pittwood
,
I. H.
, and
Cetinkaya
,
E. K.
,
2017
, “
Modeling Link Weights in Backbone Networks
,” 2017 Ninth International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (
RNDM
), IEEE, Alghero, Italy, Sept. 4–6.10.1109/RNDM.2017.8093021
10.
Zhang
,
L.
,
Zhao
,
Y.
,
Chen
,
D.
, and
Zhang
,
X.
,
2021
, “
Analysis of Network Robustness in Weighted and Unweighted Approaches: A Case Study of the Air Transport Network in the Belt and Road Region
,”
J. Adv. Transp.
,
2021
, p.
8810254
.10.1155/2021/8810254
11.
Newman
,
M.
,
2018
,
Networks
, 2nd ed.,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
12.
Newman
,
M. E. J.
,
2004
, “
Analysis of Weighted Networks
,”
Phys. Rev. E
,
70
(
5
), p.
056131
.10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056131
13.
Guidotti
,
R.
,
Gardoni
,
P.
, and
Chen
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
Network Reliability Analysis With Link and Nodal Weights and Auxiliary Nodes
,”
Struct. Saf.
,
65
, pp.
12
26
.10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001
14.
Amtrak
,
2020
, “Amtrak Host Railroad Report Card 2020,” Amtrak, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://www.amtrak.com/on-time-performance
15.
Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary,
2021
, “Connectivity,” Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA, accessed Apr. 22, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/connectivity
16.
Diestel
,
R.
,
2005
,
Graph Theory
, Electronic ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, p.
9
.
17.
Baudry
,
J.
, and
Merriam
,
G.
,
1988
, “
Connectivity and Connectedness: Functional Versus Structural Patterns in Landscapes
,” Connectivity in Landscape Ecology, p. 23.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239061062_Connectivity_and_connectedness_Functional_versus_structural_patterns_in_landscapes#:~:text=Connectivity%20can%20be%20divided%(Baudry%20and%20Merriam%201988)%20
18.
Dictionary.com Dictionary,
2021
, “Connectedness,” Dictionary.com, Oakland, CA, accessed July 29, https://www.dictionary.com/browse/Connectedness
19.
Munkres
,
J.
,
2000
,
Topology
,
Pearson
, London, UK, p.
148
.
20.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2018, “National Transportation Statistics,” Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://www.bts.gov/topics/national-transportation-statistics
21.
Association of American Railroads,
2020, “Overview of America's Freight Railroads,” Association of American Railroads, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AAR-Railroad-101-Freight-Railroads-Fact-Sheet.pdf
22.
Federal Railroad Administration
,
2020
, “Freight Rail Overview,” Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://railroads.dot.gov/rail-network-development/freight-rail/freight-rail-overview
23.
Freight Cowboy—Shipment Management, 2018, “Top 10 Cities in the U.S. for Shipping: Freight Cowboy,” Freight Cowboy—Shipment Management, Houston, TX, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://freightcowboy.com/business/top-10-cities-in-the-us-for-shipping/
24.
Leonard
,
M.
,
2021
, “
Union Pacific Pauses Service From West Coast to Chicago as Congestion Hits Inland Terminals
,” Supply Chain Dive Website, Washington, DC, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/union-pacific-rail-west-coast-chicago-service-suspension-congestion/603452/
25.
Pignataro
,
A.
,
2020
, “20 for 2020: The Top 20 Cities for Freight Forwarders,” Global Trade Magazine, The Authority for U.S. Companies Doing Business Globally, Dallas, TX, accessed Apr. 22, 2022, https://www.globaltrademag.com/20-for-2020-the-top-20-cities-for-freight-forwarders/
You do not currently have access to this content.