Parabolic trough solar technology is the most proven and lowest cost large-scale solar power technology available today, primarily because of the nine large commercial-scale solar power plants that are operating in the California Mojave Desert. These plants, developed by Luz International Limited and referred to as Solar Electric Generating Systems (SEGS), range in size from 14–80 MW and represent 354 MW of installed electric generating capacity. More than of parabolic trough collector technology has been operating daily for up to 18 years, and as the year 2001 ended, these plants had accumulated 127 years of operational experience. The Luz collector technology has demonstrated its ability to operate in a commercial power plant environment like no other solar technology in the world. Although no new plants have been built since 1990, significant advancements in collector and plant design have been made possible by the efforts of the SEGS plants operators, the parabolic trough industry, and solar research laboratories around the world. This paper reviews the current state of the art of parabolic trough solar power technology and describes the R&D efforts that are in progress to enhance this technology. The paper also shows how the economics of future parabolic trough solar power plants are expected to improve.
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1997, “Renewable Energy Technology Characterizations,” EPRI Topical Report No. TR-109496, Palo Alto, CA.
2.
Pilkington Solar International GmbH, 1996, Status Report on Solar Thermal Power Plants, ISBN 3-9804901-0-6, Ko¨ln, Germany.
3.
Lotker, M., 1991, “Barriers to Commercialization of Large-Scale Solar Electricity: Lessons Learned from the Luz Experience,” Report No. SAND91-7014, SNL, Albuquerque, NM.
4.
Cohen, G., Kearney, D., and Kolb, G., 1999, “Final Report on the Operation and Maintenance Improvement Program for CSP Plants,” Report No. SAND99-1290, SNL, Albuquerque, NM.
5.
Zarza
, E.
, Valenzuela
, L.
, Leon
, J.
, Weyers
, H. D.
, Eickhoff
, M.
, Eck
, M.
, and Hennecke
, K.
, 2001
, “The DISS Project: Direct Steam Generation in Parabolic Trough Systems Operation and Maintenance Experience: Update on Project Status
,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
, 124
(2
), pp. 126
–133
.6.
Enermodal, 1999, “Cost Reduction Study for Solar Thermal Power Plants–Final Report,” Report prepared for The World Bank, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
7.
Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, L’Energia E L’Ambiente, 2001, “Technical Characteristics of the 40 MWe Solar Power Plant,” ENEA/TM/PRES/2001_12.
8.
Price, H., and Kearney, D., 1999, “Parabolic-Trough Technology Roadmap: A Pathway for Sustained Commercial Development and Deployment of Parabolic-Trough Technology,” NREL/TP-550-24748, NREL, Golden, CO.
9.
Lu¨pfert, E., Geyer, M., Schiel, W., Esteban, A., Osuna, R., Zarza, E., and Nava, P., 2001, “EUROTROUGH Design Issues And Prototype Testing At PSA,” Proc. of ASME Int. Solar Energy Conf.-Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, Washington, DC, April 21-25, pp. 389–394.
10.
Blanco-Muriel
, M.
, Alarco´n-Padilla
, D.
, Lo´pez-Maratalla
, T.
, and Lara-Coira
, M.
, 2001
, “Computing the Solar Vector
,” Sol. Energy
, 70
(5
), pp. 431
–441
.11.
Johnston, G., and Lu¨pfert, E., 2001, “Concentrator Surface Characterization of the EuroTrough Prototype at the PSA Using Close-Range Photogrammetry,” Solar Thermal Power Plants and Solar Chemical Processes, Advances and Perspectives for International Cooperation, K.-H. Funken and W. Bucher, eds., DLR Forschungsbericht 2001-10, ISSN 1434-8454, pp. 42–45.
12.
Duke Solar, 2000, “Task 2 Report: New Space-Frame Parabolic Trough Structure,” Prepared for NREL by Duke Solar, Raleigh, NC.
13.
Gee, R., 2001, “Parabolic Trough Wind Tunnel Testing,” Duke Solar, Presentation at Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC. Available on-line at: http://www.eren.doe.gov/troughnet/documents/forum2001.html
14.
IST, 2001, “Collector Development,” Presentation at Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC. Available on-line at: http://www.eren.doe.gov/troughnet/documents/forum2001.html
15.
Paneltec Corp., 2000. “Structural Facet Fabrication—Phase II Manufacturability Study,” Report to SNL, Paneltec, Lafayette, CO.
16.
Jorgensen, G., 2001, “Summary Status of Most Promising Candidate Advanced Solar Mirrors (Testing and Development Activities),” Milestone report to DOE, NREL, Golden, CO.
17.
Dudley, V. E., Kolb, G. J., and Mahoney, A. R., 1994, “Test Results: SEGS LS-2 Solar Collector,” Report No. SAND94-1884, SNL, Albuquerque, NM.
18.
Mahoney, A., Burchett, S., Reed, S., and Snidow, R., 2002, “Finite Element Analysis of Stainless Steel—Pyrex® Housekeeper Glass-to-Metal Seals,” SNL, Albuquerque, NM, to be published.
19.
Cable, R., 2001, “Solar Trough Generation—The California Experience, KJC Operating Company,” Presentation at Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC.
20.
Solel Solar Systems, 2001, Solartechnik Prufung Forschung: October 29, 2001—Solel Absorber Sample (SOL10111000Z), Beit Shemesh, Israel.
21.
Mahoney
, A. R.
, and Price
, H.
, 2002
, “Solar Field Performance of New UVAC Receivers at SEGS VI,” KJC Operation Co
. ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
, submitted for publication.22.
San Vicente
, G.
, Morales
, A.
, and Gutie´rrez
, M. T.
, 2001
, “Preparation and Characterization of Sol-Gel TiO2 Antireflective Coatings for Silicon
,” Thin Solid Films
, 391
(1
), July, pp. 133
–137
.23.
Morales, A., and Ajona, J. I., 1998, “Durability, Performance and Scalability of Sol-Gel Front Surface Mirrors and Selective Absorbers,” Proc. of 9th Int. Symp. on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Font-Romeu, France, June.
24.
Zhang
, Q.
, Zhao
, K.
, Zang
, B.
, Wang
, L.
, Shen
, A.
, Zhou
, Z.
, Lu
, D.
, Xie
, D.
, and Li
, B.
, 1998
, “New Cermet Solar Coatings for Solar Thermal Electricity Applications
,” Sol. Energy
, 64
, pp. 109
–114
.25.
Gee, R., and Winston, R., 2001, “A Non-Imaging Secondary Reflector for Parabolic Trough Concentrators,” Report to NREL, Duke Solar Energy, Raleigh, NC.
26.
Solutia, 1999, “Therminol® VP-1 Heat Transfer Fluid,” Technical Bulletin 7239115B, Solutia, St. Louis, MO, Available at: www.therminol.com.
27.
Dow, 2001, “DowTherm A—Synthetic Organic Heat Transfer Fluid,” Product Information No. 176-01463-1101 AMS, Available at: www.dowtherm.com.
28.
Geyer, M., 1991, “Thermal Storage for Solar Power Plants,” Solar Power Plants, C. Winter, R. Rizmann, L Van-Hull (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
29.
Pilkington Solar International GmbH, 1999, “Survey of Thermal Storage for Parabolic Trough Power Plants,” Report prepared for and published by NREL, NREL/SR-550-27925, Golden, CO.
30.
Kelly, B., 2000, “Lessons Learned, Project History, and Operating Experience of the Solar Two Project,” Report No. SAND2000-2598, SNL, Albuquerque, NM.
31.
Pacheco, J., Showalter, S., and Kolb, W., 2001, “Development of a Molten-Salt Thermocline Thermal Storage System for Parabolic Trough Plants,” Proc. of Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC.
32.
Kearney, D., and Herrmann, U., 2001, “Nitrate Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid for Troughs,” Presentation at Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC.
33.
Wu, B., Reddy, R., and Rogers, R., 2001, “Novel Ionic Liquid Thermal Storage for Solar Thermal Electric Power Systems,” Proc. of Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC.
34.
B. Kelly, Herrmann, U., and Hale, M. J., 2001, “Optimization Studies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Proc. of Solar Forum 2001, Solar Energy: The Power to Choose, April 21-25, Washington, DC.
35.
Dersch
, J.
, Geyer
, M.
, Herrmann
, U.
, Kelly
, B.
, Kistner
, R.
, Pitz-Paal
, R.
, and Price
, H.
, 2002
, “Performance Modeling and Economical Evaluation of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems
,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
, submitted for publication.36.
Spencer Management Associates, 2000, “Draft Final Report Mexico Feasibility Study for an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle System (ISCCS),” Report to World Bank, Spencer, Diablo, CA.
37.
Svoboda, P., Dagan, E., and Kenan, G., 1997, “Comparison of DSG vs. HTF Technology for Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plants—Performance and Cost,” Proc. of 1997 Int. Solar Energy Conf., April 27-30, Washington, DC.
38.
Zarza, E., and Hennecke, K., 2000, “Direct Solar Steam Generation in Parabolic Troughs (DISS)-The First Year of Operation of the DISS Test Facility on the Plataforma Solar de Almerı´a.” Proc. of 10th Solar PACES Int. Symp. on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Solar Thermal 2000, Sydney, Australia, March 8-10.
39.
Reflective Energies, 2000, The Solar Trough Organic Rankine Electricity System (STORES)—Final Report, Deliverable to NREL, Reflective Energies, Mission Viejo, CA.
40.
Barber-Nichols, 2000, “NREL n-Pentane Solar Rankine Cycle Analysis and Review,” Final Report to NREL, NREL/TP-550-31240, NREL, Golden, CO.
41.
Price, H., and Hassani, V., 2002, “Modular Trough Power Plant Cycle and System Analysis,” NREL/TP-550-31240, NREL, Golden, CO.
42.
Luz International Limited (LIL), 1990, “Solar Electric Generating System IX (SEGS IX) Project Description,” LIL Documentation, Los Angeles, CA.
43.
NREL, 2001, “CSP-Africa Preliminary Evaluation Study,” Prepared for Eskom International by NREL, Golden, CO.
44.
Flachglas Solartechnik GmbH, 1994, “Assessment of Solar Thermal trough Power Plant Technology and its Transferability to the Mediterranean Region,” Final Report, prepared for the European Commission Directorate General I—External Economic Relations, Ko¨ln, Germany.
45.
Pilkington Solar International GmbH, 1999, “Solar Steam System Investment Cost,” Prepared for NREL by Pilkington, Ko¨ln, Germany.
46.
Leitner, A., 2001, “Fuel from the Sky: Solar Power’s Potential for Western Energy Supply,” RDI Consulting, Prepared for NREL by RDI Consulting, Boulder, CO.
Copyright © 2002
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
