Brush seals have proven to be an attractive alternative to labyrinth seals for turbomachinery applications. This innovation in seal technology utilizes both the high temperature capability of special-alloy wire and the flexural adaptability of fibers to accommodate a wide range of operating conditions that are encountered during service. The effectiveness of the seal is principally derived from the bristles ability to endure forces imparted by both the fluid and shaft, and yet maintain contact between the filament tips and the surface of the rotor. Consequently, contact forces generated along the interface of the fiber tip and rotor are an important consideration for both the design and performance of the rotor-seal assembly. This paper focuses on evaluating brush seal forces that arise along the surface of the rotor due to the dimensional disparity or interference between the rotor-fiber. Filament tip contact forces are computed on the basis of an in-plane, large deformation mechanics analysis of a cantilever beam, and validation of the model is assessed by using an electronic balance for measuring the shear and normal force exerted by a bristle tip onto a flat, hardened surface. Formulation of the mechanics problem is briefly reviewed, and includes the effect of Coulombic friction at the interface of the fiber tip and rotor. Filament contact force is used as a basis for computing bearing stress along the fiber-rotor interface. Results are reported for a range of brush seal design parameters in order to provide a better understanding of the role that seal geometry, friction, and bristle flexural rigidity play in generating rotor contact force.

1.
Basu
,
P.
,
Datta
,
A.
,
Loewenthal
,
R.
,
Short
,
J.
, and
Johnson
,
R.
,
1994
, “
Hysteresis and Bristle Stiffening Effects in Brush Seals
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
4
), pp.
569
575
.
2.
Sharatchandra
,
M. C.
, and
Rhode
,
D. L.
,
1996
, “
Computed Effects of Rotor-induced Swirl on Brush Seal Performance: Part 2—Bristle Force Analysis
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
118
, pp.
920
926
.
3.
Aksit
,
M. F.
, and
Tichy
,
J. A.
,
1998
, “
Wear of Brush Seals: Background and New Modeling Approach
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
41
(
3
), pp.
368
374
.
4.
Turner
,
M. T.
,
Chew
,
J. W.
, and
Long
,
C. A.
,
1998
, “
Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling of Clearance Brush Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
120
, pp.
573
579
.
5.
Chen
,
L. H.
,
Wood
,
P. E.
,
Jones
,
T. V.
, and
Chew
,
J. W.
,
1999
, “
An Iterative CFD and Mechanical Brush Seal Model and Comparison with Experimental Results
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
, pp.
656
662
.
6.
Howell
,
P. D.
, and
Lattimer
,
T. R. B.
, 1999, “Modelling Bristle Bending in Brush Seals,” Math. Engrg. Ind., 7(3), pp. 349–359.
7.
Stango
,
R. J.
,
Heinrich
,
S. M.
, and
Shia
,
C. Y.
,
1989
, “
Analysis of Constrained Filament Deformation and Stiffness Properties of Brushes
,”
ASME J. Ind.
,
111
(
3
), pp.
238
243
.
8.
Stango
,
R. J.
, and
Shia
,
C. Y.
,
1994
, “
On the Frictional Response of Circular Filamentary Brush in Contact with Planar Workpart
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
,
34
(
4
), pp.
573
589
.
9.
Schlumberger, J. A., Proctor, M. P., and Hendricks, R. C., 1991, “Eccentricity Effects on Leakage of a Brush Seal at Low Speeds,” NASA report no. TM-105141; also presented at the WAM, ASME, Atlanta, GA, 1991.
10.
Budynas, R. G., 1999, Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 152–156.
You do not currently have access to this content.