Recent attention has focused on the so-called “becalmed region” that is observed inside the boundary layers of turbomachinery blading and is associated with the process of wake-induced transition. Significant reductions of profile loss have been shown for high lift LP turbine blades at low Reynolds numbers due the effects of the becalmed region on the diffusing flow at the rear of the suction surface. In this paper the nature and the significance of the becalmed region are examined using experimental observations and computational studies. It is shown that the becalmed region may be modeled using the unsteady laminar boundary layer equations. Therefore, it is predictable independent of the transition or turbulence models employed. The effect of the becalmed region on the transition process is modeled using a spot-based intermittency transition model. An unsteady differential boundary layer code was used to simulate a deterministic experiment involving an isolated turbulent spot numerically. The predictability of the becalmed region means that the rate of entropy production can be calculated in that region. It is found to be of the order of that in a laminar boundary layer. It is for this reason and because the becalmed region may be encroached upon by pursuing turbulent flows that for attached boundary layers, wake-induced transition cannot significantly reduce the profile loss. However, the becalmed region is less prone to separation than a conventional laminar boundary layer. Therefore, the becalmed region may be exploited in order to prevent boundary layer separation and the increase in loss that this entails. It is shown that it should now be possible to design efficient high lift LP turbine blades.

1.
Addison
 
J. S.
, and
Hodson
 
H. P.
,
1992
, “
Modeling of Unsteady Transitional Boundary Layers
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
114
, pp.
580
589
.
2.
Banieghbal, M. R., Curtis, E. M., Denton, J. D., Hodson, H. P., Huntsman, I., Schulte, V., Harvey, N. W., and Steele, A. B., 1995, “Wake Passing in LP Turbine Blades,” presented at the AGARD conference, Derby, UK, pp. 8.5.–12.5.
3.
Cebeci, T., and Carr, L. W., 1978, “A Computer Program for Calculating Laminar and Turbulent Boundary Layers for Two Dimensional Time Dependent Flows,” NASA TM 78470, Mar.
4.
Cumpsty, N. A., Dong, Y., Li, Y. S., 1995, “Compressor blade boundary layers in the presence of wakes,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-443.
5.
Curtis
 
E. M.
,
Hodson
 
H. P.
,
Banieghbal
 
M. R.
,
Denton
 
J. D.
, and
Howell
 
R. J.
,
1997
, “
Development of blade profiles for low pressure turbine applications
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, pp.
531
538
.
6.
Denton, J. D., 1990, “Entropy generation in turbomachinery flows,” 7th Cliff Garrett Turbomachinery Award Lecture, SAE Paper No. 902011.
7.
Emmons
 
H. W.
,
1951
, “
The laminar-turbulent transition in a boundary layer—Part 1
,”
Journal of Aerospace Science
, Vol.
18
, No.
7
, pp.
490
498
.
8.
Gostelow
 
J. P.
,
Walker
 
G. J.
,
Solomon
 
W. J.
,
Hong
 
G.
, and
Melwani
 
N.
,
1997
, “
Investigation of the calmed region behind a turbulent spot
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, pp.
802
809
.
1.
Halstead
 
D. E.
,
Wisler
 
D. C.
,
Okiishi
 
T. H.
,
Walker
 
G. J.
,
Hodson
 
H. P.
, and
Shin
 
H.
,
1997
, “
Boundary layer development in axial compressors and turbines
,”
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, Part 1: pp.
114
127
;
2.
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, Part 2: pp.
426
445
;
3.
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, Part 3: pp.
225
237
;
4.
JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
119
, Part 4: pp.
128
139
.
1.
Hodson, H. P., 1984, “Boundary Layer and Loss Measurements on the Rotor of an Axial Flow Turbine,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 106, No. 2.
2.
Hodson
 
H. P.
, 1989, “
Modelling Unsteady Transition and Its Effects on Profile Loss
,” Proc. AGARD Conf. PEP 74a on Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines, AGARD CP 468; also
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
112
, Oct.
1990
, pp.
691
701
.
3.
Hodson
 
H. P.
,
Huntsman
 
I.
, and
Steele
 
A. B.
,
1994
, “
An investigation of boundary layer development in a multistage LP turbine
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
116
, pp.
375
383
.
4.
Hourmouziadis, J., 1989, “Aerodynamic Design of Low Pressure Turbines,” AGARD Lecture Series, 167.
5.
Narasimha
 
R.
,
1957
, “
On the Distribution of Intermittency in the Transition Region of a Boundary Layer
,”
Journal of Aerospace Science
, Vol.
24
, pp.
711
712
.
6.
Pfeil, H., Herbst, R., and Schro¨der, Th., 1983, “Investigation of laminar-turbulent transition of boundary layers distributed by wakes,” ASME Journal of Engineering for Power, Vol. 105, Jan.
7.
Schubauer, G. B., and Klebanoff, P. S., 1955, “Contributions on the Mechanics of Boundary Layer Transition,” NACA TN 3489 (1955) and NACA Rep. 1289 (1956).
8.
Schulte, V., 1995, “Unsteady Separated Boundary Layers in Axial-Flow Turbomachinery,” PhD Dissertation, Cambridge University.
9.
Schulte
 
V.
, and
Hodson
 
H. P.
,
1998
, “
Unsteady wake-induced boundary layer transition in high lift LP turbines
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY
, Vol.
120
, pp.
28
35
.
10.
Seifert, A., 1994, “The turbulent spot as a stabilising agent of a transitional boundary layer,” submitted for publication in the Journal of Fluid Mechanics.
11.
Truckenbrodt, E., 1973, “Neuere Erkenntnisse u¨ber die Berechnung von Stro¨mumgsgrenzschichten mittels einfacher Quadraturformeln,” Part I, Ing. Arch. 43, 9-25 (1973), Part II, Ing. Arch.. 43 136-144 (1974).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.